We use observations from the Quinault River, a small river that flows into an energetic surf zone on the West Coast of Washington state, to investigate the interaction between river and wave forcing. By synthesizing data from moorings, drifters, and Unmanned Aerial System video, we develop a conceptual model of this interaction based on three length scales: the surf zone width,
- PAR ID:
- 10455816
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Volume:
- 124
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 2169-9275
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 8060-8078
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
We use salinity observations from drifters and moorings at the Quinault River mouth to investigate mixing and stratification in a surf-zone-trapped river plume. We quantify mixing based on the rate of change of salinity DS/Dt in the drifters’ quasi-Lagrangian reference frame. We estimate a constant value of the vertical eddy diffusivity of salt of Kz=(2.2 +/- 0.6) x 10^-3 m^2 s^-1, based on the relationship between vertically integrated DS/Dt and stratification, with values as high as 1 x 10^-2 m^2 s^-1 when stratification is low. Mixing, quantified as DS/Dt, is directly correlated to surf-zone stratification, and is therefore modulated by changes in stratification caused by tidal variability in freshwater volume flux. High DS/Dt is observed when the near-surface stratification is high and salinity gradients are collocated with wave-breaking turbulence. We observe a transition from low stratification and low DS/Dt at low tidal stage to high stratification and high DS/Dt at high tidal stage. Observed wave-breaking turbulence does not change significantly with stratification, tidal stage, or offshore wave height; as a result, we observe no relationship between plume mixing and offshore wave height for the range of conditions sampled. Thus, plume mixing in the surf zone is altered by changes in stratification; these are due to tidal variability in freshwater flux from the river and not wave conditions, presumably because depth-limited wave breaking causes sufficient turbulence for mixing to occur during all observed conditions.more » « less
-
Abstract In contrast to large river plumes, Coriolis effects are weak, and inertia is quickly depleted so that the fate and structure of small‐scale plumes are more sensitive to tide and wind. Advected alongshore by reversing tidal currents in absence of wind forcing, small buoyant plumes are persistently deflected downwind in presence of alongshore winds and exhibit little tidal variability. The effect of different upwelling/downwelling winds on buoyant outflows ∼10 m3 s−1is explored. With increasing wind, tidal variability decreases, as does asymmetry in plume characteristics—for strong winds upwelling/downwelling plume structure is similar as the plume is retained closer to the shore. Wind forcing is exerted directly by wind stress on the surface of the plume and indirectly by wind‐driven currents that deflect the upwind boundary of the plume. While inertia and buoyancy dominate the inner plume, and wind dominates the outer plume, the mid‐plume responds to an interaction of wind and buoyancy forcing that can be indexed by a Plume Wedderburn Number
W pl (wind stress vs. density gradients): for weaker winds (W pl < 1) surface stress enhances stratification through straining, lengthening the reach of low‐salinity waters, whereas for stronger winds (W pl > 1) surface stress mixes the plume vertically, shortening the reach of low‐salinity waters. However, dilute plume waters extend furthest in strong winds, passively advected several kilometers downwind. Shoreline exposure to outflow transitions from a quasi‐symmetrical tide‐averaged zone of impact under zero‐wind to a heavily skewed zone with persistent weak wind and a one‐sided zone for strong wind. -
Abstract The Connecticut River plume is influenced by energetic ambient tides in the Long Island Sound receiving waters. The objectives of this modeling study are (a) characterizing the spatial heterogeneity of turbulent buoyancy fluxes, (b) partitioning turbulent buoyancy fluxes into bottom‐generated and interfacial shear contributions, and (c) quantifying contributions to plume‐integrated mixing within the tidal plume. The plume formed during ambient flood tides under low river discharge, spring tides, and no winds is analyzed. Turbulent buoyancy fluxes (
