skip to main content


Title: Integrating vital rates explains optimal worker size for resource return by bumblebee workers
Abstract

Size‐number trade‐offs in reproduction are commonly observed in nature. Bumblebee (Bombusspp.) colonies produce workers that vary considerably in size. This variation suggests that colonies face potential size‐number trade‐offs when producing workers.

Here, we estimated size‐based vital rates ofBombus vosnesenskiiworkers using colonies reared from wild‐caught queens. We conducted a mark–recapture study to estimate worker survival as a function of body size. We also collected data on pollen and nectar loads as well as foraging trips using a radiofrequency identification system to estimate daily resource return as a function of body size. We integrated survival and daily resource return to estimate lifetime resource collection and offset these estimates by the size‐based worker production costs.

We found size‐based trade‐offs among workers of different sizes. Smaller workers had higher survival, but larger workers returned with more resources per day. The largest workers made slightly fewer foraging trips per day.

Overall, larger workers made the greatest lifetime contribution to both nectar and pollen collection. However, once the benefits of larger workers are offset by their higher production costs, intermediate‐sized workers were the optimal for net resource contribution according to our models. Many previous studies have found that larger workers outperformed smaller workers with foraging and in‐nest tasks, yet these studies have not integrated multiple fitness components or worker production costs to quantify net resource contribution towards colony growth.

Accounting for trade‐offs between costs and performance changed our conclusions about optimal body size from being large to being near the observed average.  Similar approaches of integrating multiple vital rates may resolve apparently suboptimal life histories in other taxa.

Aplain language summaryis available for this article.

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10458470
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Functional Ecology
Volume:
33
Issue:
3
ISSN:
0269-8463
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 467-478
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Pathogen transmission between domesticated and wild host species has important implications for community ecology, agriculture, and wildlife conservation. Bumble bees provide valuable pollination services that are vital for both wildflowers and agricultural production. Intense concerns about pathogen spillover from commercial bumble bees to wild bee populations, and the potential harmful effects of pathogen spillback to commercial bees, has stimulated a need for practical strategies that effectively manage bumble bee infectious diseases. Here, we assessed the costs and benefits of a medicinal sunflower pollen diet (Helianthusannuus) on whole‐colony bumble bee disease and performance using commercial colonies of the common eastern bumble bee,Bombus impatiens, and its protozoan pathogen,Crithidia bombi(Trypanosomatida). We first found that a 1:1 mixture of sunflower combined with wildflower pollen reducedC. bombiinfection prevalence and intensity within individualB. impatiensworkers by nearly 4‐fold and 12‐fold, respectively, relative to wildflower pollen. At the colony level, a 1:1 mixture of sunflower and wildflower pollen reducedC. bombiinfection prevalence by 11% averaged over a 10‐week period and infection intensity by 30% relative to wildflower pollen. Colony performance was similar between pollen diets and infection treatments, including the number of workers and immatures produced, and size and weight of workers, drones, and queens. Infection significantly reduced the probability of queen production in colonies fed a pure wildflower pollen diet, but not colonies fed a mixed sunflower pollen diet, suggesting that the medicinal benefits of a mixed sunflower pollen diet can reverse the negative effects of infection on reproductive success. This study provides evidence that sunflower pollen as part of a mixed pollen diet can reduce infection in individual bees and whole colonies with no significant nutritional trade‐offs for colony worker production and most aspects of colony reproduction. A supplemental mixed sunflower pollen diet may provide a simple and effective solution to reduce disease and improve the health of economically and ecologically important pollinators.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    In flowering plants that produce concealed rewards, pollinator foraging preferences may select for floral advertisement traits that are correlated with rewards. To date, studies have not focused on the potential for honest signals to vary across populations, which could occur due to differences in pollinator communities or plant mating system.

    We tested for variation in honest signals across and within populations and mating systems inArabis alpina, a broadly distributed arctic‐alpine perennial herb that is visited by a variable community of insects. In a greenhouse common garden, we tested for correlations between corolla area, floral scent and nectar volume in 29 populations. In 12 field populations, we examined variation in pollen limitation and corolla area.

    Across and within populations and mating systems, larger flowers generally produced more nectar. Total scent emission was not correlated with nectar production, but two compounds—phenylacetaldehyde and benzyl alcohol—may be honest signals in some populations. Corolla area was correlated with pollen limitation only across populations.

    Our results suggest that honest signals may be similar across populations but may not result from contemporary direct selection on floral advertisements.

    Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Understanding the fitness consequences of different life histories is critical for explaining their diversity and for predicting effects of changing environmental conditions. However, current theory on plant life histories relies on phenomenological, rather than mechanistic, models of resource production.

