More Like this

1. The impact of competition between cancer cells and healthy cells on optimal drug delivery

   https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2019043  

   Cho, Heyrim ; Levy, Doron ( January 2020 , Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena)

   Hubert, Florence (Ed.)

   Cell competition is recognized to be instrumental to the dynamics and structure of the tumor-host interface in invasive cancers. In mild competition scenarios, the healthy tissue and cancer cells can coexist. When the competition is aggressive, competitive cells, the so called super-competitors, expand by killing other cells. Novel chemotherapy drugs and molecularly targeted drugs are commonly administered as part of cancer therapy. Both types of drugs are susceptible to various mechanisms of drug resistance, obstructing or preventing a successful outcome. In this paper, we develop a cancer growth model that accounts for the competition between cancer cells and healthy cells. The model incorporates resistance to both chemotherapy and targeted drugs. In both cases, the level of drug resistance is assumed to be a continuous variable ranging from fully-sensitive to fully-resistant. Using our model we demonstrate that when the competition is moderate, therapies using both drugs are more effective compared with single drug therapies. However, when cancer cells are highly competitive, targeted drugs become more effective. The results of the study stress the importance of adjusting the therapy to the pre-treatment resistance levels. We conclude with a study of the spatiotemporal propagation of drug resistance in a competitive setting, verifying that the same conclusions hold in the spatially heterogeneous case. 

   more » « less
2. Cell cycle plasticity underlies fractional resistance to palbociclib in ER+/HER2− breast tumor cells

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2309261121  

   Zikry, Tarek M. ; Wolff, Samuel C. ; Ranek, Jolene S. ; Davis, Harris M. ; Naugle, Ander ; Luthra, Namit ; Whitman, Austin A. ; Kedziora, Katarzyna M. ; Stallaert, Wayne ; Kosorok, Michael R. ; et al ( February 2024 , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

   The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib blocks cell cycle progression in Estrogen receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor–negative (ER+/HER2−) breast tumor cells. Despite the drug’s success in improving patient outcomes, a small percentage of tumor cells continues to divide in the presence of palbociclib—a phenomenon we refer to as fractional resistance. It is critical to understand the cellular mechanisms underlying fractional resistance because the precise percentage of resistant cells in patient tissue is a strong predictor of clinical outcomes. Here, we hypothesize that fractional resistance arises from cell-to-cell differences in core cell cycle regulators that allow a subset of cells to escape CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. We used multiplex, single-cell imaging to identify fractionally resistant cells in both cultured and primary breast tumor samples resected from patients. Resistant cells showed premature accumulation of multiple G1 regulators including E2F1, retinoblastoma protein, and CDK2, as well as enhanced sensitivity to pharmacological inhibition of CDK2 activity. Using trajectory inference approaches, we show how plasticity among cell cycle regulators gives rise to alternate cell cycle “paths” that allow individual tumor cells to escape palbociclib treatment. Understanding drivers of cell cycle plasticity, and how to eliminate resistant cell cycle paths, could lead to improved cancer therapies targeting fractionally resistant cells to improve patient outcomes.

    

   more » « less
3. A SNAI2-PEAK1-INHBA stromal axis drives progression and lapatinib resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer by supporting subpopulations of tumor cells positive for antiapoptotic and stress signaling markers

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-01906-2  

   Hamalian, Sarkis ; Güth, Robert ; Runa, Farhana ; Sanchez, Francesca ; Vickers, Eric ; Agajanian, Megan ; Molnar, Justin ; Nguyen, Tuan ; Gamez, Joshua ; Humphries, Jonathan D. ; et al ( July 2021 , Oncogene)

