Low or uneven read depth is a common limitation of genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq), resulting in high missing data rates, heterozygotes miscalled as homozygotes, and uncertainty of allele copy number in heterozygous polyploids. Bayesian genotype calling can mitigate these issues, but previously has only been implemented in software that requires a reference genome or uses priors that may be inappropriate for the population. Here we present several novel Bayesian algorithms that estimate genotype posterior probabilities, all of which are implemented in a new R package, polyRAD. Appropriate priors can be specified for mapping populations, populations in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, or structured populations, and in each case can be informed by genotypes at linked markers. The polyRAD software imports read depth from several existing pipelines, and outputs continuous or discrete numerical genotypes suitable for analyses such as genome-wide association and genomic prediction.
more »
« less
Impact of genotype‐calling methodologies on genome‐wide association and genomic prediction in polyploids
Discovery and analysis of genetic variants underlying agriculturally important traits are key to molecular breeding of crops. Reduced representation approaches have provided cost‐efficient genotyping using next‐generation sequencing. However, accurate genotype calling from next‐generation sequencing data is challenging, particularly in polyploid species due to their genome complexity. Recently developed Bayesian statistical methods implemented in available software packages, polyRAD, EBG, and updog, incorporate error rates and population parameters to accurately estimate allelic dosage across any ploidy. We used empirical and simulated data to evaluate the three Bayesian algorithms and demonstrated their impact on the power of genome‐wide association study (GWAS) analysis and the accuracy of genomic prediction. We further incorporated uncertainty in allelic dosage estimation by testing continuous genotype calls and comparing their performance to discrete genotypes in GWAS and genomic prediction. We tested the genotype‐calling methods using data from two autotetraploid species,
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10471941
- Author(s) / Creator(s):
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more »
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Plant Genome
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 1940-3372
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
more » « less
Abstract Background Given the economic and environmental importance of allopolyploids and other species with highly duplicated genomes, there is a need for methods to distinguish paralogs, i.e. duplicate sequences within a genome, from Mendelian loci, i.e. single copy sequences that pair at meiosis. The ratio of observed to expected heterozygosity is an effective tool for filtering loci but requires genotyping to be performed first at a high computational cost, whereas counting the number of sequence tags detected per genotype is computationally quick but very ineffective in inbred or polyploid populations. Therefore, new methods are needed for filtering paralogs.
Results We introduce a novel statistic,
H ind /H E , that uses the probability that two reads sampled from a genotype will belong to different alleles, instead of observed heterozygosity. The expected value ofH ind /H E is the same across all loci in a dataset, regardless of read depth or allele frequency. In contrast to methods based on observed heterozygosity, it can be estimated and used for filtering loci prior to genotype calling. In addition to filtering paralogs, it can be used to filter loci with null alleles or high overdispersion, and identify individuals with unexpected ploidy and hybrid status. We demonstrate that the statistic is useful at read depths as low as five to 10, well below the depth needed for accurate genotype calling in polyploid and outcrossing species.Conclusions Our methodology for estimating
H ind /H E across loci and individuals, as well as determining reasonable thresholds for filtering loci, is implemented in polyRAD v1.6, available athttps://github.com/lvclark/polyRAD . In large sequencing datasets, we anticipate that the ability to filter markers and identify problematic individuals prior to genotype calling will save researchers considerable computational time. -
more » « less
Abstract The development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) enabled a shift from array-based genotyping to directly sequencing genomic libraries for high-throughput genotyping. Even though whole-genome sequencing was initially too costly for routine analysis in large populations such as breeding or genetic studies, continued advancements in genome sequencing and bioinformatics have provided the opportunity to capitalize on whole-genome information. As new sequencing platforms can routinely provide high-quality sequencing data for sufficient genome coverage to genotype various breeding populations, a limitation comes in the time and cost of library construction when multiplexing a large number of samples. Here we describe a high-throughput whole-genome skim-sequencing (skim-seq) approach that can be utilized for a broad range of genotyping and genomic characterization. Using optimized low-volume Illumina Nextera chemistry, we developed a skim-seq method and combined up to 960 samples in one multiplex library using dual index barcoding. With the dual-index barcoding, the number of samples for multiplexing can be adjusted depending on the amount of data required, and could be extended to 3,072 samples or more. Panels of doubled haploid wheat lines (
Triticum aestivum , CDC Stanley x CDC Landmark), wheat-barley (T .aestivum xHordeum vulgare ) and wheat-wheatgrass (Triticum durum x Thinopyrum intermedium ) introgression lines as well as known monosomic wheat stocks were genotyped using the skim-seq approach. Bioinformatics pipelines were developed for various applications where sequencing coverage ranged from 1 × down to 0.01 × per sample. Using reference genomes, we detected chromosome dosage, identified aneuploidy, and karyotyped introgression lines from the skim-seq data. Leveraging the recent advancements in genome sequencing, skim-seq provides an effective and low-cost tool for routine genotyping and genetic analysis, which can track and identify introgressions and genomic regions of interest in genetics research and applied breeding programs. -
more » « less
Abstract Non‐random mating among individuals can lead to spatial clustering of genetically similar individuals and population stratification. This deviation from panmixia is commonly observed in natural populations. Consequently, individuals can have parentage in single populations or involving hybridization between differentiated populations. Accounting for this mixture and structure is important when mapping the genetics of traits and learning about the formative evolutionary processes that shape genetic variation among individuals and populations. Stratified genetic relatedness among individuals is commonly quantified using estimates of ancestry that are derived from a statistical model. Development of these models for polyploid and mixed‐ploidy individuals and populations has lagged behind those for diploids. Here, we extend and test a hierarchical Bayesian model, called
entropy , which can use low‐depth sequence data to estimate genotype and ancestry parameters in autopolyploid and mixed‐ploidy individuals (including sex chromosomes and autosomes within individuals). Our analysis of simulated data illustrated the trade‐off between sequencing depth and genome coverage and found lower error associated with low‐depth sequencing across a larger fraction of the genome than with high‐depth sequencing across a smaller fraction of the genome. The model has high accuracy and sensitivity as verified with simulated data and through analysis of admixture among populations of diploid and tetraploidArabidopsis arenosa . -
more » « less
Abstract Low‐coverage whole genome sequencing (lcWGS) has emerged as a powerful and cost‐effective approach for population genomic studies in both model and nonmodel species. However, with read depths too low to confidently call individual genotypes, lcWGS requires specialized analysis tools that explicitly account for genotype uncertainty. A growing number of such tools have become available, but it can be difficult to get an overview of what types of analyses can be performed reliably with lcWGS data, and how the distribution of sequencing effort between the number of samples analysed and per‐sample sequencing depths affects inference accuracy. In this introductory guide to lcWGS, we first illustrate how the per‐sample cost for lcWGS is now comparable to RAD‐seq and Pool‐seq in many systems. We then provide an overview of software packages that explicitly account for genotype uncertainty in different types of population genomic inference. Next, we use both simulated and empirical data to assess the accuracy of allele frequency, genetic diversity, and linkage disequilibrium estimation, detection of population structure, and selection scans under different sequencing strategies. Our results show that spreading a given amount of sequencing effort across more samples with lower depth per sample consistently improves the accuracy of most types of inference, with a few notable exceptions. Finally, we assess the potential for using imputation to bolster inference from lcWGS data in nonmodel species, and discuss current limitations and future perspectives for lcWGS‐based population genomics research. With this overview, we hope to make lcWGS more approachable and stimulate its broader adoption.
