skip to main content

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (NSF-PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 11:00 PM ET on Friday, May 17 until 8:00 AM ET on Saturday, May 18 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Sources of Uncertainty in Regional and Global Terrestrial CO 2 Exchange Estimates

The Global Carbon Budget 2018 (GCB2018) estimated by the atmospheric COgrowth rate, fossil fuel emissions, and modeled (bottom‐up) land and ocean fluxes cannot be fully closed, leading to a “budget imbalance,” highlighting uncertainties in GCB components. However, no systematic analysis has been performed on which regions or processes contribute to this term. To obtain deeper insight on the sources of uncertainty in global and regional carbon budgets, we analyzed differences in Net Biome Productivity (NBP) for all possible combinations of bottom‐up and top‐down data sets in GCB2018: (i) 16 dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), and (ii) 5 atmospheric inversions that match the atmospheric COgrowth rate. We find that the global mismatch between the two ensembles matches well the GCB2018 budget imbalance, with Brazil, Southeast Asia, and Oceania as the largest contributors. Differences between DGVMs dominate global mismatches, while at regional scale differences between inversions contribute the most to uncertainty. At both global and regional scales, disagreement on NBP interannual variability between the two approaches explains a large fraction of differences. We attribute this mismatch to distinct responses to El Niño–Southern Oscillation variability between DGVMs and inversions and to uncertainties in land use change emissions, especially in South America and Southeast Asia. We identify key needs to reduce uncertainty in carbon budgets: reducing uncertainty in atmospheric inversions (e.g., through more observations in the tropics) and in land use change fluxes, including more land use processes and evaluating land use transitions (e.g., using high‐resolution remote‐sensing), and, finally, improving tropical hydroecological processes and fire representation within DGVMs.

