More Like this

1. Spaces and practices within university makerspaces

   Madison_Andrews ; Audrey_Boklage ( October 2023 , IEEE)
2. Undergraduate Data Science and Diversity at Purdue University

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3332186.3332202  

   Hillery, Elizabett ; Ward, Mark Daniel ; Rickus, Jenna ; Younts, Alex ; Smith, Preston ; Adams, Eric ( July 2019 , Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (learning) (PEARC ’19)
3. Centering and marginalization in introductory university physics courses

   https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Scherr  

   Scherr, Rachel E. ; Hairston, W. Tali ; McKagan, Sarah B. ( September 2020 , Physics Education Research Conference)

   Steven Wolf, Michael B. (Ed.)
4. Centering and marginalization in introductory university physics classrooms

   https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.964699  

   Scherr, Rachel E ; Hairston, W Tali ; McKagan, Sarah B ; Miller, Sophie ( October 2023 , Frontiers in Education)

   Research-based instructional strategies in physics promote active participation in collaborative activities as a primary means for students to construct understanding. Discussions of physics content are also negotiations of social relations.

   Video analysis of small-group collaborative learning activities in introductory physics classrooms at three different universities, using situated learning theory analyses that include a critical consciousness lens.

   Students’ ability to actively participate in sensemaking may be limited by their peripheral or marginalized position. Some people seem to be centered (or marginalized) for reasons other than the strength of their physics reasoning, and some people’s contributions are elevated (or neglected) for reasons other than their scientific merit.

   Some of the behavioral patterns that we observe typify racialized and gendered interactions that are common in broader U.S. society.

    

   more » « less
5. The principles of tomorrow's university

   https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17425.1  

   Katz, Daniel S. ; Allen, Gabrielle ; Barba, Lorena A. ; Berg, Devin R. ; Bik, Holly ; Boettiger, Carl ; Borgman, Christine L. ; Brown, C. Titus ; Buck, Stuart ; Burd, Randy ; et al ( January 2018 , F1000Research)

   In the 21st Century, research is increasingly data- and computation-driven. Researchers, funders, and the larger community today emphasize the traits of openness and reproducibility. In March 2017, 13 mostly early-career research leaders who are building their careers around these traits came together with ten university leaders (presidents, vice presidents, and vice provosts), representatives from four funding agencies, and eleven organizers and other stakeholders in an NIH- and NSF-funded one-day, invitation-only workshop titled "Imagining Tomorrow's University." Workshop attendees were charged with launching a new dialog around open research – the current status, opportunities for advancement, and challenges that limit sharing. The workshop examined how the internet-enabled research world has changed, and how universities need to change to adapt commensurately, aiming to understand how universities can and should make themselves competitive and attract the best students, staff, and faculty in this new world. During the workshop, the participants re-imagined scholarship, education, and institutions for an open, networked era, to uncover new opportunities for universities to create value and serve society. They expressed the results of these deliberations as a set of 22 principles of tomorrow's university across six areas: credit and attribution, communities, outreach and engagement, education, preservation and reproducibility, and technologies. Activities that follow on from workshop results take one of three forms. First, since the workshop, a number of workshop authors have further developed and published their white papers to make their reflections and recommendations more concrete. These authors are also conducting efforts to implement these ideas, and to make changes in the university system.  Second, we plan to organise a follow-up workshop that focuses on how these principles could be implemented. Third, we believe that the outcomes of this workshop support and are connected with recent theoretical work on the position and future of open knowledge institutions. 

   more » « less