In this article, we describe the case of “Keri,” a fifth‐grade teacher who had completed an Elementary Mathematics Specialist (EMS) certification program. Drawn from a larger study investigating the knowledge, beliefs, and practices of EMSs, Keri's case was unique in that she was teaching mathematics to four classes in a departmentalized structure, where students were placed into different classes according to perceived mathematics ability. Observations from the larger study revealed that Keri's instructional practices did not align with her reported beliefs and knowledge. To explore this deviation, we conducted a case study where we observed Keri's instruction across multiple classes and used interviews to explore reasons for Keri's instructional decisions in terms of her perceived professional obligations. We found that Keri did employ practices that were aligned with her reported beliefs and knowledge such as pressing students for mathematical justifications, but only in her “higher ability” classes. Interview data suggested that Keri's decisions were driven by a strong obligation to individual students, overriding other obligations. We describe implications of these findings, including the limitations of teacher assessments and surveys as proxies for teaching quality, and discuss recommendations for approaches to teacher development that account for teachers’ perceived obligations.
We report on the differences in mathematics learning environments in classes taught by certified Elementary Math Specialists (EMSs) (
 NSFPAR ID:
 10469061
 Publisher / Repository:
 Springer Science + Business Media
 Date Published:
 Journal Name:
 Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
 ISSN:
 13864416
 Format(s):
 Medium: X
 Sponsoring Org:
 National Science Foundation
More Like this

Abstract 
Sacristán, A. I. ; CortésZavala, J. C. ; RuizArias, P. M. (Ed.)Mathematics preservice teachers must learn how to use tools like scientific calculators, Computer Algebra System (CAS), text processors and dynamic mathematical environments. These tools allow users to work with mathematical objects, perform specialized tasks, respond in a defined mathematical way, and transmit mathematical knowledge (Dick & Hollebrands, 2011). To achieve the integration of technology in Mathematics Education, the teacher’s role is very important, since their beliefs and knowledge will dictate how they use technology in the classroom (Julie et al., 2010). The goal of this research is to determine the beliefs and knowledge about technology and its integration into the teaching of mathematics by a group of preservice teachers at the beginning of their first course of methodology in the teaching of mathematics at the secondary level (N=11). Interviews were conducted, and a questionnaire was administered to determine the profile participants use of technology at their schools and universities.more » « less

Sacristán, A.I. ; CortésZavala, J.C. ; RuizArias, P.M. (Ed.)Teachers in the elementary grades often teach all subjects and are expected to have appropriate content knowledge of a wide range of disciplines. Current recommendations suggest teachers should integrate multiple disciplines into the same lesson, for instance, when teaching integrated STEM lessons. Although there are many similarities between STEM fields, there are also epistemological differences to be understood by students and teachers. This study investigated teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics and science using argumentation and the epistemological and contextual factors that may have influenced these beliefs. Teachers’ beliefs about different epistemological underpinnings of mathematics and science, along with contextual constraints, led to different beliefs and intentions for practice with respect to argumentation in these disciplines. The contextual constraint of testing and the amount of curriculum the teachers perceived as essential focused more attention on the teaching of mathematics, which could be seen as benefiting student learning of mathematics. On the other hand, the perception of science as involving wonder, curiosity, and inherently positive and interesting ideas may lead to the creation of a more positive learning environment for the teaching of science. These questions remain open and need to be studied further: What are the consequences of perceiving argumentation in mathematics as limited to concepts already wellunderstood? Can integrating the teaching of mathematics and science lead to more exploratory and inquirybased teaching of mathematical ideas alongside scientific ones?more » « less

Beliefs teachers hold influence the judgments they make about their students, and opportunities they provide for engaging them in rigorous mathematics. While mathrelated beliefs have been widely studied, less is known about teachers’ attributional beliefs (i.e., beliefs about people’s actions or behaviors) for mathematical success. In this study we investigated inservice elementary teachers’ stated beliefs about mathematical success. Findings show that teachers attribute mathematical success to factors that are both internal and external to the student. Although teachers explicitly stated that race and gender were not factors, many used descriptors that served as proxies for students’ demographic markers.more » « less

L. Langran & D. Henriksen (Ed.)Preservice elementary teachers generally have little background in physics or physics education. Five weeks of content using technology (motion sensors and data loggers) was integrated across seven courses taught by three different instructors. Data were gathered from preservice teachers (n = 193) using the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument at a large public Hispanic Serving Institution in the southwest United States. Results showed statistically significant improvements in the Personal Mathematics Teaching Efficacy subscale, but not in the Mathematics Teaching Outcome Expectancy subscale.more » « less