   Intercellular mechanisms by which the stromal microenvironment contributes to solid tumor progression and targeted therapy resistance remain poorly understood, presenting significant clinical hurdles. PEAK1 (Pseudopodium-Enriched Atypical Kinase One) is an actin cytoskeleton- and focal adhesion-associated pseudokinase that promotes cell state plasticity and cancer metastasis by mediating growth factor-integrin signaling crosstalk. Here, we determined that stromal PEAK1 expression predicts poor outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancers high in SNAI2 expression and enriched for MSC content. Specifically, we identified that the fibroblastic stroma in HER2-positive breast cancer patient tissue stains positive for both nuclear SNAI2 and cytoplasmic PEAK1. Furthermore, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) express high PEAK1 protein levels and potentiate tumorigenesis, lapatinib resistance and metastasis of HER2-positive breast cancer cells in a PEAK1-dependent manner. Analysis of PEAK1-dependent secreted factors from MSCs revealed INHBA/activin-A as a necessary factor in the conditioned media of PEAK1-expressing MSCs that promotes lapatinib resistance. Single-cell CycIF analysis of MSC-breast cancer cell co-cultures identified enrichment of p-Akt^high/p-gH2AX^low, MCL1^high/p-gH2AX^lowand GRP78^high/VIM^highbreast cancer cell subpopulations by the presence of PEAK1-expressing MSCs and lapatinib treatment. Bioinformatic analyses on a PEAK1-centric stroma-tumor cell gene set and follow-up immunostaining of co-cultures predict targeting antiapoptotic and stress pathways as a means to improve targeted therapy responses and patient outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer and other stroma-rich malignancies. These data provide the first evidence that PEAK1 promotes tumorigenic phenotypes through a previously unrecognized SNAI2-PEAK1-INHBA stromal cell axis.

    

   more » « less
4. Cellograph: a semi-supervised approach to analyzing multi-condition single-cell RNA-sequencing data using graph neural networks

   https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05641-9  

   Shahir, Jamshaid A. ; Stanley, Natalie ; Purvis, Jeremy E. ( December 2024 , BMC bioinformatics)

   With the growing number of single-cell datasets collected under more complex experimental conditions, there is an opportunity to leverage single-cell variability to reveal deeper insights into how cells respond to perturbations. Many existing approaches rely on discretizing the data into clusters for differential gene expression (DGE), effectively ironing out any information unveiled by the single-cell variability across cell-types. In addition, DGE often assumes a statistical distribution that, if erroneous, can lead to false positive differentially expressed genes. Here, we present Cellograph: a semi-supervised framework that uses graph neural networks to quantify the effects of perturbations at single-cell granularity. Cellograph not only measures how prototypical cells are of each condition but also learns a latent space that is amenable to interpretable data visualization and clustering. The learned gene weight matrix from training reveals pertinent genes driving the differences between conditions. We demonstrate the utility of our approach on publicly-available datasets including cancer drug therapy, stem cell reprogramming, and organoid differentiation. Cellograph outperforms existing methods for quantifying the effects of experimental perturbations and offers a novel framework to analyze single-cell data using deep learning.

    

   more » « less
5. Targeting the Interplay between Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal-Transition and the Immune System for Effective Immunotherapy

   https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050714  

   Soundararajan, Rama ; Fradette, Jared ; Konen, Jessica ; Moulder, Stacy ; Zhang, Xiang ; Gibbons, Don ; Varadarajan, Navin ; Wistuba, Ignacio ; Tripathy, Debasish ; Bernatchez, Chantale ; et al ( May 2019 , Cancers)

   Over the last decade, both early diagnosis and targeted therapy have improved the survival rates of many cancer patients. Most recently, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment options for cancers such as melanoma. Unfortunately, a significant portion of cancers (including lung and breast cancers) do not respond to immunotherapy, and many of them develop resistance to chemotherapy. Molecular characterization of non-responsive cancers suggest that an embryonic program known as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is mostly latent in adults, can be activated under selective pressures, rendering these cancers resistant to chemo- and immunotherapies. EMT can also drive tumor metastases, which in turn also suppress the cancer-fighting activity of cytotoxic T cells that traffic into the tumor, causing immunotherapy to fail. In this review, we compare and contrast immunotherapy treatment options of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We discuss why, despite breakthrough progress in immunotherapy, attaining predictable outcomes in the clinic is mostly an unsolved problem for these tumors. Although these two cancer types appear different based upon their tissues of origin and molecular classification, gene expression indicate that they possess many similarities. Patient tumors exhibit activation of EMT, and resulting stem cell properties in both these cancer types associate with metastasis and resistance to existing cancer therapies. In addition, the EMT transition in both these cancers plays a crucial role in immunosuppression, which exacerbates treatment resistance. To improve cancer-related survival we need to understand and circumvent, the mechanisms through which these tumors become therapy resistant. In this review, we discuss new information and complementary perspectives to inform combination treatment strategies to expand and improve the anti-tumor responses of currently available clinical immune checkpoint inhibitors. 

   more » « less