More Like this

1. Enhancing the Success of Minority STEM Students by Providing Financial, Academic, Social, and Cultural Capital

   Enriquez, A. G.; Lipe, C. B.; Price, B. (June 2017, ASEE annual conference & exposition)

   Research has shown that student achievement is influenced by their access to, or possession of, various forms of capital. These forms of capital include financial capital, academic capital (prior academic preparation and access to academic support services), cultural capital (the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors related to education which students are exposed to by members of their family or community), and social capital (the resources students have access to as a result of being members of groups or networks). For community college students, many with high financial need and the first in their families to go to college (especially those from underrepresented minority groups), developing programs to increase access to these various forms of capital is critical to their success. This paper describes how a small federally designated Hispanic-serving community college has developed a scholarship program for financially needy community college students intending to transfer to a four-year institution to pursue a bachelor’s degree in a STEM field. Developed through a National Science Foundation Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) grant, the program involves a collaboration among STEM faculty, college staff, administrators, student organizations, and partners in industry, four-year institutions, local high schools, and professional organizations. In addition to providing financial support through the scholarships, student access to academic capital is increased through an intensive math review program, tutoring, study groups, supplemental instruction, and research internship opportunities. Access to cultural and social capital is increased by providing scholars with faculty mentors; engaging students with STEM faculty, university researchers, and industry professionals through field trips, summer internships, professional organizations, and student clubs; supporting student and faculty participation at professional conferences, and providing opportunities for students and their families to interact with faculty and staff. The paper details the development of the program, and its impact over the last five years on enhancing the success of STEM students as determined from data on student participation in various program activities, student attitudinal and self-efficacy surveys, and academic performance including persistence, retention, transfer and graduation. 

   more » « less
2. Increasing STEM Belonging and Building Social Capital for Faculty and Student Success

   https://doi.org/10.55632/pwvas.v97i2.1115  

   Moats, Ella; Darrah, Marjorie; Humbert, Roxanne (April 2025, Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science)

   While many institutions are focusing on increasing STEM belonging for students, we argue that supporting faculty will increase STEM belonging and build social capital, which is vital for career growth and collaboration, creating stability for student success. Faculty at small and large institutions may struggle to find a community of STEM professionals where they feel they belong. Faculty members may struggle with the lack of connections to others in their field and miss out on support that helps them succeed in their careers. When faculty lack support, they may even leave an institution because of failure to get promotion or tenure. This in turn causes problems for students relying on the faculty for guidance and identity. We contend that the improvement science initiatives and other activities of the First2 Network, an NSF funded project, build connections in the STEM community in WV, help STEM students persist in their given field and build STEM belonging and social capital for the faculty members involved. Thus, providing a more stable environment for students to flourish. We surveyed faculty and found that the First2 Network had a positive influence on faculty members’ STEM Belonging, and on their development of social capital to further their academic careers. The faculty also provided examples of how their participation in improvement science work has contributed to their professional growth and benefited students at their institution. 

   more » « less
3. Board 301: Impacts of the ProQual Institute: Summative Evaluation of Participant Skills, Perceptions, Confidence, and Research Products from a Qualitative Research Institute

   https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--46879  

   Morelock, John; Reid, Aileen; Boyce, Ayesha Sherita; Janaki, Chaturved; Sochacka, Nicola; Walther, Joachim (June 2024, ASEE Conferences)

