Tidal salt marshes produce and emit CH4. Therefore, it is critical to understand the biogeochemical controls that regulate CH4spatial and temporal dynamics in wetlands. The prevailing paradigm assumes that acetoclastic methanogenesis is the dominant pathway for CH4production, and higher salinity concentrations inhibit CH4production in salt marshes. Recent evidence shows that CH4is produced within salt marshes via methylotrophic methanogenesis, a process not inhibited by sulfate reduction. To further explore this conundrum, we performed measurements of soil–atmosphere CH4and CO2fluxes coupled with depth profiles of soil CH4and CO2pore water gas concentrations, stable and radioisotopes, pore water chemistry, and microbial community composition to assess CH4production and fate within a temperate tidal salt marsh. We found unexpectedly high CH4concentrations up to 145,000 μmol mol−1positively correlated with S2−(salinity range: 6.6–14.5 ppt). Despite large CH4production within the soil, soil–atmosphere CH4fluxes were low but with higher emissions and extreme variability during plant senescence (84.3 ± 684.4 nmol m−2 s−1). CH4and CO2within the soil pore water were produced from young carbon, with most Δ14C‐CH4and Δ14C‐CO2values at or above modern. We found evidence that CH4within soils was produced by methylotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Several pathways exist after CH4is produced, including diffusion into the atmosphere, CH4oxidation, and lateral export to adjacent tidal creeks; the latter being the most likely dominant flux. Our findings demonstrate that CH4production and fluxes are biogeochemically heterogeneous, with multiple processes and pathways that can co‐occur and vary in importance over the year. This study highlights the potential for high CH4production, the need to understand the underlying biogeochemical controls, and the challenges of evaluating CH4budgets and blue carbon in salt marshes.
Lakes emit globally significant amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere, but quantifying these rates for individual lakes is extremely challenging. The exchange of CO2across the air‐water interface is driven by physical, chemical, and biological processes in both the lake and the atmosphere that vary at multiple spatial and temporal scales. None of the methods we use to estimate CO2flux fully capture this heterogeneous gas exchange. Here, we compared concurrent CO2flux estimates from a single lake based on commonly used methods. These include floating chambers (FCs), eddy covariance (EC), and two concentration gradient‐based methods labeled fixed (F‐
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10453181
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
- Volume:
- 125
- Issue:
- 12
- ISSN:
- 2169-8953
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract Lakes are conduits of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere; however, most efflux estimates for individual lakes are based on extrapolations from a limited number of locations. Within‐lake variability in carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) arises from differences in water sources, mixing, atmospheric exchange, and biogeochemical transformations, all of which vary across multiple temporal and spatial scales. We asked, how variable are CO2and CH4across the surface of a single lake, how do spatial patterns change seasonally, and how well does the typical sampling location represent the entire lake surface? During the 2016 ice‐free period, we mapped surface water concentrations of CO2and CH4approximately weekly in Lake Mendota (USA) and modeled diffusive gas exchange. During stratification, CO2was generally lower than atmospheric saturation (mean 19.81 μM) and relatively homogenous (mean coefficient of variation 0.12), whereas CH4was routinely extremely supersaturated (mean 0.29 μM) with greater spatial heterogeneity (mean coefficient of variation 0.65). During fall mixis, concentrations of both gases increased and became more spatially variable, but their spatial arrangements differed. In this system, samples collected from the lake center reasonably well represented the spatially weighted mean CO2concentration but overestimated annual CO2efflux by 21%. For CH4, the lake center underestimated annual diffusive efflux by only 8.6% but poorly represented lakewide concentrations and fluxes on any given day. Upscaling from a single site to the whole lake requires consideration of spatial variation to assess lakewide carbon dynamics due to heterogeneity in within‐lake processing, transport to the lake surface, and exchange with the atmosphere.
