skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Breakdown of clonal cooperative architecture in multispecies biofilms and the spatial ecology of predation
Biofilm formation, including adherence to surfaces and secretion of extracellular matrix, is common in the microbial world, but we often do not know how interaction at the cellular spatial scale translates to higher-order biofilm community ecology. Here we explore an especially understudied element of biofilm ecology, namely predation by the bacteriumBdellovibrio bacteriovorus. This predator can kill and consume many different Gram-negative bacteria, includingVibrio choleraeandEscherichia coli.V. choleraecan protect itself from predation within densely packed biofilm structures that it creates, whereasE. colibiofilms are highly susceptible toB. bacteriovorus. We explore how predator–prey dynamics change whenV. choleraeandE. coliare growing in biofilms together. We find that in dual-species prey biofilms,E. colisurvival underB. bacteriovoruspredation increases, whereasV. choleraesurvival decreases.E. colibenefits from predator protection when it becomes embedded within expanding groups of highly packedV. cholerae. But we also find that the ordered, highly packed, and clonal biofilm structure ofV. choleraecan be disrupted ifV. choleraecells are directly adjacent toE. colicells at the start of biofilm growth. When this occurs, the two species become intermixed, and the resulting disordered cell groups do not block predator entry. Because biofilm cell group structure depends on initial cell distributions at the start of prey biofilm growth, the surface colonization dynamics have a dramatic impact on the eventual multispecies biofilm architecture, which in turn determines to what extent both species survive exposure toB. bacteriovorus.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2017879
PAR ID:
10467895
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Volume:
120
Issue:
6
ISSN:
0027-8424
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, PLOS Biology)
    Barr, Jeremy J. (Ed.)
    Numerous ecological interactions among microbes—for example, competition for space and resources, or interaction among phages and their bacterial hosts—are likely to occur simultaneously in multispecies biofilm communities. While biofilms formed by just a single species occur, multispecies biofilms are thought to be more typical of microbial communities in the natural environment. Previous work has shown that multispecies biofilms can increase, decrease, or have no measurable impact on phage exposure of a host bacterium living alongside another species that the phages cannot target. The reasons underlying this variability are not well understood, and how phage–host encounters change within multispecies biofilms remains mostly unexplored at the cellular spatial scale. Here, we study how the cellular scale architecture of model 2-species biofilms impacts cell–cell and cell–phage interactions controlling larger scale population and community dynamics. Our system consists of dual culture biofilms ofEscherichia coliandVibrio choleraeunder exposure to T7 phages, which we study using microfluidic culture, high-resolution confocal microscopy imaging, and detailed image analysis. As shown previously, sufficiently mature biofilms ofE.colican protect themselves from phage exposure via their curli matrix. Before this stage of biofilm structural maturity,E.coliis highly susceptible to phages; however, we show that these bacteria can gain lasting protection against phage exposure if they have become embedded in the bottom layers of highly packed groups ofV.choleraein co-culture. This protection, in turn, is dependent on the cell packing architecture controlled byV.choleraebiofilm matrix secretion. In this manner,E.colicells that are otherwise susceptible to phage-mediated killing can survive phage exposure in the absence of de novo resistance evolution. While co-culture biofilm formation withV.choleraecan confer phage protection toE.coli, it comes at the cost of competing withV.choleraeand a disruption of normal curli-mediated protection forE.colieven in dual species biofilms grown over long time scales. This work highlights the critical importance of studying multispecies biofilm architecture and its influence on the community dynamics of bacteria and phages. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
    Collective behavior in spatially structured groups, or biofilms, is the norm among microbes in their natural environments. Though biofilm formation has been studied for decades, tracing the mechanistic and ecological links between individual cell morphologies and the emergent features of cell groups is still in its infancy. Here we use single-cell–resolution confocal microscopy to explore biofilms of the human pathogen Vibrio cholerae in conditions mimicking its marine habitat. Prior reports have noted the occurrence of cellular filamentation in V. cholerae , with variable propensity to filament among both toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains. Using a filamenting strain of V. cholerae O139, we show that cells with this morphotype gain a profound competitive advantage in colonizing and spreading on particles of chitin, the material many marine Vibrio species depend on for growth in seawater. Furthermore, filamentous cells can produce biofilms that are independent of primary secreted components of the V. cholerae biofilm matrix; instead, filamentous biofilm architectural strength appears to derive at least in part from the entangled mesh of cells themselves. The advantage gained by filamentous cells in early chitin colonization and growth is countered in long-term competition experiments with matrix-secreting V. cholerae variants, whose densely packed biofilm structures displace competitors from surfaces. Overall, our results reveal an alternative mode of biofilm architecture that is dependent on filamentous cell morphology and advantageous in environments with rapid chitin particle turnover. This insight provides an environmentally relevant example of how cell morphology can impact bacterial fitness. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, PLOS Biology)
    Brown, Sam Paul (Ed.)
