skip to main content

Title: Biological invasion: The influence of the hidden side of the (epi)genome

Understanding the mechanisms underlying biological invasions and rapid adaptation to global change remains a fundamental challenge, particularly in small populations lacking in genetic variation. Two understudied mechanisms that could facilitate adaptive evolution and adaptive plasticity are the increased genetic variation due to transposable elements (TEs), and associated or independent modification of gene expression through epigenetic changes.

Here, we focus on the potential role of these genetic and non‐genetic mechanisms for facilitating invasion success. Because novel or stressful environments are known to induce both epigenetic changes and TE activity, these mechanisms may play an underappreciated role in generating phenotypic and genetic variation for selection to act on. We review how these mechanisms operate, the evidence for how they respond to novel or stressful environments, and how these mechanisms can contribute to the success of biological invasions by facilitating adaptive evolution and phenotypic plasticity.

Because genetic and phenotypic variations due to TEs and epigenetic changes are often well regulated or “hidden” in the native environment, the independent and combined contribution of these mechanisms may only become important when populations colonize novel environments. A focus on the mechanisms that generate and control the expression of this variation in new environments may provide insights into biological invasions that would otherwise not be obvious.

Global changes and human activities impact on ecosystems and allow new opportunities for biological invasions. Invasive species succeed by adapting rapidly to new environments. The degree to which rapid responses to environmental change could be mediated by the epigenome—the regulatory system that integrates how environmental and genomic variation jointly shape phenotypic variation—requires greater attention if we want to understand the mechanisms by which populations successfully colonize and adapt to new environments.

A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

more » « less
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;
Publisher / Repository:
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Functional Ecology
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 385-400
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Phenotypic variation within populations is influenced by the environment via plasticity and natural selection. How phenotypes respond to the environment can vary among traits, populations and life stages in ways that can influence fitness.

    Plastic responses during early development are particularly important because they can affect components of fitness throughout an individual's life. Consequently, how natural selection shapes developmental plasticity could be influenced by fitness consequences across different life stages. Moreover, spatial variation in selection pressures could generate differences in plastic responses among populations.

    To gain insight into sources of variation in phenotypes and survival, we used a laboratory egg incubation experiment using brown anole lizardsAnolis sagreifrom mainland (ancestral) and island (descendent) populations, combined with a mark–release–recapture experiment in the field. Our study was designed to (a) quantify the effects developmental temperature on embryo development and offspring morphology, (b) assess how developmental temperature influences offspring survival across different life stages and (c) quantify how thermal reaction norms vary among ancestral and descendant populations.

    Developmental temperature influenced offspring morphology, but thermal reaction norms of embryos showed little variation among populations. Developmental temperature influenced offspring survival, but the patterns differed between embryo and hatchling stages; the optimal temperature for embryos was about 5℃ lower than that for hatchlings. High temperatures were thermally stressful to embryos, but they reduced incubation duration and led to early hatching. In turn, earlier hatching increased the probability of survival to adulthood. Moreover, the effect of developmental temperature on hatchling survival was most pronounced for offspring that hatched late in the season.

    The difference in optimal developmental temperatures between life stages may be driven by physiological tolerance for embryos and by ecological factors for hatchlings. Moreover, the fitness consequences of the developmental environment depend on the phenology of hatching. Overall, these results highlight how the developmental environment can differentially affect fitness across life stages and show that temporal thermal heterogeneity can influence survival of embryos, but the consequences on post‐hatching stages may vary at different times of the season.

    A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Much research has shown that environmental stress can induce adaptive and maladaptive phenotypic changes in organisms that persist for multiple generations. Such transgenerational phenotypic plasticity shrouds our understanding of the long‐term consequences of ongoing anthropogenic pressures.

    Here, we evaluated within‐ and transgenerational phenotypic responses to food stress in the freshwater crustacean,Daphnia. We reared 45 clones ofDaphnia pulicariaeach on high‐qualityScenedesmusand low‐quality (but also non‐toxic) cyanobacteria (generation 1). Offspring produced by generation 1 adults were then reared onScenedesmus(generation 2), and life‐history traits were measured across both generations.

    The results show thatDaphniain generation 1 exhibited reduced fitness (i.e., delayed maturation, lower reproductive output, increased clutch interval) when reared in the presence of cyanobacteria as opposed to high‐quality food. However, maternal stress had no clear influence on the fitness of offspring. That is,Daphniain the second experimental generation had similar mean trait values, irrespective of whether their mothers were reared on cyanobacteria or high‐quality food.

