skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Co-designing for Environmental Engagement: Moving inside people outside and moving outside people outdoors
We developed, with youth, a framework categorizing how people interact with nature. Our framework, inside versus outside versus outdoors, was developed using assets-based co-design principles with a small group of young men. Artifact analysis from co-design sessions found that our group readily applied this framework to community park infrastructure, community and individual behaviors observed within parks, and to support conversations involving participants’ personal values and sociocultural contexts.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2125526
PAR ID:
10436865
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Editor(s):
Slotta, Jim; Charles, Liz; Breuleux, Alain
Date Published:
Journal Name:
International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS)
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Manufacturing supply networks (MSNs) involve group decisions to achieve group goals and network decisions to achieve network goals. These decisions are made across multiple levels of a decision hierarchy. Resilience—the ability to maintain the satisfactory network functionality despite disruptions, is a vital network goal. When designing MSNs for resilience, the resilience and group goals often conflict, requiring simultaneous consideration of network and group decisions. Limited information in the early stages of MSN design necessitates focusing on design exploration. Hence, facilitating “co-design exploration”—a simultaneous exploration of network and group solution spaces, is crucial. Current approaches for designing MSNs for resilience do not support simultaneous consideration of network and group decisions. To bridge this gap, we present the co-design exploration of MSNs for resilience (CoDE-MR) framework to facilitate co-design exploration of the network and the groups. The CoDE-MR framework allows designers to model multilevel network and group decisions and their interactions, manage disruptions, and visualize and simultaneously explore the multilevel network and group solution spaces. In the framework, we integrate a combination of Preemptive and Archimedean formulations of the coupled-compromise decision support problem construct with resilience index metric and interpretable self-organizing map (iSOM)-based visualization to facilitate co-design exploration of MSNs for resilience. The framework's efficacy is demonstrated using a steel MSN problem, considering network and group decisions across two levels. The decision-centric framework is generic and well suited for the co-design exploration of multilevel systems to ensure resilience. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Manufacturing Supply Networks (MSNs) involve group decisions to achieve group goals and network decisions to achieve network goals. These decisions are made across multiple levels of a decision hierarchy. Given the frequent disruptions in MSNs, ‘resilience’ — the ability to maintain satisfactory network functionality despite disruptions, is a vital network goal. When designing MSNs for resilience, the resilience and group goals often conflict, requiring simultaneous consideration of network and group decisions. Limited information in the early stages of MSN design necessitates focusing on design exploration. Hence, facilitating ‘co-design exploration’ — a simultaneous exploration of network and group solution spaces is crucial. Current approaches for designing MSNs for resilience do not support simultaneous consideration of network and group decisions. To bridge this gap, we present the Co-Design Exploration of MSNs for Resilience (CoDE-MR) framework to facilitate co-design exploration of the network and the groups. CoDE-MR framework allows designers to model multilevel network and group decisions and their interactions, manage disruptions, and visualize and simultaneously explore the multilevel network and group solution spaces. In the framework, we integrate a combination of Preemptive and Archimedean formulations of the coupled-compromise Decision Support Problem construct with Resilience Index metric and interpretable Self-Organizing Map (iSOM)-based visualization to facilitate co-design exploration of MSNs for resilience. The framework’s efficacy is demonstrated using a steel MSN test problem, considering network and group decisions across two levels. The use of information flow and generic constructs makes the framework generic and well-suited for co-design exploration of multilevel systems to ensure resilience. 
    more » « less
  3. The inclusion of community voices in research is important. Over the years, research training programs have continued to emphasize that engagement with communities at the focus of research can promote thoughtful, sensitive designs ( Rivera et al., 2004 ). In this paper, we discuss a method for youth participation in the research process. In an attempt to move beyond “staged and superficial” participation in gathering youth perspectives, we advocate for including co-researchers in the development and modification of fundamental aspects of the research process, from data analysis to the development of additional research questions and collection methods ( Guishard & Tuck, 2013 ). In the course of a study designed to enroll middle school students in participatory co-design sessions ( Cahill, 2007 ) to aid in the development of educational technologies, it became apparent that our youth participants, as co-researchers, could also aid in the development, analysis, and coding of anonymized interview transcripts; development of themes; and creation of models for behaviors found in the transcripts ( Docan-Morgan, 2010 ; Luchtenberg et al., 2020 ). Thus, this paper presents a practical example of a co-research process that includes youth participants, with an emphasis on training in qualitative coding and the fundamentals of research design. 
    more » « less
  4. Data visualization literacy is essential for K-12 students, yet existing practices emphasize interpreting pre-made visualizations rather than creating them. To address this, we developed the DPV (Domain, Purpose, Visual) framework, which guides middle school students through the visualization design process. The framework simplifies design into three stages: understanding the problem domain, specifying the communication purpose, and translating data into effective visuals. Implemented in a twoweek summer camp as a usage scenario, the DPV framework enabled students to create visualizations addressing community issues. Evaluation of student artifacts, focus group interviews, and surveys demonstrated its effectiveness in enhancing students' design skills and understanding of visualization concepts. This work highlights the DPV framework's potential to foster data visualization literacy for K-12 education and broaden participation in the data visualization community. 
    more » « less
  5. Co-creation in academe can take multiple forms. In this research, the co-creation focus is on collaboration between faculty and graduate students to develop educational modules. This activity is designed to improve graduate education and prepare students for conducting graduate research. In previous work presented at ASEE 2022, we discussed benefits and challenges of participating in the co-creation process. This current paper focuses on how we took lessons from our first year and transformed them into a structure to better support interdisciplinary research, collaboration, and community building. We will discuss how we supported the process of co-creation by developing a series of workshops to scaffold student learning. Scaffolds are instructional methods and interventions that are designed to foster skill development by allowing for interactions between what students already know and what they have yet to learn. These workshops were designed using the tenets of the gold standard project-based learning (PjBL). The PjBL framework is itself a scaffold that is designed to build research competencies. Specifically, to introduce a challenging problem or question, we created multiple technical overviews of the cyber-physical system theme of interest that would constitute the eventual educational modules. We scaffolded sustained inquiry by developing a workshop using techniques from the Right Question Institute, and also through a workshop about crafting your message for different audiences. To support the PjBL idea of authenticity, we developed a workshop about core values to help students connect personally to their project topics. To further support collaboration and community building, we developed a workshop to introduce ideas of interdisciplinary collaboration, including developing community agreements and recognizing and responding to microaggressions. Periodic reinforcements of these topics were incorporated as students progressed in their co-creation project. We assessed how students applied these topics through student reflections. Scaffolding students’ learning helped to address co-creation challenges that were expressed by our pilot group, including not understanding the goals of the project and not feeling connected to the research. Observational data of the current groups suggests that students have better understanding of the co-creation process and are collaborating more effectively than our pilot group students, and focus group data confirmed these observations. We also collected feedback from students about the workshops to evaluate what is effective about them and what can be improved. Students felt skills taught in the workshops such as how to prioritize research questions, construct messages for specific audiences, and perform literature searches and reviews, were all effective and useful as they worked on their projects. For improvement, they suggested clearer objectives and more workshops that focus on technical aspects of the project work would be helpful. 
    more » « less