We report on the mountain top observation of three terrestrial gamma‐ray flashes (TGFs) that occurred during the summer storm season of 2021. To our knowledge, these are the first TGFs observed in a mountaintop environment and the first published European TGFs observed from the ground. A gamma‐ray sensitive detector was located at the base of the Säntis Tower in Switzerland and observed three unique TGF events with coincident radio sferic data characteristic of TGFs seen from space. We will show an example of a “slow pulse” radio signature (Cummer et al., 2011,
The iron (Fe) supply to phytoplankton communities in the Southern Ocean surface exerts a strong control on oceanic carbon storage and global climate. Hydrothermal vents are one potential Fe source to this region, but it is not known whether hydrothermal Fe persists in seawater long enough to reach the surface before it is removed by particle scavenging. A new study (Jenkins, 2020,
- Award ID(s):
- 1658042
- PAR ID:
- 10455580
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 20
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048099 ; Lu et al., 2011,https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016141 ; Pu et al., 2019,https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082743 ; Pu et al., 2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089427 ), a −EIP (Lyu et al., 2016,https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070154 ; Lyu et al., 2021,https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093627 ; Wada et al., 2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031730 ), and a double peak TGF associated with an extraordinarily powerful and complicated positive‐polarity sferic, where each TGF peak is possibly preceded by a short burst of stepped leader emission. -
Abstract The objective of this comment is to correct two sets of statements in Litwin et al. (2022,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006239 ), which consider our research work (Bonetti et al., 2018,https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0693 ; Bonetti et al., 2020,https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911817117 ). We clarify here that (a) the specific contributing area is defined in the limit of an infinitesimal contour length instead of the product of a reference contour width (Bonetti et al., 2018,https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0693 ), and (b) not all solutions obtained from the minimalist landscape evolution model of Bonetti et al. (2020,https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911817117 ) are rescaled copies of each other. We take this opportunity to demonstrate that the boundary conditions impact the obtained solutions, which has not been considered in the dimensional analysis of Litwin et al. (2022,https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006239 ). We clarify this point by using dimensional analysis and numerical simulations for a square domain, where only one horizontal length scale (the side lengthl ) enters the physical law. -
Abstract Recent advances in remote sensing of solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) have garnered wide interest from the biogeoscience and Earth system science communities, due to the observed linearity between SIF and gross primary productivity (GPP) at increasing spatiotemporal scales. Three recent studies, Maguire et al., (2020,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087858 ), He et al. (2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087474 ), and Marrs et al. (2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087956 ) highlight a nonlinear relationship between fluorescence and photochemical yields and show empirical evidence for the decoupling of SIF, stomata, and the carbon reactions of photosynthesis. Such mechanistic studies help advance our understanding of what SIF is and what it is not. We argue that these findings are not necessarily contradictory to the linear SIF‐GPP relationship observed at the satellite scale and provide context for where, when, and why fluorescence and photosynthesis diverge at smaller spatiotemporal scales. Understanding scale dependencies of remote sensing data is crucial for interpreting SIF as a proxy for GPP. -
Abstract This letter compares the predictions of two expressions proposed for the porosity evolution in the context of rate and state friction. One (Segall & Rice, 1995,
https://doi.org/10.1029/95jb02403 ) depends only on the sliding velocity; the other (Sleep, 1995,https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb03340 ) depends only on the state variable. Simulations of both are similar for velocity stepping and slide‐hold‐slide experiments. They differ significantly for normal effective stress jumps at constant sliding velocity. Segall and Rice (1995,https://doi.org/10.1029/95jb02403 ) predicts no change in the porosity; Sleep (1995,https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb03340 ) does. Simulation with a spring‐block model indicates that the magnitude of rapid slip events is essentially the same for the two formulations. Variations of porosity and induced pore pressure near rapid slip events are similar and consistent with experimental observations. Predicted porosity variations during slow slip intervals and the time at which rapid slip events occur are significantly different. The simulation indicates that changes in friction stress due to pore pressure changes exceed those due to rate and state effects. -
Abstract We show that atmospheric gravity waves can generate plasma ducts and irregularities in the plasmasphere using the coupled SAMI3/WACCM‐X model. We find the equatorial electron density is irregular as a function of longitude which is consistent with CRRES measurements (Clilverd et al., 2007,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007ja012416 ). We also find that plasma ducts can be generated forL ‐shells in the range 1.5–3.0 with lifetimes of ∼ 0.5 hr; this is in line with observations of ducted VLF wave propagation with lifetimes of 0.5–2.0 hr (Clilverd et al., 2008,https://doi.org/10.1029/2007ja012602 ; Singh et al., 1998,https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6826(98)00001-7 ).