skip to main content


Title: An inverse probability weighted regression method that accounts for right‐censoring for causal inference with multiple treatments and a binary outcome
Summary

Comparative effectiveness research often involves evaluating the differences in the risks of an event of interest between two or more treatments using observational data. Often, the post‐treatment outcome of interest is whether the event happens within a pre‐specified time window, which leads to a binary outcome. One source of bias for estimating the causal treatment effect is the presence of confounders, which are usually controlled using propensity score‐based methods. An additional source of bias is right‐censoring, which occurs when the information on the outcome of interest is not completely available due to dropout, study termination, or treatment switch before the event of interest. We propose an inverse probability weighted regression‐based estimator that can simultaneously handle both confounding and right‐censoring, calling the method CIPWR, with the letter C highlighting the censoring component. CIPWR estimates the average treatment effects by averaging the predicted outcomes obtained from a logistic regression model that is fitted using a weighted score function. The CIPWR estimator has a double robustness property such that estimation consistency can be achieved when either the model for the outcome or the models for both treatment and censoring are correctly specified. We establish the asymptotic properties of the CIPWR estimator for conducting inference, and compare its finite sample performance with that of several alternatives through simulation studies. The methods under comparison are applied to a cohort of prostate cancer patients from an insurance claims database for comparing the adverse effects of four candidate drugs for advanced stage prostate cancer.

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10442548
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Statistics in Medicine
Volume:
42
Issue:
20
ISSN:
0277-6715
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 3699-3715
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Estimating population‐level effects of a vaccine is challenging because there may be interference, that is, the outcome of one individual may depend on the vaccination status of another individual. Partial interference occurs when individuals can be partitioned into groups such that interference occurs only within groups. In the absence of interference, inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimators are commonly used to draw inference about causal effects of an exposure or treatment. Tchetgen Tchetgen and VanderWeele proposed a modified IPW estimator for causal effects in the presence of partial interference. Motivated by a cholera vaccine study in Bangladesh, this paper considers an extension of the Tchetgen Tchetgen and VanderWeele IPW estimator to the setting where the outcome is subject to right censoring using inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW). Censoring weights are estimated using proportional hazards frailty models. The large sample properties of the IPCW estimators are derived, and simulation studies are presented demonstrating the estimators' performance in finite samples. The methods are then used to analyze data from the cholera vaccine study.

     
    more » « less
  2. We consider comparative effectiveness research (CER) from observational data with two or more treatments. In observational studies, the estimation of causal effects is prone to bias due to confounders related to both treatment and outcome. Methods based on propensity scores are routinely used to correct for such confounding biases. A large fraction of propensity score methods in the current literature consider the case of either two treatments or continuous outcome. There has been extensive literature with multiple treatment and binary outcome, but interest often lies in the intersection, for which the literature is still evolving. The contribution of this article is to focus on this intersection and compare across methods, some of which are fairly recent. We describe propensity‐based methods when more than two treatments are being compared, and the outcome is binary. We assess the relative performance of these methods through a set of simulation studies. The methods are applied to assess the effect of four common therapies for castration‐resistant advanced‐stage prostate cancer. The data consist of medical and pharmacy claims from a large national private health insurance network, with the adverse outcome being admission to the emergency room within a short time window of treatment initiation.

     
    more » « less
  3. In many medical and scientific settings, the choice of treatment or intervention may be de-termined by a covariate threshold. For example, elderly men may receive more thoroughdiagnosis if their prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is high. In these cases, the causaltreatment effect is often of great interest, especially when there is a lack of evidence fromrandomized clinical trials. From the social science literature, a class of methods known asregression discontinuity (RD) designs can be used to estimate the treatment effect in thissituation. Under certain assumptions, such an estimand enjoys a causal interpretation. Weshow how to estimate causal effects under the regression discontinuity design for censoreddata. The proposed estimation procedure employs a class of censoring unbiased transfor-mations that includes inverse probability censored weighting and doubly robust transfor-mation schemes. Simulation studies are used to evaluate the finite-sample properties of theproposed estimator. We also illustrate the proposed method by evaluating the causal effectof PSA-dependent screening strategies 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curves are often used to evaluate the classification performance of continuous measures when considering time‐to‐event data. When one is interested in evaluating the predictive performance of multiple covariates, it is common to use the Cox proportional hazards model to obtain risk scores; however, previous work has shown that when the model is mis‐specified, the estimand corresponding to the partial likelihood estimator depends on the censoring distribution. In this manuscript, we show that when the risk score model is mis‐specified, the AUC will also depend on the censoring distribution, leading to either over‐ or under‐estimation of the risk score's predictive performance. We propose the use of censoring‐robust estimators to remove the dependence on the censoring distribution and provide empirical results supporting the use of censoring‐robust risk scores.

     
    more » « less
  5. Matching on an estimated propensity score is frequently used to estimate the effects of treatments from observational data. Since the 1970s, different authors have proposed methods to combine matching at the design stage with regression adjustment at the analysis stage when estimating treatment effects for continuous outcomes. Previous work has consistently shown that the combination has generally superior statistical properties than either method by itself. In biomedical and epidemiological research, survival or time-to-event outcomes are common. We propose a method to combine regression adjustment and propensity score matching to estimate survival curves and hazard ratios based on estimating an imputed potential outcome under control for each successfully matched treated subject, which is accomplished using either an accelerated failure time parametric survival model or a Cox proportional hazard model that is fit to the matched control subjects. That is, a fitted model is then applied to the matched treated subjects to allow simulation of the missing potential outcome under control for each treated subject. Conventional survival analyses (e.g., estimation of survival curves and hazard ratios) can then be conducted using the observed outcome under treatment and the imputed outcome under control. We evaluated the repeated-sampling bias of the proposed methods using simulations. When using nearest neighbor matching, the proposed method resulted in decreased bias compared to crude analyses in the matched sample. We illustrate the method in an example prescribing beta-blockers at hospital discharge to patients hospitalized with heart failure.

     
    more » « less