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10455022
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  more » ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;   « less
Publisher / Repository:
DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume:
34
Issue:
2
ISSN:
0886-6236
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Robust estimates of CO2budget, CO2exchanged between the atmosphere and terrestrial biosphere, are necessary to better understand the role of the terrestrial biosphere in mitigating anthropogenic CO2emissions. Over the past decade, this field of research has advanced through understanding of the differences and similarities of two fundamentally different approaches: “top‐down” atmospheric inversions and “bottom‐up” biosphere models. Since the first studies were undertaken, these approaches have shown an increasing level of agreement, but disagreements in some regions still persist, in part because they do not estimate the same quantity of atmosphere–biosphere CO2exchange. Here, we conducted a thorough comparison of CO2budgets at multiple scales and from multiple methods to assess the current state of the science in estimating CO2budgets. Our set of atmospheric inversions and biosphere models, which were adjusted for a consistent flux definition, showed a high level of agreement for global and hemispheric CO2budgets in the 2000s. Regionally, improved agreement in CO2budgets was notable for North America and Southeast Asia. However, large gaps between the two methods remained in East Asia and South America. In other regions, Europe, boreal Asia, Africa, South Asia, and Oceania, it was difficult to determine whether those regions act as a net sink or source because of the large spread in estimates from atmospheric inversions. These results highlight two research directions to improve the robustness of CO2budgets: (a) to increase representation of processes in biosphere models that could contribute to fill the budget gaps, such as forest regrowth and forest degradation; and (b) to reduce sink–source compensation between regions (dipoles) in atmospheric inversion so that their estimates become more comparable. Advancements on both research areas will increase the level of agreement between the top‐down and bottom‐up approaches and yield more robust knowledge of regional CO2budgets.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Global ocean mean salinityis a key indicator of the Earth's hydrological cycle and the exchanges of freshwater between land and ocean, but its determination remains a challenge. Aside from traditional methods based on gridded salinity fields derived from in situ measurements, we explore estimates ofbased on liquid freshwater changes derived from space gravimetry data corrected for sea ice effects. For the 2005–2019 period analyzed, the differentseries show little consistency in seasonal, interannual, and long‐term variability. In situ estimates show sensitivity to choice of product and unrealistic variations. A suspiciously large rise insince ∼2015 is enough to measurably affect halosteric sea level estimates and can explain recent discrepancies in the global mean sea level budget. Gravimetry‐basedestimates are more realistic, inherently consistent with estimated freshwater contributions to global mean sea level, and provide a way to calibrate the in situ estimates.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    The oxygen isotopic composition of planktic foraminiferal calcite () is one of the most prevalent proxies used in the paleoceanographic community. The relationship between, temperature, and seawater oxygen isotopic composition () is firmly rooted in thermodynamics, and experimental constraints are commonly used for sea surface temperature (SST) reconstructions. However, in marine sedimentary applications, additional sources of uncertainty emerge, and these uncertainty constraints have not as of yet been included in global calibration models. Here, we compile a global data set of over 2,600 marine sediment core top samples for five planktic species:Globigerinoides ruber,Trilobatus sacculifer,Globigerina bulloides,Neogloboquadrina incompta, andNeogloboquadrina pachyderma. We developed a suite of Bayesian regression models to calibrate the relationship betweenand SST. Spanning SSTs from 0.0 to 29.5 °C, our annual model with species pooled together has a mean standard error of approximately 0.54‰. Accounting for seasonality and species‐specific differences improves model validation, reducing the mean standard error to 0.47‰. Example applications spanning the Late Quaternary show good agreement with independent alkenone‐based estimates. Our pooled calibration model may also be used for reconstruction in the deeper geological past, using modern planktic foraminifera as an analog for non‐extant species. Our core top‐based models provide a robust assessment of uncertainty in thepaleothermometer that can be used in statistical assessments of interproxy and model‐proxy comparisons. The suite of models is publicly available as the Open Source software librarybayfox, for Python, R, and MATLAB/Octave.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    The Congo Basin hosts the world's second largest rainforest and is a major rainfall center. However, the primary sources of moisture needed to maintain this forest, either from evapotranspiration (ET) or advection from the ocean, remain unclear. We use satellite observations of the deuterium content of water vapor (), solar induced fluorescence (SIF), precipitation, and atmospheric reanalysis to examine the relative contribution of ET to moisture in the free troposphere. We find that SIF, an indicator of photosynthesis, covaries within early rainy seasons, suggesting that ET is an important contributor to atmospheric moisture in both the spring and fall rainy seasons. However, the relative contribution of ET to the free tropospheric moisture varies between the two rainy seasons. Observedrelative to a range of observationally constrained, isotopic mixing models representative of water vapor coming from land suggests thatof the free tropospheric moisture come from ET in February, andin April, versusin August andin October. Reanalysis indicate that this difference between seasons is due to increased advection of ocean air during the fall season, thus reducing the relative contribution of ET to the Congo Basin in the fall. In addition, ET is the primary atmospheric moisture source in the winter and summer dry seasons, consistent with estimates reported in literature. Our results highlight the importance of ET from the Congo rainforest as an important source of moisture for initiating the rainy seasons.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    While most observations indicate well‐buffered clouds to aerosol perturbations, global models do not. Among the suggested mechanisms for this discrepancy is the models' lack of connections between cloud droplet size and two processes that can contribute to reduced cloudiness when droplets become more numerous and smaller: evaporation and entrainment. In this study, we explore different implementations of size‐dependent evaporation and entrainment in the global atmospheric model CAM5.3‐Oslo. We study their impact on the preindustrial‐to‐present day change in liquid water path () and the corresponding aerosol indirect effect (). Impacts of the 2014–2015 fissure eruption in Holuhraun, Iceland, are also presented. Our entrainment modifications only have a moderate effect on(changes from1.07 W mto0.98 W m), and a small impact on the signal from the Holuhraun eruption compared to other suggested compensating mechanisms. Simulations with added size‐dependent evaporation in the top of the stratiform clouds also show small evaporation differences between PI and PD. Moderate changes inwere achieved when also including an entrainment feedback to the evaporation changes, mixing air between the cloudtop layer and the layer above. These changes were not associated with the size dependency, but changes in the cloud susceptibility to aerosols in both PI and PD when adding evaporation. We find that increased evaporation of smaller droplets at stratiform cloud tops can reduce, but can increasein some areas due to enhanced shallow convection caused by destabilization.

     
    more » « less