Patterned leaf coloration in plants generates remarkable diversity in nature, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unclear. Here, using RH1 mainly functions as an anthocyanin biosynthesis activator that specifically determines leaf marking formation depending on its C‐terminal activation motif. RH1 physically interacts with the Our findings reveal the molecular mechanism of the antagonistic gene paralogs RH1 and RH2 in determining anthocyanin leaf markings in
Petal pigmentation patterning is widespread in flowering plants. The genetics of these pattern elements has been of great interest for understanding the evolution of phenotypic diversification. Here, we investigate the genetic changes responsible for the evolution of an unpigmented petal element on a colored background. We used transcriptome analysis, gene expression assays, cosegregation in F2plants and functional tests to identify the gene(s) involved in petal coloration in We identified an R2R3‐MYB transcription factor (CgsMYB12) responsible for anthocyanin pigmentation of the basal region (‘cup’) in the petal of Distinct spatial patterns of
- PAR ID:
- 10454664
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- New Phytologist
- Volume:
- 229
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 0028-646X
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 1147-1162
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Summary Medicago truncatula leaf marking as a model, we show that the classicM. truncatula leaf anthocyanin spot trait depends on two R2R3 MYB paralogous regulators, RED HEART1 (RH1) and RH2.M. truncatula bHLH protein MtTT8 and the WDR family member MtWD40‐1, and this interaction facilitates RH1 function in leaf anthocyanin marking formation. RH2 has lost transcriptional activation activity, due to a divergent C‐terminal domain, but retains the ability to interact with the same partners, MtTT8 and MtWD40‐1, as RH1, thereby acting as a competitor in the regulatory complex and exerting opposite effects. Moreover, our results demonstrate that RH1 can activate its own expression and that RH2‐mediated competition can repressRH1 expression.M. truncatula , providing a multidimensional paralogous–antagonistic regulatory paradigm for fine‐tuning patterned pigmentation. -
Summary In this study, we investigate the genetic mechanisms responsible for the loss of anthocyanins in betalain‐pigmented Caryophyllales, considering our hypothesis of multiple transitions to betalain pigmentation.
Utilizing transcriptomic and genomic datasets across 357 species and 31 families, we scrutinize 18 flavonoid pathway genes and six regulatory genes spanning four transitions to betalain pigmentation. We examined evidence for hypotheses of wholesale gene loss, modified gene function, altered gene expression, and degeneration of the MBW (MYB‐bHLH‐WD40) trasnscription factor complex, within betalain‐pigmented lineages.
Our analyses reveal that most flavonoid synthesis genes remain conserved in betalain‐pigmented lineages, with the notable exception of
TT19 orthologs, essential for the final step in anthocyanidin synthesis, which appear to have been repeatedly and entirely lost. Additional late‐stage flavonoid pathway genes upstream ofTT19 also manifest strikingly reduced expression in betalain‐pigmented species. Additionally, we find repeated loss and alteration in the MBW transcription complex essential for canonical anthocyanin synthesis.Consequently, the loss and exclusion of anthocyanins in betalain‐pigmented species appear to be orchestrated through several mechanisms: loss of a key enzyme, downregulation of synthesis genes, and degeneration of regulatory complexes. These changes have occurred iteratively in Caryophyllales, often coinciding with evolutionary transitions to betalain pigmentation.
-
Summary The petal spur of the basal eudicot
Aquilegia is a key innovation associated with the adaptive radiation of the genus. Previous studies have shown that diversification ofAquilegia spur length can be predominantly attributed to variation in cell elongation. However, the genetic pathways that control the development of petal spurs are still being investigated.Here, we focus on a pair of closely related homologs of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR family,
AqARF6 andAqARF8 , to explore their roles inAquileiga coerulea petal spur development.Expression analyses of the two genes show that they are broadly expressed in vegetative and floral organs, but have relatively higher expression in petal spurs, particularly at later stages. Knockdown of the two
AqARF6 andAqARF8 transcripts using virus‐induced gene silencing resulted in largely petal‐specific defects, including a significant reduction in spur length due to a decrease in cell elongation. These spurs also exhibited an absence of nectar production, which was correlated with downregulation ofSTYLISH homologs that have previously been shown to control nectary development.This study provides the first evidence of
ARF6 /8 homolog‐mediated petal development outside the core eudicots. The genes appear to be specifically required for cell elongation and nectary maturation in theAquilegia petal spur. -
Summary Epigenetic modifications have emerged as an important mechanism underlying plant defence against pathogens. We examined the role of JMJ14, a Jumonji (JMJ) domain‐containing H3K4 demethylase
, in local and systemic plant immune responses in Arabidopsis.The function of JMJ14 in local or systemic defence response was investigated by pathogen growth assays and by analysing expression and H3K4me3 enrichments of key defence genes using qPCR and ChIP‐qPCR. Salicylic acid (SA) and pipecolic acid (Pip) levels were quantified and function of JMJ14 in SA‐ and Pip‐mediated defences was analysed in Col‐0 and
jmj14 plants.jmj14 mutants were compromised in both local and systemic defences. JMJ14 positively regulates pathogen‐induced H3K4me3 enrichment and expression of defence genes involved in SA‐ and Pip‐mediated defence pathways. Consequently, loss of JMJ14 results in attenuated defence gene expression and reduced Pip accumulation during establishment of systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Exogenous Pip partially restored SAR injmj14 plants, suggesting that JMJ14 regulated Pip biosynthesis and other downstream factors regulate SAR injmj14 plants.JMJ14 positively modulates defence gene expressions and Pip levels in Arabidopsis.
-
Summary Rhizobial lipochitooligosaccharidic Nod factors (NFs), specified by
nod genes, are the primary determinants of host specificity in the legume–Rhizobia symbiosis.We examined the nodulation ability of
Medicago truncatula cv Jemalong A17 andM. truncatula ssp.tricycla R108 with theSinorhizobium meliloti nodF/nodL mutant, which produces modified NFs. We then applied genetic and functional approaches to study the genetic basis and mechanism of nodulation of R108 by this mutant.We show that the
nodF/nodL mutant can nodulate R108 but not A17. Using genomics and reverse genetics, we identified a newly evolved, chimeric LysM receptor‐like kinase gene in R108,LYK2bis , which is responsible for the phenotype and can allow A17 to gain nodulation with thenodF/nodL mutant. We found thatLYK2bis is involved in nodulation by mutants producing nonO ‐acetylated NFs and interacts with the key receptor protein NFP. Many, but not all, naturalS. meliloti andS. medicae strains tested requireLYK2bis for efficient nodulation of R108.Our findings reveal that a newly evolved gene in R108,
LYK2bis , extends nodulation specificity to mutants producing nonO ‐acetylated NFs and is important for nodulation by many naturalSinorhizobia . Evolution of this gene may present an adaptive advantage to allow nodulation by a greater variety of strains.