B ) and depth‐integratedB through the plume (Bd ) are characterized by pronounced spatial heterogeneity. Strong mixing (Bd ∼ 10−5‐10−4 m3/s3) occurs near the mouth, in the nearfield plume turning region, over shoals, and nearshore shallow areas. Low to moderate mixing (Bd ∼ 10−8‐10−6 m3/s3) occupies half the plume. Buoyancy fluxes are first partitioned based on the depth of the shear stress minimum between plume‐generated and bottom‐generated shear maxima. Four other tested partitioning methods are based on open channel flow and stratified shear flow parameterizations. Interfacial and bottom‐generated shear contribute to different areas of intense and moderate mixing. All methods indicate a significant plume mixing role for bottom‐generated mixing, but interfacial mixing is a bigger contributor. Plume‐integrated total and interfacial mixing peak at max ambient flood and the timing of peak bottom‐generated mixing varies among partitioning methods. Two‐thirds of the mixing occurs in concentrated intense mixing areas. A parameter space with the ambient tidal Froude number and plume thickness to depth ratio as axes indicates many tidally modulated plumes are moderately to dominantly influenced by bottom‐generated tidal mixing. -
Abstract Transient rip currents drive cross‐shore transport of nutrients, larvae, sediment, and other particulate matter. These currents are driven by short‐crested wave breaking, which is associated with rotational wave‐breaking forces (vorticity forcing) that generate horizontal rotational motions (eddies) at small scales. Energy from small‐scale eddies is transferred to larger‐scale eddies that interact and enhance cross‐shore exchange. Previous numerical modeling work on planar beaches has shown that cross‐shore exchange increases with increasing wave directional spread, but this relationship is not established for barred beaches, and processes connecting the wavefield to cross‐shore exchange are not well constrained. We investigate surf‐zone eddy processes using numerical simulations (FUNWAVE‐TVD) and large‐scale laboratory observations of varying offshore wave directional spreads (0 to ) and peak period (1.5–2.5 s) on an alongshore uniform barred beach. We find that mean breaking crest length decreases, while crest end density (number of crest ends in a given area) increases, with increasing directional spread. In contrast, vorticity forcing, offshore low‐frequency rotational motion, and cross‐shore exchange peak at intermediate directional spreads . Distributions of the strength of vorticity forcing per crest and across the surf zone suggest that the peak in vorticity forcing at intermediate spreads results from a combination of a larger total breaking area and relatively long crests with large forcing, despite a lower total number of crests. However, low‐frequency rotational motion within the surf zone does not peak at mid‐directional spread, instead plateauing at directional spreads greater than . Results suggest that eddy‐eddy interaction, the transformation of vorticity across the surf zone, and influence of bathymetry are fruitful topics for future work.
-
Abstract The fate of discharges from small rivers and mountainous streams are little studied relative to the dynamics of large river plumes. Flows from small watersheds are episodic, forming transient low‐salinity surface plumes that vary tidally due to interaction of outflow inertia with buoyancy and ambient tidal currents. An implementation of the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS v3.0), a three‐dimensional, free‐surface, terrain‐following numerical model, is applied to small river outflows (≤10 m3 s−1) entering a tidal ocean, where they form small plumes of scale ~103 m or smaller. Analysis of the momentum balance points to three distinct zones: (i) an inertia‐driven near field, where advection, pressure gradient, and vertical stress divergence control the plume dynamics, (ii) a buoyancy‐driven midfield, where pressure gradient, lateral stress divergence, and rotational accelerations are dominant, and (iii) an advective far field, where local accelerations induced by ambient tidal currents determine the fate of the river/estuarine discharge. The response of these small tidal plumes to different buoyancy forcing and outflow rate is explored. With increasing buoyancy, plumes change from narrow/elongated, bottom‐attached flows to radially expanding, surface‐layer flows. Weak outflow promotes stratification within the plume layer, and with stronger outflow, the plume layer becomes thinner and well‐mixed. When compared with prototypical large‐river plumes in which Coriolis effects are important, (i) in these small plumes, there is no bulge and no coastal buoyancy current, that is, shore contact is mostly absent, and (ii) the plume is strongly influenced by ambient tidal currents, forming a tidal plume that is deflected upcoast/downcoast from the river mouth.