-
more » « less
Abstract In limnological studies of temperate lakes, most studies of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions have focused on summer measurements of gas fluxes despite the importance of shoulder seasons to annual emissions. This is especially pertinent to dimictic, small lakes that maintain anoxic conditions and turnover quickly in the spring and fall. We examined CO2and CH4dynamics from January to October 2020 in a small humic lake in northern Wisconsin, United States through a combination of discrete sampling and high frequency buoy and eddy covariance data collection. Eddy covariance flux towers were installed on buoys at the center of the lake while it was still frozen to continually measure CO2and CH4across seasons. Despite evidence for only partial turnover during the spring, there was still a notable 19‐day pulse of CH4emissions after lake ice melted with an average daytime flux rate of 8–30 nmol CH4m−2s−1. Our estimate of CH4emissions during the spring pulse was 16 mmol CH4m−2compared to 22 mmol CH4m−2during the stratified period from June to August. We did not observe a linear accumulation of gases under‐ice in our sampling period during the late winter, suggesting the complexity of this dynamic period and the emphasis for direct measurements throughout the ice‐covered period. The results of our study help to better understand the magnitude and timing of greenhouse gas emissions in a region expected to experience warmer winters with decreased ice duration.
-
more » « less
Abstract Spatial heterogeneities in soil hydrology have been confirmed as a key control on CO2and CH4fluxes in the Arctic tundra ecosystem. In this study, we applied a mechanistic ecosystem model, CLM‐Microbe, to examine the microtopographic impacts on CO2and CH4fluxes across seven landscape types in Utqiaġvik, Alaska: trough, low‐centered polygon (LCP) center, LCP transition, LCP rim, high‐centered polygon (HCP) center, HCP transition, and HCP rim. We first validated the CLM‐Microbe model against static‐chamber measured CO2and CH4fluxes in 2013 for three landscape types: trough, LCP center, and LCP rim. Model application showed that low‐elevation and thus wetter landscape types (i.e., trough, transitions, and LCP center) had larger CH4emissions rates with greater seasonal variations than high‐elevation and drier landscape types (rims and HCP center). Sensitivity analysis indicated that substrate availability for methanogenesis (acetate, CO2 + H2) is the most important factor determining CH4emission, and vegetation physiological properties largely affect the net ecosystem carbon exchange and ecosystem respiration in Arctic tundra ecosystems. Modeled CH4emissions for different microtopographic features were upscaled to the eddy covariance (EC) domain with an area‐weighted approach before validation against EC‐measured CH4fluxes. The model underestimated the EC‐measured CH4flux by 20% and 25% at daily and hourly time steps, suggesting the importance of the time step in reporting CH4flux. The strong microtopographic impacts on CO2and CH4fluxes call for a model‐data integration framework for better understanding and predicting carbon flux in the highly heterogeneous Arctic landscape.
-
more » « less
Abstract Small freshwater reservoirs are ubiquitous and likely play an important role in global greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets relative to their limited water surface area. However, constraining annual GHG fluxes in small freshwater reservoirs is challenging given their footprint area and spatially and temporally variable emissions. To quantify the GHG budget of a small (0.1 km2) reservoir, we deployed an Eddy covariance (EC) system in a small reservoir located in southwestern Virginia, USA over 2 years to measure carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes near‐continuously. Fluxes were coupled with in situ sensors measuring multiple environmental parameters. Over both years, we found the reservoir to be a large source of CO2(633–731 g CO2‐C m−2 yr−1) and CH4(1.02–1.29 g CH4‐C m−2 yr−1) to the atmosphere, with substantial sub‐daily, daily, weekly, and seasonal timescales of variability. For example, fluxes were substantially greater during the summer thermally stratified season as compared to the winter. In addition, we observed significantly greater GHG fluxes during winter intermittent ice‐on conditions as compared to continuous ice‐on conditions, suggesting GHG emissions from lakes and reservoirs may increase with predicted decreases in winter ice‐cover. Finally, we identified several key environmental variables that may be driving reservoir GHG fluxes at multiple timescales, including, surface water temperature and thermocline depth followed by fluorescent dissolved organic matter. Overall, our novel year‐round EC data from a small reservoir indicate that these freshwater ecosystems likely contribute a substantial amount of CO2and CH4to global GHG budgets, relative to their surface area.
