We present observations that suggest the X-line of guide-field magnetic reconnection is not necessarily orthogonal to the plane in which magnetic reconnection is occurring. The plane of magnetic reconnection is often referred to as the
- Award ID(s):
- 2000222
- PAR ID:
- 10448909
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Volume:
- 950
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 0004-637X
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 168
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract L–N plane, whereL is the direction of the reversing and reconnecting magnetic field andN is normal to the current sheet. The X-line is often assumed to be orthogonal to theL–N plane (defined as theM -direction) in the majority of theoretical studies and numerical simulations. The four-satellite Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission, however, observes a guide-field magnetic reconnection event in Earth’s magnetotail in which the X-line may be oblique to theL–N plane. This finding is somewhat opportune as two of the MMS satellites at the sameN location report nearly identical observations with no significant time delays in the electron diffusion region (EDR) even though they have substantial separation inL . A minimum directional derivative analysis suggests that the X-line is between 40° and 60° fromM , adding support that the X-line is oblique. Furthermore, the measured ion velocity is inconsistent with the apparent motion of the MMS spacecraft in theL -direction through the EDR, which can be resolved if one assumes a shear in theL–N plane and motion in theM -direction. A nonorthogonal X-line, if somewhat common, would call for revisiting theory and simulations of guide-field magnetic reconnection, reexamination of how the reconnection electric field is supported in the EDR, and reconsidering the large-scale geometry of the X-line. -
more » « less
Abstract We use the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) with embedded particle‐in‐cell model (MHD‐EPIC) to study the Geospace Environment Modeling (GEM) dayside kinetic processes challenge event at 01:50–03:00 UT on 18 November 2015, when the magnetosphere was driven by a steady southward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). In the MHD‐EPIC simulation, the dayside magnetopause is covered by a PIC code so that the dayside reconnection is properly handled. We compare the magnetic fields and the plasma profiles of the magnetopause crossing with the MMS3 spacecraft observations. Most variables match the observations well in the magnetosphere, in the magnetosheath, and also during the current sheet crossing. The MHD‐EPIC simulation produces flux ropes, and we demonstrate that some magnetic field and plasma features observed by the MMS3 spacecraft can be reproduced by a flux rope crossing event. We use an algorithm to automatically identify the reconnection sites from the simulation results. It turns out that there are usually multiple X‐lines at the magnetopause. By tracing the locations of the X‐lines, we find that the typical moving speed of the X‐line endpoints is about 70 km/s, which is higher than but still comparable with the ground‐based observations.
-
more » « less
Abstract Three‐dimensional X‐line spreading is important for the coupling between global dynamics and local kinetic physics of magnetic reconnection. Using large‐scale 3‐D particle‐in‐cell simulations, we investigate the spreading of the X‐line out of the reconnection plane under a strong guide field in asymmetric reconnection. The X‐line spreading speed depends strongly on the equilibrium current sheet thickness. In a simulation with a thick, ion‐scale equilibrium current sheet (CS), the X‐line spreads at the ambient species drift speeds, which are significantly lower than the Alfvén speed based on the guide field
(sub‐Alfvénic spreading). In simulations with a sub‐ion‐scale CS, the X‐line spreads at instead (Alfvénic spreading). An Alfvénic signal consistent with kinetic Alfvén waves develops and propagates, leading to CS thinning and extending, which ultimately causes reconnection onset. The continuous onset of reconnection along the propagation direction of the signal manifests as Alfvénic X‐line spreading. The strong dependence on the CS thickness of the spreading speeds and the orientation of the X‐line are consistent with the collisionless tearing instability. Our simulations indicate that when the collisionless tearing growth is sufficiently strong in a thinner CS such that , Alfvénic X‐line spreading can effectively take place. Our results compare favorably with a number of numerical simulations and recent magnetopause observations. An important implication of this work is that the magnetopause CS is typically too thick for the X‐line to spread at the Alfvén speed. -
more » « less
Abstract An
LMN coordinate system for magnetic reconnection events is sometimes determined by definingN as the direction of the gradient across the current sheet andL as the direction of maximum variance of the magnetic field. The third direction,M , is often assumed to be the direction of zero gradient, and thus the orientation of the X line. But when there is a guide field, the X line direction may have a significant component in the L direction defined in this way. For a 2D description, a coordinate system describing such an event would preferably be defined using a different coordinate directionM ′ oriented along the X line. Here we use a 3D particle‐in‐cell simulation to show that the X line is oriented approximately along the direction bisecting the asymptotic magnetic field directions on the two sides of the current sheet. We describe two possible ways to determine the orientation of the X line from spacecraft data, one using the minimum gradient direction from Minimum Directional Derivative analysis at distances of the order of the current sheet thickness from the X line, and another using the bisection direction based on the asymptotic magnetic fields outside the current sheet. We discuss conditions for validity of these estimates, and we illustrate these conditions using several Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) events. We also show that intersection of a flux rope due to secondary reconnection with the primary X line can destroy invariance along the X line and negate the validity of a two‐dimensional description. -
Abstract We investigate the detailed properties of electron inflow in an electron-only reconnection event observed by the four Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft in the Earth's turbulent magnetosheath downstream of the quasi-parallel bow shock. The lack of ion coupling was attributed to the small-scale sizes of the current sheets, and the observed bidirectional super-Alfvénic electron jets indicate that the MMS spacecraft crossed the reconnecting current sheet on both sides of an active X-line. Remarkably, the MMS spacecraft observed the presence of large asymmetries in the two electron inflows, with the inflows (normal to the current sheet) on the two sides of the reconnecting current layer differing by as much as a factor of four. Furthermore, even though the four MMS spacecraft were separated by less than seven electron skin depths, the degree of inflow asymmetry was significantly different at the different spacecraft. The asymmetry in the inflow speeds was larger with increasing distances downstream from the reconnection site, and the asymmetry was opposite on the two sides of the X-line. We compare the MMS observations with a 2D kinetic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation and find that the asymmetry in the inflow speeds stems from in-plane currents generated via the combination of reconnection-mediated inflows and parallel flows along the magnetic separatrices in the presence of a large guide field.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acd4ba