    We combined a well‐supported mechanistic model of ontogenetic growth that incorporates differences in the size‐dependent scaling of gross resource production and maintenance costs with a dynamic optimization model to predict schedules of reproduction and prolonged dormancy (plants staying below ground for ≥1 growing season) that maximize lifetime offspring production.

    Our model makes three novel predictions: First, maintenance costs strongly influence the conditions under which a monocarpic or polycarpic life history evolves and how resources should be allocated to reproduction by polycarpic plants. Second, in contrast to previous theory, our model allows plants to compensate for low survival conditions by allocating a larger proportion of resources to storage and thereby improving overwinter survival. Incorporating this ecological mechanism in the model is critically important because without it our model never predicts significant investment into storage, which is inconsistent with empirical observations. Third, our model predicts that prolonged dormancy may evolve solely in response to resource allocation trade‐offs.

    Significance. Our findings reveal that maintenance costs and the effects of resource allocation on survival are primary determinants of the fitness consequences of different life history strategies, yet previous theory on plant life history evolution has largely ignored these factors. Our findings also validate recent arguments that prolonged dormancy may be an optimal response to costs of sprouting. These findings have broad implications for understanding patterns of plant life history variation and predicting plant responses to changing environments.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Floral odours play an important role in attracting insect pollinators. Because pollinators visit flowers to obtain pollen and nectar rewards, they should prefer floral odour profiles associated with the highest‐rewarding flowers (honest signals). In previous work, bumblebees exhibited a preference for flowers from outbred over inbredMimulus guttatusplants. Pollen is the only floral reward inM. guttatus, and pollen viability (a reliable indicator of protein content) is reduced in inbred plants. Yet, differences in pollen viability did not explain the observed preferences.

    In this study, we examined the floral volatile profiles of inbred and outbredM. guttatusto identify inbreeding effects and associations between volatile compounds and the number of viable pollen grains per flower, designated “PRQ” (pollen reward quality). We also conducted pairwise choice tests withBombus impatiensto evaluate the ability of bees to discriminate between odours of rewarding and non‐rewarding flowers and to determine whether bumblebee preferences are explained by differences in the floral odours of inbred and outbred plants.

    Inbred plants exhibited reduced emission of β‐trans‐bergamotene, the second‐most abundant compound in the volatile blend of outbred plants. Furthermore, pollen and fertile anthers emitted nonadecane. Six other compounds in the floral blend were positively correlated withPRQ. There was no overlap between compounds affected by inbreeding and compounds associated withPRQ.

    Even when given prior experience foraging onM. guttatus, bumblebees did not distinguish between the floral odours of rewarding and non‐rewarding outbred plants. However, they preferred floral odours from non‐rewarding outbred plants over rewarding inbred plants. Bumblebees without prior experience of flowers preferred volatile blends with higher versus lower amounts of β‐trans‐bergamotene.

    Taken together, these results suggest that the volatile emissions ofM. guttatusprovide reliable indicators of pollen rewards (potential honest signals), but that the preference of bumblebees for outbred plants is not driven by these cues but rather by a sensory bias for β‐trans‐bergamotene. This may represent a subtle form of deceit‐pollination that allows plants to attract pollinators while minimizing investment in costly rewards.

    Aplain language summaryis available for this article.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Behavior and organization of social groups is thought to be vital to the functioning of societies, yet the contributions of various roles within social groups toward population growth and dynamics have been difficult to quantify. A common approach to quantifying these role‐based contributions is evaluating the number of individuals conducting certain roles, which ignores how behavior might scale up to effects at the population‐level. Manipulative experiments are another common approach to determine population‐level effects, but they often ignore potential feedbacks associated with these various roles.

    Here, we evaluate the effects of worker size distribution in bumblebee colonies on worker production in 24 observational colonies across three environments, using functional linear models. Functional linear models are an underused correlative technique that has been used to assess lag effects of environmental drivers on plant performance. We demonstrate potential applications of this technique for exploring high‐dimensional ecological systems, such as the contributions of individuals with different traits to colony dynamics.

    We found that more larger workers had mostly positive effects and more smaller workers had negative effects on worker production. Most of these effects were only detected under low or fluctuating resource environments suggesting that the advantage of colonies with larger‐bodied workers becomes more apparent under stressful conditions.

    We also demonstrate the wider ecological application of functional linear models. We highlight the advantages and limitations when considering these models, and how they are a valuable complement to many of these performance‐based and manipulative experiments.

     
    more » « less