skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Mathematics teacher educators’ thinking about mutuality in teaching
Stakeholders agree that the mathematical education of teachers needs to focus on mathematical knowledge for teaching, but the practice-based nature of this knowledge poses challenges for mathematics teacher educators — for understanding it, developing tasks that maintain its integrity in practice, and teaching it to teachers in ways that meaningfully support their learning to teach. We know little, however, about how mathematics teacher educators conceptualize the teaching that knowledge is to support. Our analysis reveals that thinking develops from a view of teaching as straightforward, where aspects can be treated in isolation, to a view of it as requiring focused attention while maintaining mutual regard for the whole. This difference has implications for how mathematics teacher educators understand specialized mathematical knowledge and for how to support their understanding and teaching of it.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1760788
PAR ID:
10434186
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Editor(s):
Hodgen, J.; Geraniou, E.; Bolondi, G.; & Ferretti, F.
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12)
Page Range / eLocation ID:
3551-3558
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education)
    Researchers conceptualize mathematical knowledge for teaching in different ways, but a coherent approach to the mathematical education of teachers requires teacher educators’ understanding to be robust and shared. At present, we know little about how teacher educators interpret and operationalize this important domain. Our analysis of interview data indicates two sites of divergence in teacher educators’ understanding. Some view this knowledge as a resource for the mathematical work of teaching, treating it as distant from actual practice, whereas others view it as a slice of the dynamic and situational work. Also, some view the mathematical work of teaching, and its knowledge demands, as detached from particulars of students and schooling, while others view this work as inseparable from student identities and the larger environments within which instruction occurs, thus integrating regard for equity. Implications are discussed. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education)
    Recent scholarship has explored mathematical demands faced by mathematics teacher educators and ways to support their development, but little attention has been given to the basic question of how mathematics teacher educators think about content knowledge for teaching. Knowing what they think could inform efforts to support them. Our analysis reveals that some think about mathematical knowledge for teaching as an independent, abstracted resource to be taught and learned in relative isolation from teaching, while others think about it as dynamic, situated work. We argue that this key difference matters for how they work with teachers. Further, our analysis reveals that their thinking about both teaching and justice interacts with their thinking about mathematical knowledge for teaching and that their thinking in these other two domains can be a resource for supporting their mathematical development. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, Revista Investigación y Formación Pedagógica)
    Cook, S; Katz, B; Moore-Russo, D (Ed.)
    Teaching mathematics for future elementary teachers is fundamentally different from other forms of mathematics and thus requires different knowledge. As community colleges become increasingly involved in the process of training future teachers, it is essential to explore how instructors at these institutions develop as mathematics teacher educators. This paper reports on a preliminary exploration of how community college faculty grappled with teaching-oriented mathematical tasks involving fractions. Choices of mathematical representation, selection of answer before and after discussion, and overall themes are discussed, with a focus on development of mathematical content knowledge for teaching. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education)
    Using student mathematical thinking during instruction is valued by the mathematics education community, yet practices surrounding such use remain difficult for teachers to enact well, particularly in the moment during whole-class instruction. Teachers’ orientations— their beliefs, values, and preferences—influence their actions, so one important aspect of understanding teachers’ use of student thinking as a resource is understanding their related orientations. To that end, the purpose of this study is to characterize teachers’ orientations toward using student mathematical thinking as a resource during whole-class instruction. We analyzed a collection of 173 thinking-as-a-resource orientations inferred from scenario-based interviews conducted with 13 teachers. The potential of each orientation to support the development of the practice of productively using student mathematical thinking was classified by considering each orientation’s relationship to three frameworks related to recognizing and leveraging high-potential instances of student mathematical thinking. After discussing orientations with different levels of potential, we consider the cases of two teachers to illustrate how a particular collection of thinking-as-a-resource orientations could support or hinder a teacher’s development of the practice of building on student thinking. The work contributes to the field’s understanding of why particular orientations might have more or less potential to support teachers’ development of particular teaching practices. It could also be used as a model for analyzing different collections of orientations and could support mathematics teacher educators by allowing them to better tailor their work to meet teachers’ specific needs. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; (, North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education)
    Lamberg, T. (Ed.)
    Our paper details the ways teachers understand and navigate equity-oriented dilemmas (Berlak & Berlak, 1981) when teaching mathematical modeling and how mathematics teacher educators can support teachers’ learning of culturally responsive mathematics teaching. Using Zavala and Aguirre’s (in press) framework for culturally responsive mathematics teaching, we explored the ways teachers describe and frame their choices when faced with dilemmas. Findings revealed that teachers identified dilemmas with Rigor and Support most often, followed by Knowledges and Identities. Dilemmas related to Power and Participation occurred far less frequently. Implications for teacher professional development are discussed. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email