We report one of the first comprehensive ground‐based investigations of energy transfer rates in the E‐region ionosphere compared relative to geomagnetic activity, seasonal effects, and solar activity level using nearly continuously sampled data collected with the Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar (PFISR) between 2010 and 2019. We quantified the integrated electromagnetic (EM) energy transfer rate and the integrated Joule heating rate in the E‐region between 90 and 130 km, which includes the contribution from the neutral winds. We find that (a) the median Joule heating rate and EM energy transfer rate in the evening sector are larger in the winter versus the summer and have similar magnitudes in the spring and fall for the same solar activity and geomagnetic conditions. (b) The seasonal dependence of the energy transfer rates is closely associated with the seasonal variations of the electric fields. Our analysis shows that the larger EM energy transfer and Joule heating rates in disturbed conditions in the winter versus the summer are associated with the combined effects of both the electric field and Pedersen conductance with the electric field playing a dominant role. Given that the Pedersen conductance in the evening sector is closely related to the particle precipitation and field aligned currents in the auroral region, this study provides complementary ionospheric evidence of the winter‐summer asymmetry of the intensity and density of field‐aligned currents (e.g., Ohtani et al., 2009,
Stable auroral red (SAR) arcs provide opportunities to study inner magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling at midlatitudes. An imaging system at a single‐site obtains evidence of seasonal variations in SAR arc brightness and occurrence rates using events widely separated in time, as observed during different geomagnetic storms. The first SAR arc observed using two all‐sky imagers at geomagnetic conjugate points described seasonal effects at the same time for the same storm (Martinis, Mendillo, et al., 2019,
- Award ID(s):
- 1659304
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10445707
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Volume:
- 124
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 2169-9380
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 6330-6342
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract https://doi.org/10.1029/2009ja014115 ). (c) The geomagnetic activity level has the most significant impact on the magnitude of the energy transfer rates, followed by seasonal variations, and last the solar activity level. -
more » « less
Abstract We present empirical conductance relations that are derived from incoherent scatter radar observations and correlated with all sky imager observations to identify the morphology of the aurora. We use 75,461 events collected using the Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar (PFISR) with associated all sky imagers observations spanning the years 2012–2016. In addition to classifying these events based on auroral morphology, we estimated the Hall and Pedersen conductance and the differential number flux from which the energy flux and the average energy can be calculated. The differential number flux was estimated using the maximum entropy inversion method described in Semeter and Kamalabadi (2005,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RS003042 ), but now incorporating the Fang et al. (2010,https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045406 ) ionization model. The main results of this investigation are the power law equations that describe the median, 90th, and 10th percentile Hall and Pedersen conductance as a function of energy flux and average energy. These power law fits are performed for different auroral morphology including all events, discrete, diffuse, and pulsating auroral events. The median Pedersen conductance is found to be in good agreement with past empirical conductance specifications by Robinson et al. (1987,https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA03p02565 ); however, the median Hall conductance from the PFISR observations is found to be larger than the empirical Hall conductance formulas by Robinson et al. (1987,https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA03p02565 ). Pulsating aurora is found to be the most frequently occurring auroral morphology. Furthermore, pulsating aurora has an important contribution to Hall conductance since it has higher average energies than discrete aurora. The results from this investigation are applicable to space weather models and may enable better agreement between model‐data comparisons. -
more » « less
Abstract We introduce a new framework called Machine Learning (ML) based Auroral Ionospheric electrodynamics Model (ML‐AIM). ML‐AIM solves a current continuity equation by utilizing the ML model of Field Aligned Currents of Kunduri et al. (2020,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027908 ), the FAC‐derived auroral conductance model of Robinson et al. (2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028008 ), and the solar irradiance conductance model of Moen and Brekke (1993,https://doi.org/10.1029/92gl02109 ). The ML‐AIM inputs are 60‐min time histories of solar wind plasma, interplanetary magnetic fields (IMF), and geomagnetic indices, and its outputs are ionospheric electric potential, electric fields, Pedersen/Hall currents, and Joule Heating. We conduct two ML‐AIM simulations for a weak geomagnetic activity interval on 14 May 2013 and a geomagnetic storm on 7–8 September 2017. ML‐AIM produces physically accurate ionospheric potential patterns such as the two‐cell convection pattern and the enhancement of electric potentials during active times. The cross polar cap potentials (ΦPC ) from ML‐AIM, the Weimer (2005,https://doi.org/10.1029/2004ja010884 ) model, and the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) data‐assimilated potentials, are compared to the ones from 3204 polar crossings of the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program F17 satellite, showing better performance of ML‐AIM than others. ML‐AIM is unique and innovative because it predicts ionospheric responses to the time‐varying solar wind and geomagnetic conditions, while the other traditional empirical models like Weimer (2005,https://doi.org/10.1029/2004ja010884 ) designed to provide a quasi‐static ionospheric condition under quasi‐steady solar wind/IMF conditions. Plans are underway to improve ML‐AIM performance by including a fully ML network of models of aurora precipitation and ionospheric conductance, targeting its characterization of geomagnetically active times. -
more » « less
Abstract Interplanetary (IP) shocks drive magnetosphere‐ionosphere (MI) current systems that in turn are associated with ground magnetic perturbations. Recent work has shown that IP shock impact angle plays a significant role in controlling the subsequent geomagnetic activity and magnetic perturbations; for example, highly inclined shocks drive asymmetric MI responses due to interhemispherical asymmetric magnetospheric compressions, while almost head‐on shocks drive more symmetric MI responses. However, there are few observations confirming that inclined shocks drive such asymmetries in the high‐latitude ground magnetic response. We use data from a chain of Antarctic magnetometers, combined with magnetically conjugate stations on the west coast of Greenland, to test these model predictions (Oliveira & Raeder, 2015,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021147 ; Oliveira, 2017,https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-016-0472-x ). We calculate the time derivative of the magnetic field () in each hemisphere separately. Next, we examine the ratio of Northern to Southern Hemisphere intensities and the time differences between the maximum immediately following the impact of IP shocks. We order these results according to shock impact angles obtained from a recently published database with over 500 events and discuss how shock impact angles affect north‐south hemisphere asymmetries in the ground magnetic response. We find that the hemisphere the shock strikes first usually has (1) the first response in and (2) the most intense response in . Additionally, we show that highly inclined shocks can generate high‐latitude ground magnetic responses that differ significantly from predictions based on models that assume symmetric driving conditions. -
more » « less
Abstract Narrowband stimulated electromagnetic emissions (NSEE), a component of radio emissions created during high‐frequency (HF) radiowave ionospheric modification experiments, occur within 1 kHz of the HF pump frequency. NSEE was observed and studied for the first time at the HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) facility in Alaska (Norin et al., 2009,
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.065003 ; Bernhardt et al., 2010,https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.165004 ). Magnetized stimulated Brillouin scatter (MSBS) is a component of NSEE, which was also first observed at HAARP (Norin et al., 2009,https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.065003 ; Bernhardt et al., 2010,https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.165004 ) and later at European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association (Fu et al., 2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-983-2015 ). Ion‐acoustic and electrostatic ion cyclotron modes are the daughter products of MSBS and can be used for the determination of the electron temperature and of the presence of minor ion species, respectively, in the HF‐modified ionosphere. Here we present the first observations of the MSBS process at magnetic midlatitudes, excited during radio wave ionospheric modification experiments at the Arecibo Observatory. The NSEE observations, in combination with a theoretical model and the wave matching conditions, are used to estimate background ionospheric parameters. A qualitative comparison of the MSBS component of the NSEE spectrum with the thermal ion line measured by incoherent scatter radar is presented.