    Signals of transgenerational life‐history effects were obscured, in part, by extensive clonal variation amongDaphniain the direction of transgenerational responses to cyanobacteria (i.e., adaptive and maladaptive plasticity). Further analyses demonstrated that such individual variance in plasticity might be open to selection and potentially offer a means of contemporary adaptation to cyanobacteria. Taken together, our results denote a link between the overall strength of transgenerational responses to the environment and the potential for rapid evolution in populations.

    A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Plant functional strategies change considerably as plants develop, driven by intraindividual variability in anatomical, morphological, physiological and architectural traits.

    Developmental trait variation arises through the complex interplay among genetically regulated phase change (i.e. ontogeny), increases in plant age and size, and phenotypic plasticity to changing environmental conditions. Although spatial drivers of intraspecific trait variation have received extensive research attention, developmentally driven intraspecific trait variation is largely overlooked, despite widespread occurrence.

    Ontogenetic trait variation is genetically regulated, leads to dramatic changes in plant phenotypes and evolves in response to predictable changes in environmental conditions as plants develop.

    Evidence has accumulated to support a general shift from fast to slow relative growth rates and from shade to sun leaves as plants develop from the highly competitive but shady juvenile niche to the stressful adult niche in the systems studied to date.

    Nonetheless, there are major gaps in our knowledge due to examination of only a few environmental factors selecting for the evolution of ontogenetic trajectories, variability in how ontogeny is assigned, biogeographic sampling biases on trees in temperate biomes, dependencies on a few broadly sampled leaf morphological traits and a lack of longitudinal studies that track ontogeny within individuals. Filling these gaps will enhance our understanding of plant functional ecology and provide a framework for predicting the effects of global change threats that target specific ontogenetic stages.

    Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog.

    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Intraspecific diversity of dominant species in native plant communities can modulate ecosystem function under both optimal and stressful conditions. Yet, few genotype by environment interaction studies quantify differences in the shape of plasticity functions or phenotypic breakpoints across genotypes in natural populations.

    Using three genotypes with a history of drought selection, we performed a greenhouse study on the dominant tallgrass prairie speciesAndropogon gerardii. We investigated phenotypic plasticity and recovery differences among genotypes across a water availability gradient, measuring growth‐related, instantaneous and cumulative phenotypes. To further understand genotype by environment effects, we quantified plasticity functions and breakpoints among genotypes.

    Like other studies, we found strong evidence for phenotypic and plasticity differences among genotypes. However, we also found nonlinear plasticity functions and breakpoints were common across phenotypes, especially relative growth rates, biomass allocation and root architecture. Drought selected genotypes were also more likely to flower during recovery, but all genotypes were resilient to drought across treatments.

    We demonstrate that plasticity functions may help explain intraspecific diversity, patterns of selection and nonlinear community responses to more variable rainfall within an experimental population. In particular, plasticity functions can help disentangle drought/variability tolerance versus acquisitive strategies. A better understanding of intraspecific diversity in this grass species will provide more mechanistic insight into its ability to buffer ecosystem changes and provide resiliency in the tallgrass prairie under future droughts.

    A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Decades of research have illuminated the underlying ingredients that determine the scope of evolutionary responses to climate change. The field of evolutionary biology therefore stands ready to take what it has learned about influences upon the rate of adaptive evolution—such as population demography, generation time, and standing genetic variation—and apply it to assess if and how populations can evolve fast enough to “keep pace” with climate change. Here, our review highlights what the field of evolutionary biology can contribute and what it still needs to learn to provide more mechanistic predictions of the winners and losers of climate change. We begin by developing broad predictions for contemporary evolution to climate change based on theory. We then discuss methods for assessing climate‐driven contemporary evolution, including quantitative genetic studies, experimental evolution, and space‐for‐time substitutions. After providing this mechanism‐focused overview of both the evidence for evolutionary responses to climate change and more specifically, evolving to keep pace with climate change, we next consider the factors that limit actual evolutionary responses. In this context, we consider the dual role of phenotypic plasticity in facilitating but also impeding evolutionary change. Finally, we detail how a deeper consideration of evolutionary constraints can improve forecasts of responses to climate change and therefore also inform conservation and management decisions.

    This article is categorized under:

    Climate, Ecology, and Conservation > Observed Ecological Changes

    Climate, Ecology, and Conservation > Extinction Risk

    Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Evaluating Future Impacts of Climate Change

    more » « less