A major challenge for lithium-containing electrochemical systems is the formation of lithium carbonates. Solid-state electrolytes circumvent the use of organic liquids that can generate these species, but they are still susceptible to Li2CO3 formation from exposure to water vapor and carbon dioxide. It is reported here that trace quantities of Li2CO3, which are re-formed following standard mitigation and handling procedures, can decompose at high charging potentials and degrade the electrolyte–cathode interface. Operando electrochemical mass spectrometry (EC–MS) is employed to monitor the outgassing of solid-state batteries containing the garnet electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) and using appropriate controls CO2 and O2 are identified to emanate from the electrolyte–cathode interface at charging potentials > 3.8 V (vs Li/Li+). The gas evolution is correlated with a large increase in cathode interfacial resistance observed by potential-resolved impedance spectroscopy. This is the first evidence of electrochemical decomposition of interfacial Li2CO3 in garnet cells and suggests a need to report “time-to-assembly” for cell preparation methods
more »
« less
Decomposition of Trace Li 2 CO 3 During Charging Leads to Cathode Interface Degradation with the Solid Electrolyte LLZO
A major challenge for lithium‐containing electrochemical systems is the formation of lithium carbonates. Solid‐state electrolytes circumvent the use of organic liquids that can generate these species, but they are still susceptible to Li2CO3formation from exposure to water vapor and carbon dioxide. It is reported here that trace quantities of Li2CO3, which are re‐formed following standard mitigation and handling procedures, can decompose at high charging potentials and degrade the electrolyte–cathode interface. Operando electrochemical mass spectrometry (EC–MS) is employed to monitor the outgassing of solid‐state batteries containing the garnet electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12(LLZO) and using appropriate controls CO2and O2are identified to emanate from the electrolyte–cathode interface at charging potentials > 3.8 V (vs Li/Li+). The gas evolution is correlated with a large increase in cathode interfacial resistance observed by potential‐resolved impedance spectroscopy. This is the first evidence of electrochemical decomposition of interfacial Li2CO3in garnet cells and suggests a need to report “time‐to‐assembly” for cell preparation methods.
more » « less- PAR ID:
- 10446207
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 34
- ISSN:
- 1616-301X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
more » « less
Abstract A thin solid electrolyte with a high Li+conductivity is used to separate the metallic lithium anode and the cathode in an all‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery. However, most solid Li‐ion electrolytes have a small electrochemical stability window, large interfacial resistance, and cannot block lithium‐dendrite growth when lithium is plated on charging of the cell. Mg2+stabilizes a rhombohedral NASICON‐structured solid electrolyte of the formula Li1.2Mg0.1Zr1.9(PO4)3(LMZP). This solid electrolyte has Li‐ion conductivity two orders of magnitude higher at 25 °C than that of the triclinic LiZr2(PO4)3.7Li and6Li NMR confirm the Li‐ions in two different crystallographic sites of the NASICON framework with 85% of the Li‐ions having a relatively higher mobility than the other 15%. The anode–electrolyte interface is further investigated with symmetric Li/LMZP/Li cell testing, while the cathode–electrolyte interface is explored with an all‐solid‐state Li/LMZP/LiFePO4cell. The enhanced performance of these cells enabled by the Li1.2Mg0.1Zr1.9(PO4)3solid electrolyte is stable upon repeated charge/discharge cycling.
-
more » « less
Abstract The interface between cathode and electrolyte is a significant source of large interfacial resistance in solid‐state batteries (SSBs). Spark plasma sintering (SPS) allows densifying electrolyte and electrodes in one step, which can improve the interfacial contact in SSBs and significantly shorten the processing time. In this work, we proposed a two‐step joining process to prepare cathode (LiCoO2, LCO)/electrolyte (Li0.33La0.57TiO3, LLTO) half cells via SPS. Interdiffusion between Ti4+/Co3+was observed at the interface by SEM/STEM, resulting in the formation of the Li−Ti−La−Co−O and Li−Ti−Co−O phases in LLTO and the Li−Co−Ti−O phase in LCO. Computational modeling was performed to verify that the Li−Ti−Co−O phase has a LiTi2O4host lattice. In a study of interfacial electrical properties, the resistance of this interdiffusion layer was found to be 105 Ω, which is 40 times higher than the resistance of the individual LLTO phase. The formation of an interdiffusion layer is identified as the origin of the high interface resistance in the LLTO/LCO half‐cell.
-
more » « less
Abstract Solid‐state lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) have been developed as a promising replacement for conventional Li‐ion batteries due to their potential for higher energy. However, the current solid‐state electrolytes used in LMBs have limitations regarding mechanical and electrochemical properties and interfacial stability. Here, a fluorine (F)‐containing solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) having a bi‐continuous structure of F‐containing elastomers and plastic crystals is reported. The trifluoroethyl acrylate‐based SPE (T‐SPE) exhibits high ionic conductivity over 10−3 S cm−1, superior mechanical elasticity, and robust LiF‐rich interphases at both the Li metal anode and the LiNi0.83Mn0.06Co0.11O2cathode. Full cells with thin T‐SPEs and low negative/positive capacity ratios below 0.5 at the high‐operating voltage of 4.5 V demonstrate a high specific energy of 538 Wh kganode+cathode+electrolyte−1and maintain 393 Wh kg−1at a high specific power of 804 W kganode+cathode+electrolyte−1. The F‐containing phase‐separated SPE system provides a powerful strategy for achieving high‐energy and ‐power solid‐state LMBs.
-
more » « less
Abstract Solid‐state lithium metal batteries with garnet‐type electrolyte provide several advantages over conventional lithium‐ion batteries, especially for safety and energy density. However, a few grand challenges such as the propagation of Li dendrites, poor interfacial contact between the solid electrolyte and the electrodes, and formation of lithium carbonate during ambient exposure over the solid‐state electrolyte prevent the viability of such batteries. Herein, an ultrathin sub‐nanometer porous carbon nanomembrane (CNM) is employed on the surface of solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) that increases the adhesion of SSE with electrodes, prevents lithium carbonate formation over the surface, regulates the flow of Li‐ions, and blocks any electronic leakage. The sub‐nanometer scale pores in CNM allow rapid permeation of Li‐ions across the electrode–electrolyte interface without the presence of any liquid medium. Additionally, CNM suppresses the propagation of Li dendrites by over sevenfold up to a current density of 0.7 mA cm−2and enables the cycling of all‐solid‐state batteries at low stack pressure of 2 MPa using LiFePO4cathode and Li metal anode. The CNM provides chemical stability to the solid electrolyte for over 4 weeks of ambient exposure with less than a 4% increase in surface impurities.
