skip to main content


Title: Research Data Sharing: Practices and Attitudes of Geophysicists
Abstract

Open data policies have been introduced by governments, funders, and publishers over the past decade. Previous research showed a growing recognition by scientists of the benefits of data‐sharing and reuse, but actual practices lag and are not always compliant with new regulations. The goal of this study is to investigate motives, attitudes, and data practices of the community of Earth and planetary geophysicists, a discipline believed to have accepting attitudes toward data sharing and reuse. A better understanding of the attitudes and current data‐sharing practices of this scientific community could enable funders, publishers, data managers, and librarians to design systems and services that help scientists understand and adhere to mandates and to create practices, tools, and services that are scientist‐focused. An online survey was distributed to the members of the American Geophysical Union, producing 1,372 responses from 116 countries. The attitudes of researchers to data sharing and reuse were generally positive, but in practice, scientists had concerns about sharing their own research data. These concerns include the possibility of potential data misuse and the need for assurance of proper citation and acknowledgement. Training and assistance in good data management practices are lacking in many scientific fields and might help to alleviate these doubts.

 
more » « less
PAR ID:
10460422
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Earth and Space Science
Volume:
5
Issue:
12
ISSN:
2333-5084
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 891-902
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Many have argued that datasets resulting from scientific research should be part of the scholarly record as first class research products. Data sharing mandates from funding agencies and scientific journal publishers along with calls from the scientific community to better support transparency and reproducibility of scientific research have increased demand for tools and support for publishing datasets. Hydrology domain‐specific data publication services have been developed alongside more general purpose and even commercial data repositories. Prominent among these are the Hydrologic Information System (HIS) and HydroShare repositories developed by the Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science, Inc. (CUAHSI). More broadly, however, multiple organizations have been involved in the practice of data publication in the hydrology domain, each having different roles that have shaped data publication and reuse. Bibliographic and archival approaches to data publication have been advanced, but both have limitations with respect to hydrologic data. Specific recommendations for improving data publication infrastructure, support, and practices to move beyond existing limitations and enable more effective data publication in support of scientific research in the hydrology domain include: improving support for journal article‐based data access and data citation, considering the workflow for data publication, enhancing support for reproducible science, encouraging publication of curated reference data collections, advancing interoperability standards for sharing data and metadata among repositories, developing partnerships with university libraries offering data services, and developing more specific data management plans. While presented in the context of CUAHSI's data repositories and experience, these recommendations are broadly applicable to other domains.

    This article is categorized under:

    Science of Water > Methods

     
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    The systemic challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic require cross-disciplinary collaboration in a global and timely fashion. Such collaboration needs open research practices and the sharing of research outputs, such as data and code, thereby facilitating research and research reproducibility and timely collaboration beyond borders. The Research Data Alliance COVID-19 Working Group recently published a set of recommendations and guidelines on data sharing and related best practices for COVID-19 research. These guidelines include recommendations for researchers, policymakers, funders, publishers and infrastructure providers from the perspective of different domains (Clinical Medicine, Omics, Epidemiology, Social Sciences, Community Participation, Indigenous Peoples, Research Software, Legal and Ethical Considerations). Several overarching themes have emerged from this document such as the need to balance the creation of data adherent to FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable), with the need for quick data release; the use of trustworthy research data repositories; the use of well-annotated data with meaningful metadata; and practices of documenting methods and software. The resulting document marks an unprecedented cross-disciplinary, cross-sectoral, and cross-jurisdictional effort authored by over 160 experts from around the globe. This letter summarises key points of the Recommendations and Guidelines, highlights the relevant findings, shines a spotlight on the process, and suggests how these developments can be leveraged by the wider scientific community. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    It has become common for researchers to make their data publicly available to meet the data management and accessibility requirements of funding agencies and scientific publishers. However, many researchers face the challenge of determining what data to preserve and share and where to preserve and share those data. This can be especially challenging for those who run dynamical models, which can produce complex, voluminous data outputs, and have not considered what outputs may need to be preserved and shared as part of the project design. This manuscript presents findings from the NSF EarthCube Research Coordination Network project titled “What About Model Data? Best Practices for Preservation and Replicability” (https://modeldatarcn.github.io/). These findings suggest that if the primary goal of sharing data are to communicate knowledge, most simulation-based research projects only need to preserve and share selected model outputs along with the full simulation experiment workflow. One major result of this project has been the development of a rubric, designed to provide guidance for making decisions on what simulation output needs to be preserved and shared in trusted community repositories to achieve the goal of knowledge communication. This rubric, along with use cases for selected projects, provide scientists with guidance on data accessibility requirements in the planning process of research, allowing for more thoughtful development of data management plans and funding requests. Additionally, this rubric can be referred to by publishers for what is expected in terms of data accessibility for publication.

     
    more » « less
  4. Progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence promises to advance research and understanding across a wide range of fields and activities. In tandem, increased awareness of the importance of open data for reproducibility and scientific transparency is making inroads in fields that have not traditionally produced large publicly available datasets. Data sharing requirements from publishers and funders, as well as from other stakeholders, have also created pressure to make datasets with research and/or public interest value available through digital repositories. However, to make the best use of existing data, and facilitate the creation of useful future datasets, robust, interoperable and usable standards need to evolve and adapt over time. The open-source development model provides significant potential benefits to the process of standard creation and adaptation. In particular, data and meta-data standards can use long-standing technical and socio-technical processes that have been key to managing the development of software, and which allow incorporating broad community input into the formulation of these standards. On the other hand, open-source models carry unique risks that need to be considered. This report surveys existing open-source standards development, addressing these benefits and risks. It outlines recommendations for standards developers, funders and other stakeholders on the path to robust, interoperable and usable open-source data and metadata standards. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Research on public attitudes toward science and technology policy has relied on surveys taken at single points in time. These surveys fail to indicate how these attitudes develop or change. In this study, we use data from the Longitudinal Study of American Life that has followed a national sample of Generation X for 33 years—from middle school to midlife. We demonstrate that the critical period for the formation of attitudes toward science and technology is the 15–18 years after high school—college, work, family, and career. The attitudes formed in this period remain stable for most individuals during midlife. This work provides an important perspective for scientists, engineers, and the leadership of the scientific community in their efforts to foster positive attitudes toward science and technology and to understand the roots of concerns and reservations about science.

     
    more » « less