skip to main content

Title: Non-timber Forest Products Survey of Forest Landscape Restoration: A Case Study of Hybrid Ecosystem Restoration in Invaded Hawaiian Forest
Award ID(s):
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Sustainable Forestry
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1 to 16
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Deforestation drives climate change and reinforces food insecurity in forest dependent communities. What drives deforestation varies by location and is shaped by livelihood systems. But how locals perceive restoration is crucial for developing restoration policies. Evidence suggests that applying sustainable farming strategies can potentially restore forests and sustain livelihoods. Applying a broad-based conceptualization of deforestation and restoration in policymaking, however, results in missed opportunities for addressing deforestation and restoration. Here, we explore the drivers of deforestation, the perceptions of restoration, and the challenges to restoration among smallholder farmers in northern Malawi and examine how agroecology can contribute to restoring degraded agroecosystems. Participants report agricultural land expansion, charcoal production, climate change, burnt brick production, and government subsidies as the major drivers of deforestation. We observed that although perceptions of forest restoration reflect farmers' traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) to include reclamation of degraded farmlands, reconstruction of native tree species, and replacement of felled trees on farmlands, there are challenges including splitting families to gain access to more subsidized fertilizers and food aid, embedded cultural practices, growing demand for charcoal in cities, and weak ecosystem governance structures that hinder the effectiveness of restoration efforts. We, however, do find that agroecological intensification can increase yield from smaller farmlands and allow for larger and longer-lasting fallows of spare lands which regenerate forests. Key overarching implications of these findings include the need to integrate livelihoods more explicitly into restoration plans, accounting for TEK in restoration policies in forest-dependent communities and encouraging the adoption of agroecology. 
    more » « less
  2. So­cial, bio­phys­i­cal, and in­sti­tu­tional con­texts af­fect for­est users’ in­cen­tives to work to­gether to re­store forests. With re­newed gov­ern­ment com­mit­ments to sup­port such ac­tiv­i­ties, we ar­gue that ef­fec­tive in­ter­ven­tions need to con­sider sev­eral con­text-spe­cific fac­tors – such as the user groups’ fu­ture dis­count rates, op­por­tu­nity costs, and col­lec­tive-ac­tion ca­pa­bil­i­ties – be­cause these fac­tors will help de­ter­mine the ef­fec­tive­ness of such in­ter­ven­tions. To test the ef­fects of a suite of con­tex­tual fac­tors, we an­a­lyzed ob­ser­va­tions from 184 dif­fer­ent groups in 133 forests across eight de­vel­op­ing coun­tries. We find that the com­bi­na­tion of cer­tain en­abling fac­tors in­creases the prob­a­bil­ity of users un­der­tak­ing for­est im­prove­ment ac­tiv­i­ties, and that so­cial con­texts can con­di­tion the ef­fect of in­sti­tu­tional and bio­phys­i­cal con­texts. Our find­ings carry im­pli­ca­tions for the de­sign and im­ple­men­ta­tion of fu­ture in­ter­ven­tions to re­store forests in de­vel­op­ing coun­tries. 
    more » « less