    Bacteria commonly exist in multicellular, surface-attached communities called biofilms. Biofilms are central to ecology, medicine, and industry. TheVibrio choleraepathogen forms biofilms from single founder cells that, via cell division, mature into three-dimensional structures with distinct, yet reproducible, regional architectures. To define mechanisms underlying biofilm developmental transitions, we establish a single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) approach that enables accurate quantitation of spatiotemporal gene-expression patterns in biofilms at cell-scale resolution. smFISH analyses ofV. choleraebiofilm regulatory and structural genes demonstrate that, as biofilms mature, overall matrix gene expression decreases, and simultaneously, a pattern emerges in which matrix gene expression becomes largely confined to peripheral biofilm cells. Both quorum sensing and c-di-GMP-signaling are required to generate the proper temporal pattern of matrix gene expression. Quorum sensing signaling is uniform across the biofilm, and thus, c-di-GMP-signaling alone sets the regional matrix gene expression pattern. The smFISH strategy provides insight into mechanisms conferring particular fates to individual biofilm cells. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Nature Communications)
    Abstract Biofilms are ubiquitous surface-associated bacterial communities embedded in an extracellular matrix. It is commonly assumed that biofilm cells are glued together by the matrix; however, how the specific biochemistry of matrix components affects the cell-matrix interactions and how these interactions vary during biofilm growth remain unclear. Here, we investigate cell-matrix interactions inVibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera. We combine genetics, microscopy, simulations, and biochemical analyses to show thatV. choleraecells are not attracted to the main matrix component (Vibriopolysaccharide, VPS), but can be attached to each other and to the VPS network through surface-associated VPS and crosslinks formed by the protein Bap1. Downregulation of VPS production and surface trimming by the polysaccharide lyase RbmB cause surface remodeling as biofilms age, shifting the nature of cell-matrix interactions from attractive to repulsive and facilitating cell dispersal as aggregated groups. Our results shed light on the dynamics of diverse cell-matrix interactions as drivers of biofilm development. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, mBio)
    Whiteley, Marvin (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Bacteria form multicellular aggregates called biofilms. A crucial component of these aggregates is a protective matrix that holds the community together. Biofilm matrix composition varies depending upon bacterial species but typically includes exopolysaccharides (EPS), proteins, and extracellular DNA.Pseudomonas aeruginosais a model organism for the study of biofilms, and in non-mucoid biofilms, it uses the structurally distinct EPS Psl and Pel, the EPS-binding protein CdrA, and eDNA as key matrix components. An interesting phenomenon that we and others have observed is that the periphery of a biofilm aggregate can be EPS-rich and contain very few cells. In this study, we investigated two possible models of assembly and dynamics of this EPS-rich peripheral region: (i) newly synthesized EPS is inserted and incorporated into the existing EPS-rich region at the periphery during biofilm aggregate growth or (ii) EPS is continuously turned over and newly synthesized EPS is deposited at the outermost edge of the aggregate. Our results support the latter model. Specifically, we observed that new EPS is continually deposited at the aggregate periphery, which is necessary for continued aggregate growth but not aggregate stability. We made similar observations in another paradigm biofilm-forming species,Vibrio cholerae. This pattern of deposition raises the question of how EPS is retained. Specifically, forP. aeruginosabiofilms, the matrix adhesin CdrA is thought to retain EPS. However, current thinking is that cell-associated CdrA is responsible for this retention, and it is not clear how CdrA might function in the relatively cell-free aggregate periphery. We observed that CdrA is enzymatically degraded during aggregate growth without negatively impacting biofilm stability and that cell-free CdrA can partially maintain aggregation and Psl retention. Overall, this study shows that the matrix ofP. aeruginosabiofilms undergoes both continuous synthesis of matrix material and matrix turnover to accommodate biofilm aggregate growth and that cell-free matrix can at least partially maintain biofilm aggregation and EPS localization. Furthermore, our similar observations forV. choleraebiofilms suggest that our findings may represent basic principles of aggregate assembly in bacteria. IMPORTANCEHere, we show that, to accommodate growing cellular biomass, newly produced Psl is deposited over existing Psl at the periphery of biofilm aggregates. We demonstrated thatV. choleraeemploys a similar mechanism with its biofilm matrix EPS, VPS. In addition, we found that the protease LasB is present in the biofilm matrix, resulting in degradation of CdrA to lower molecular weight cell-free forms. We then show that the released forms of CdrA are retained in the matrix and remain functional. Together, our findings support that theP. aeruginosabiofilm matrix is dynamic during the course of aggregate growth and that other species may employ similar mechanisms to remodel their matrix. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email