skip to main content


Title: Single-Source-Single-Target Interleaved-Dyck Reachability via Integer Linear Programming

An interleaved-Dyck (InterDyck) language consists of the interleaving of two or more Dyck languages, where each Dyck language represents a set of strings of balanced parentheses.InterDyck-reachability is a fundamental framework for program analyzers that simultaneously track multiple properly-matched pairs of actions such as call/return, lock/unlock, or write-data/read-data.Existing InterDyck-reachability algorithms are based on the well-known tabulation technique.

This paper presents a new perspective on solving InterDyck-reachability. Our key observation is that for the single-source-single-target InterDyck-reachability variant, it is feasible to summarize all paths from the source node to the target node based onpath expressions. Therefore, InterDyck-reachability becomes an InterDyck-path-recognition problem over path expressions. Instead of computing summary edges as in traditional tabulation algorithms, this new perspective enables us to express InterDyck-reachability as aparenthesis-countingproblem, which can be naturally formulated via integer linear programming (ILP).

We implemented our ILP-based algorithm and performed extensive evaluations based on two client analyses (a reachability analysis for concurrent programs and a taint analysis). In particular, we evaluated our algorithm against two types of algorithms: (1) the general all-pairs InterDyck-reachability algorithms based on linear conjunctive language (LCL) reachability and synchronized pushdown system (SPDS) reachability, and (2) two domain-specific algorithms for both client analyses. The experimental results are encouraging. Our algorithm achieves 1.42×, 28.24×, and 11.76× speedup for the concurrency-analysis benchmarks compared to all-pair LCL-reachability, SPDS-reachability, and domain-specific tools, respectively; 1.2×, 69.9×, and 0.98× speedup for the taint-analysis benchmarks. Moreover, the algorithm also provides precision improvements, particularly for taint analysis, where it achieves 4.55%, 11.1%, and 6.8% improvement, respectively.

