More Like this

1. The landscape of cell–cell communication through single-cell transcriptomics

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2021.03.007  

   Almet, Axel A.; Cang, Zixuan; Jin, Suoqin; Nie, Qing (June 2021, Current Opinion in Systems Biology)
2. Cell alignment modulated by surface nano-topography – Roles of cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.057  

   Coyle, Stephen; Doss, Bryant; Huo, Yucheng; Singh, Hemang Raj; Quinn, David; Jimmy Hsia, K.; LeDuc, Philip R. (April 2022, Acta Biomaterialia)
3. Learning the dynamics of cell–cell interactions in confined cell migration

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016602118  

   Brückner, David B.; Arlt, Nicolas; Fink, Alexandra; Ronceray, Pierre; Rädler, Joachim O.; Broedersz, Chase P. (February 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

   null (Ed.)

   The migratory dynamics of cells in physiological processes, ranging from wound healing to cancer metastasis, rely on contact-mediated cell–cell interactions. These interactions play a key role in shaping the stochastic trajectories of migrating cells. While data-driven physical formalisms for the stochastic migration dynamics of single cells have been developed, such a framework for the behavioral dynamics of interacting cells still remains elusive. Here, we monitor stochastic cell trajectories in a minimal experimental cell collider: a dumbbell-shaped micropattern on which pairs of cells perform repeated cellular collisions. We observe different characteristic behaviors, including cells reversing, following, and sliding past each other upon collision. Capitalizing on this large experimental dataset of coupled cell trajectories, we infer an interacting stochastic equation of motion that accurately predicts the observed interaction behaviors. Our approach reveals that interacting noncancerous MCF10A cells can be described by repulsion and friction interactions. In contrast, cancerous MDA-MB-231 cells exhibit attraction and antifriction interactions, promoting the predominant relative sliding behavior observed for these cells. Based on these experimentally inferred interactions, we show how this framework may generalize to provide a unifying theoretical description of the diverse cellular interaction behaviors of distinct cell types. 

   more » « less
4. CellChat for systematic analysis of cell–cell communication from single-cell transcriptomics

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01045-4  

   Jin, Suoqin; Plikus, Maksim V; Nie, Qing (September 2024, Nature Protocols)
5. Analyzing network diversity of cell–cell interactions in COVID-19 using single-cell transcriptomics

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.948508  

   Wang, Xinyi; Almet, Axel A.; Nie, Qing (August 2022, Frontiers in Genetics)

   Cell–cell interactions (CCI) play significant roles in manipulating biological functions of cells. Analyzing the differences in CCI between healthy and diseased conditions of a biological system yields greater insight than analyzing either conditions alone. There has been a recent and rapid growth of methods to infer CCI from single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), revealing complex CCI networks at a previously inaccessible scale. However, the majority of current CCI analyses from scRNA-seq data focus on direct comparisons between individual CCI networks of individual samples from patients, rather than “group-level” comparisons between sample groups of patients comprising different conditions. To illustrate new biological features among different disease statuses, we investigated the diversity of key network features on groups of CCI networks, as defined by different disease statuses. We considered three levels of network features: node level, as defined by cell type; node-to-node level; and network level. By applying these analysis to a large-scale single-cell RNA-sequencing dataset of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we observe biologically meaningful patterns aligned with the progression and subsequent convalescence of COVID-19. 

   more » « less