   Building on work presented at ASEE 2023, this NSF Grantees Poster Session paper reports on the impacts of the [NSF Project]—a $1M NSF award via the NSF ECR-EHR Core Research program in 2019—as it nears the end of its final year. The [NSF Project] aims to build national capacity for STEM education research by engaging technical STEM from across the U.S. in cohorts that participate in a semester-long course on qualitative and mixed methods educational research techniques. Faculty from underrepresented backgrounds and Minority-Serving Institutions were given priority consideration in terms of recruitment and admission to participate in the project. This project was funded based on impact rather than knowledge generation; thus, this paper will report on the [NSF Projects]’s summative outcomes and impact revealed through external evaluation. Using the Qualifying Qualitative Research Quality (Q3) framework pioneered by Dr. Joachim Walther and colleagues as a foundation, the project team guided three cohorts of faculty (48 faculty total) in designing qualitative or mixed methods studies to address research questions they wanted to answer about their educational contexts. The project team has also hosted four follow-up research incubators (each one semester long) as spaces to allow graduates of the [program] to continue working together as a community to continue developing educational research projects to completion or apply for extramural funding opportunities (serving 27 faculty total.) Furthermore, the team has funded graduates of the [program] to lead communities of practice focused on areas of shared research interest among graduates. Finally, in the past year, the team has funded professional grant proposal coaching for interested graduates and has worked with graduates to design and execute workshops on the [program’s] approach to qualitative research design. The evaluation results presented in this paper derive from a primarily quantitative, mixed methods survey conducted by the project’s external evaluators. The survey aimed to gauge participants' engagement with [program] activities; their knowledge, perceptions of, and comfort with qualitative and mixed methods; assessment of training outcomes and curriculum; the influence of [program] training on research dissemination; and self-reported behavioral changes before and after training. Results indicate substantial self-reported improvement in knowledge of qualitative research methods, as well as application of those methods and confidence to do so. Many participants have gone on to pursue funded research projects using qualitative and mixed methods research approaches, and many have reported increased capacity to collaborate on and disseminate research projects successfully. Constructively, the results point to a need to support nascent qualitative researchers in attending educational research conferences and integrating into these conferences’ communities. Participants also indicated a desire for more practical experience with real-world qualitative research scenarios, pointing to a need for further hands-on professional development opportunities. Overall, the survey paints a picture of a successful program that nearly all respondents reported as being worthwhile and a desire from participants to continue seeking opportunities to grow as qualitative and mixed methods researchers. 

   more » « less
4. Leveraging Social Capital to Broaden Participation in STEM

   https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219895997  

   Saw, Guan K. (March 2020, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences)

   Broadening participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is critical to the nation’s economic growth and national security. In K–12 and higher education, researchers and educators increasingly employ the concept of social capital to develop programs for improving STEM learning, motivation, and participation of young students. STEM social capital in education comprises STEM-oriented resources—whether instrumental, informational, or emotional—that students access through their social networks. Major theoretical perspectives, research evidence, and promising practices are associated with the concepts of social capital in STEM education. Students’ social capital in STEM education (derived from families, peers, teachers, and professional networks) demonstrably promotes their STEM educational outcomes and career paths. Inclusive STEM schools, mentoring, and after-school programs are some promising approaches that can enhance STEM social capital and outcomes of underrepresented students, particularly women, Blacks/Hispanics/Native Americans, youth with low socioeconomic status, and persons with disabilities. 

   more » « less
5. Work in Progress: The Power of Cross-Institutional ”Speed” Mentoring and Networking Program in Advancement of Women, URM, and Foreign Born/Trained Engineering Faculty

   Sadrinezhad, Arezoo; Oka, Lalita; Stillmaker, Kimberly; Thompson, Lizabeth; Cardenas, Catalina; Rosser, Sue; Nazari, Maryam; Abercromby, Kira (June 2023, Proceedings ASEE annual conference)

   Mentoring interventions, particularly mentoring that incorporates networking, have been effective at meeting the professional needs of women and under-represented minority (URM) faculty. However, women, especially URM women, in STEM careers report feeling left out of networks and thus face decreased social and administrative support. The isolation of women, especially URM women, in engineering in the California State University (CSU) System is apparent in the fact that many CSU engineering departments have only a few women faculty and no more than a single URM woman faculty. Thus, despite current mentoring programs at each CSU campus, there is only a few (if any) other women within their engineering department with whom they may discuss shared experiences. As part of the NSF funded ADVANCE Partnership grant, “Kindling Inter-university Networks for Diverse (KIND) Engineering Faculty Advancement in the California State University System”, in order to address this isolation and to provide mentoring and networking opportunities for women engineering faculty in the CSU system, particularly woman who identify as URM, a series of virtual (to enable cross-campus mentoring), small group setting (to incorporate networking) mentoring events was organized. Another aspect of this initiative emphasizes foreign-born (FB) or foreign-trained (FT) women, a unique focus. Although the speed mentoring events are open to all engineering faculty in the CSU system, there is specific emphasis on those who are normally excluded from formal mentoring. In this paper, the post-event survey results which include the demographics of the participants are reported and the importance and impact of these events are discussed. 

   more » « less