 
more » « less
Award ID(s):
1917924
NSF-PAR ID:
10472621
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
ACM
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
Volume:
7
Issue:
POPL
ISSN:
2475-1421
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1003 to 1026
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Dyck-reachability is a fundamental formulation for program analysis, which has been widely used to capture properly-matched-parenthesis program properties such as function calls/returns and field writes/reads. Bidirected Dyck-reachability is a relaxation of Dyck-reachability on bidirected graphs where each edge u → ( i v labeled by an open parenthesis “( i ” is accompanied with an inverse edge v → ) i u labeled by the corresponding close parenthesis “) i ”, and vice versa. In practice, many client analyses such as alias analysis adopt the bidirected Dyck-reachability formulation. Bidirected Dyck-reachability admits an optimal reachability algorithm. Specifically, given a graph with n nodes and m edges, the optimal bidirected Dyck-reachability algorithm computes all-pairs reachability information in O ( m ) time. This paper focuses on the dynamic version of bidirected Dyck-reachability. In particular, we consider the problem of maintaining all-pairs Dyck-reachability information in bidirected graphs under a sequence of edge insertions and deletions. Dynamic bidirected Dyck-reachability can formulate many program analysis problems in the presence of code changes. Unfortunately, solving dynamic graph reachability problems is challenging. For example, even for maintaining transitive closure, the fastest deterministic dynamic algorithm requires O ( n 2 ) update time to achieve O (1) query time. All-pairs Dyck-reachability is a generalization of transitive closure. Despite extensive research on incremental computation, there is no algorithmic development on dynamic graph algorithms for program analysis with worst-case guarantees. Our work fills the gap and proposes the first dynamic algorithm for Dyck reachability on bidirected graphs. Our dynamic algorithms can handle each graph update ( i.e. , edge insertion and deletion) in O ( n ·α( n )) time and support any all-pairs reachability query in O (1) time, where α( n ) is the inverse Ackermann function. We have implemented and evaluated our dynamic algorithm on an alias analysis and a context-sensitive data-dependence analysis for Java. We compare our dynamic algorithms against a straightforward approach based on the O ( m )-time optimal bidirected Dyck-reachability algorithm and a recent incremental Datalog solver. Experimental results show that our algorithm achieves orders of magnitude speedup over both approaches. 
    more » « less
  2. Many program-analysis problems can be formulated as graph-reachability problems. Interleaved Dyck language reachability ( InterDyck -reachability) is a fundamental framework to express a wide variety of program-analysis problems over edge-labeled graphs. The InterDyck language represents an intersection of multiple matched-parenthesis languages (i.e., Dyck languages). In practice, program analyses typically leverage one Dyck language to achieve context-sensitivity, and other Dyck languages to model data dependencies, such as field-sensitivity and pointer references/dereferences. In the ideal case, an InterDyck -reachability framework should model multiple Dyck languages simultaneously . Unfortunately, precise InterDyck -reachability is undecidable. Any practical solution must over-approximate the exact answer. In the literature, a lot of work has been proposed to over-approximate the InterDyck -reachability formulation. This article offers a new perspective on improving both the precision and the scalability of InterDyck -reachability: we aim at simplifying the underlying input graph G . Our key insight is based on the observation that if an edge is not contributing to any InterDyck -paths, we can safely eliminate it from G . Our technique is orthogonal to the InterDyck -reachability formulation and can serve as a pre-processing step with any over-approximating approach for InterDyck -reachability. We have applied our graph simplification algorithm to pre-processing the graphs from a recent InterDyck -reachability-based taint analysis for Android. Our evaluation of three popular InterDyck -reachability algorithms yields promising results. In particular, our graph-simplification method improves both the scalability and precision of all three InterDyck -reachability algorithms, sometimes dramatically. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Many program analyses need to reason about pairs of matching actions, such as call/return, lock/unlock, or set-field/get-field. The family of Dyck languages { D k }, where D k has k kinds of parenthesis pairs, can be used to model matching actions as balanced parentheses. Consequently, many program-analysis problems can be formulated as Dyck-reachability problems on edge-labeled digraphs. Interleaved Dyck-reachability (InterDyck-reachability), denoted by D k ⊙ D k -reachability, is a natural extension of Dyck-reachability that allows one to formulate program-analysis problems that involve multiple kinds of matching-action pairs. Unfortunately, the general InterDyck-reachability problem is undecidable. In this paper, we study variants of InterDyck-reachability on bidirected graphs , where for each edge ⟨ p , q ⟩ labeled by an open parenthesis ”( a ”, there is an edge ⟨ q , p ⟩ labeled by the corresponding close parenthesis ”) a ”, and vice versa . Language-reachability on a bidirected graph has proven to be useful both (1) in its own right, as a way to formalize many program-analysis problems, such as pointer analysis, and (2) as a relaxation method that uses a fast algorithm to over-approximate language-reachability on a directed graph. However, unlike its directed counterpart, the complexity of bidirected InterDyck-reachability still remains open. We establish the first decidable variant (i.e., D 1 ⊙ D 1 -reachability) of bidirected InterDyck-reachability. In D 1 ⊙ D 1 -reachability, each of the two Dyck languages is restricted to have only a single kind of parenthesis pair. In particular, we show that the bidirected D 1 ⊙ D 1 problem is in PTIME. We also show that when one extends each Dyck language to involve k different kinds of parentheses (i.e., D k ⊙ D k -reachability with k ≥ 2), the problem is NP-hard (and therefore much harder). We have implemented the polynomial-time algorithm for bidirected D 1 ⊙ D 1 -reachability. D k ⊙ D k -reachability provides a new over-approximation method for bidirected D k ⊙ D k -reachability in the sense that D k ⊙ D k -reachability can first be relaxed to bidirected D 1 ⊙ D 1 -reachability, and then the resulting bidirected D 1 ⊙ D 1 -reachability problem is solved precisely. We compare this D 1 ⊙ D 1 -reachability-based approach against another known over-approximating D k ⊙ D k -reachability algorithm. Surprisingly, we found that the over-approximation approach based on bidirected D 1 ⊙ D 1 -reachability computes more precise solutions, even though the D 1 ⊙ D 1 formalism is inherently less expressive than the D k ⊙ D k formalism. 
    more » « less
  4. Context-free language reachability (CFL-reachability) is a fundamental framework for program analysis. A large variety of static analyses can be formulated as CFL-reachability problems, which determines whether specific source-sink pairs in an edge-labeled graph are connected by a reachable path, i.e., a path whose edge labels form a string accepted by the given CFL. Computing CFL-reachability is expensive. The fastest algorithm exhibits a slightly subcubic time complexity with respect to the input graph size. Improving the scalability of CFL-reachability is of practical interest, but reducing the time complexity is inherently difficult. In this paper, we focus on improving the scalability of CFL-reachability from a more practical perspective---reducing the input graph size. Our idea arises from the existence of trivial edges, i.e., edges that do not affect any reachable path in CFL-reachability. We observe that two nodes joined by trivial edges can be folded---by merging the two nodes with all the edges joining them removed---without affecting the CFL-reachability result. By studying the characteristic of the recursive state machines (RSMs), an alternative form of CFLs, we propose an approach to identify foldable node pairs without the need to verify the underlying reachable paths (which is equivalent to solving the CFL-reachability problem). In particular, given a CFL-reachability problem instance with an input graph G and an RSM, based on the correspondence between paths in G and state transitions in RSM, we propose a graph folding principle, which can determine whether two adjacent nodes are foldable by examining only their incoming and outgoing edges. On top of the graph folding principle, we propose an efficient graph folding algorithm GF. The time complexity of GF is linear with respect to the number of nodes in the input graph. Our evaluations on two clients (alias analysis and value-flow analysis) show that GF significantly accelerates RSM/CFL-reachability by reducing the input graph size. On average, for value-flow analysis, GF reduces 60.96% of nodes and 42.67% of edges of the input graphs, obtaining a speedup of 4.65× and a memory usage reduction of 57.35%. For alias analysis, GF reduces 38.93% of nodes and 35.61% of edges of the input graphs, obtaining a speedup of 3.21× and a memory usage reduction of 65.19%. 
    more » « less
  5. Counting the frequency of subgraphs in large networks is a classic research question that reveals the underlying substructures of these networks for important applications. However, subgraph counting is a challenging problem, even for subgraph sizes as small as five, due to the combinatorial explosion in the number of possible occurrences. This article focuses on the five-cycle, which is an important special case of five-vertex subgraph counting and one of the most difficult to count efficiently. We design two new parallel five-cycle counting algorithms and prove that they are work efficient and achieve polylogarithmic span. Both algorithms are based on computing low out-degree orientations, which enables the efficient computation of directed two-paths and three-paths, and the algorithms differ in the ways in which they use this orientation to eliminate double-counting. Additionally, we present new parallel algorithms for obtaining unbiased estimates of five-cycle counts using graph sparsification. We develop fast multicore implementations of the algorithms and propose a work scheduling optimization to improve their performance. Our experiments on a variety of real-world graphs using a 36-core machine with two-way hyper-threading show that our best exact parallel algorithm achieves 10–46× self-relative speedup, outperforms our serial benchmarks by 10–32×, and outperforms the previous state-of-the-art serial algorithm by up to 818×. Our best approximate algorithm, for a reasonable probability parameter, achieves up to 20× self-relative speedup and is able to approximate five-cycle counts 9–189× faster than our best exact algorithm, with between 0.52% and 11.77% error. 
    more » « less