More Like this

1. Clustering with faulty centers

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2023.102052  

   Fox, Emily; Huang, Hongyao; Raichel, Benjamin (February 2024, Computational Geometry)

   In this paper we introduce and formally study the problem of $$k$$-clustering with faulty centers. Specifically, we study the faulty versions of $$k$$-center, $$k$$-median, and $$k$$-means clustering, where centers have some probability of not existing, as opposed to prior work where clients had some probability of not existing. For all three problems we provide fixed parameter tractable algorithms, in the parameters $$k$$, $$d$$, and $$\eps$$, that $$(1+\eps)$$-approximate the minimum expected cost solutions for points in $$d$$ dimensional Euclidean space. For Faulty $$k$$-center we additionally provide a 5-approximation for general metrics. Significantly, all of our algorithms have only a linear dependence on $$n$$. 

   more » « less
2. Universal Algorithms for Clustering

   Bruce Maggs, Arun Ganesh (April 2021, Leibniz international proceedings in informatics)

   Bansal, Nikhil and (Ed.)

   his paper presents universal algorithms for clustering problems, including the widely studied k-median, k-means, and k-center objectives. The input is a metric space containing all potential client locations. The algorithm must select k cluster centers such that they are a good solution for any subset of clients that actually realize. Specifically, we aim for low regret, defined as the maximum over all subsets of the difference between the cost of the algorithm’s solution and that of an optimal solution. A universal algorithm’s solution sol for a clustering problem is said to be an (α, β)-approximation if for all subsets of clients C', it satisfies sol(C') ≤ α ⋅ opt(C') + β ⋅ mr, where opt(C') is the cost of the optimal solution for clients C' and mr is the minimum regret achievable by any solution. Our main results are universal algorithms for the standard clustering objectives of k-median, k-means, and k-center that achieve (O(1), O(1))-approximations. These results are obtained via a novel framework for universal algorithms using linear programming (LP) relaxations. These results generalize to other 𝓁_p-objectives and the setting where some subset of the clients are fixed. We also give hardness results showing that (α, β)-approximation is NP-hard if α or β is at most a certain constant, even for the widely studied special case of Euclidean metric spaces. This shows that in some sense, (O(1), O(1))-approximation is the strongest type of guarantee obtainable for universal clustering. 

   more » « less
3. Improved Approximation Algorithms for Relational Clustering

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3695831  

   Esmailpour, Aryan; Sintos, Stavros (November 2024, Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data)

   Clustering plays a crucial role in computer science, facilitating data analysis and problem-solving across numerous fields. By partitioning large datasets into meaningful groups, clustering reveals hidden structures and relationships within the data, aiding tasks such as unsupervised learning, classification, anomaly detection, and recommendation systems. Particularly in relational databases, where data is distributed across multiple tables, efficient clustering is essential yet challenging due to the computational complexity of joining tables. This paper addresses this challenge by introducing efficient algorithms for k-median and k-means clustering on relational data without the need for pre-computing the join query results. For the relational k-median clustering, we propose the first efficient relative approximation algorithm. For the relational k-means clustering, our algorithm significantly improves both the approximation factor and the running time of the known relational k-means clustering algorithms, which suffer either from large constant approximation factors, or expensive running time. Given a join query q and a database instance D of O(N) tuples, for both k-median and k-means clustering on the results of q on D, we propose randomized (1+ε)γ-approximation algorithms that run in roughly O(k²N^fhw)+T_γ(k²) time, where ε ∈ (0,1) is a constant parameter decided by the user, \fhw is the fractional hyper-tree width of Q, while γ and T_γ(x) represent the approximation factor and the running time, respectively, of a traditional clustering algorithm in the standard computational setting over x points. 

   more » « less
4. Universal Algorithms for Clustering Problems

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3572840  

   Ganesh, Arun; Maggs, Bruce M; Panigrahi, Debmalya (April 2023, ACM Transactions on Algorithms)

   This article presentsuniversalalgorithms for clustering problems, including the widely studiedk-median,k-means, andk-center objectives. The input is a metric space containing allpotentialclient locations. The algorithm must selectkcluster centers such that they are a good solution foranysubset of clients that actually realize. Specifically, we aim for lowregret, defined as the maximum over all subsets of the difference between the cost of the algorithm’s solution and that of an optimal solution. A universal algorithm’s solutionSolfor a clustering problem is said to be an α , β-approximation if for all subsets of clientsC^′, it satisfiessol(C^′) ≤ α ċopt(C′) + β ċmr, whereopt(C′ is the cost of the optimal solution for clients (C′) andmris the minimum regret achievable by any solution. Our main results are universal algorithms for the standard clustering objectives ofk-median,k-means, andk-center that achieve (O(1),O(1))-approximations. These results are obtained via a novel framework for universal algorithms using linear programming (LP) relaxations. These results generalize to other ℓ_p-objectives and the setting where some subset of the clients arefixed. We also give hardness results showing that (α, β)-approximation is NP-hard if α or β is at most a certain constant, even for the widely studied special case of Euclidean metric spaces. This shows that in some sense, (O(1),O(1))-approximation is the strongest type of guarantee obtainable for universal clustering. 

   more » « less
5. Submodular Clustering in Low Dimensions

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2020.8  

   Backurs, Arturs; Har-Peled, Sariel (January 2020, 17th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory)

   We study a clustering problem where the goal is to maximize the coverage of the input points by k chosen centers. Specifically, given a set of n points P ⊆ ℝ^d, the goal is to pick k centers C ⊆ ℝ^d that maximize the service ∑_{p∈P}φ(𝖽(p,C)) to the points P, where 𝖽(p,C) is the distance of p to its nearest center in C, and φ is a non-increasing service function φ: ℝ+ → ℝ+. This includes problems of placing k base stations as to maximize the total bandwidth to the clients - indeed, the closer the client is to its nearest base station, the more data it can send/receive, and the target is to place k base stations so that the total bandwidth is maximized. We provide an n^{ε^-O(d)} time algorithm for this problem that achieves a (1-ε)-approximation. Notably, the runtime does not depend on the parameter k and it works for an arbitrary non-increasing service function φ: ℝ+ → ℝ+. 

   more » « less