- Award ID(s):
- 1921523
- PAR ID:
- 10477485
- Editor(s):
- Taylor, Mark P.
- Publisher / Repository:
- Routledge
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Applied Economics Letters
- Edition / Version:
- 1.0
- Volume:
- 0
- Issue:
- 0
- ISSN:
- 1350-4851
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1-5
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Subjective housing affordability Youden index Optimal cutpoint Malaysia
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: 958.1KB Other: pdf
- Size(s):
- 958.1KB
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Over the last three decades, the growth in housing costs relative to household incomes across cities in the United States has dramatically affected households' housing options. For this study, we apply a logit model to data from the American Housing Survey to provide evidence on how rising house costs affect female-headed households' decisions to move from the current home to another. Estimates reveal that total housing cost is a significant determinant of a female-headed household’s decision to move. We also found that lower-income female-headed households are more likely to move to a new location than higher-income female-headed households. These results support the idea that affordable housing programs should be maintained and expanded to offer some alleviation to the burden of rising housing costs on lower-income female-headed households and other vulnerable groupsmore » « less
-
Abstract Our study proposes a housing location choice model where a household faces a trade‐off between proximity to place of employment and proximity to amenities. We consider subsamples of high amenity cities and low amenity cities and households with and without children. We show that the roles of gender, education, homeownership, household composition, and public transportation vary significantly depending on level of amenities. Households with a female head of household, those with a working spouse and with older children prefer locating closer to downtown amenities. Female workers with and without children locate closer to work, in high and low amenity cities.
-
Abstract In February 2021, severe winter weather conditions associated with Winter Storm Uri triggered an energy infrastructure failure in Texas. Most Texans lost electricity, some lost potable water, natural gas, and suffered other infrastructure-related service disruptions that had profound household consequences. Although several studies have documented the disparities in terms of the types and extent of disruptions Texans experienced during Uri, there is little information about the impact of these disruptions in terms of their burdens on households. Guided by the Capabilities Approach framework, a survey of Texan households was conducted to identify the outage characteristics and capability losses for different household types, as well as the
burdens that those disruptions posed to households using both objective and subjective measures. Our results indicate that households that endured longer and constant electricity outages suffered more severe impacts across all measures, including more disrupted household capabilities, increased time, and financial costs to cope during the outages, as well as greater declines in reported life satisfaction. We found that low-income households, households with children, and households with disability challenges suffered more severe objective burdens during the storm, although subjective results for these households were mixed. Households with members over the age of 65 fared better in terms of objective measures, yet suffered more in terms of subjective well-being. Moreover, households that had prior experience with a prolonged outage reported significantly smaller reductions in well-being during the storm than other households, despite not showing any difference in objective measures. Ultimately, our results offer context-specific, post-event information about the impacts and needs of different types of households during Uri that are important for informing emergency management and community resilience planning. -
Winkler, Inga T. (Ed.)Access to clean and safe water is essential for human health and well-being, but recent and substantial increases in the cost of water for residential customers in the United States endanger the health of those who cannot afford to pay. This study identifies pathways through which unaffordable water bills may influence the behaviors and health of vulnerable people. We interviewed a sample of low-income residential water customers who were experiencing water bill hardship in Boston and Chelsea, Massachusetts, U.S. between October 2018 and December 2019. We conducted a thematic content analysis of interview transcripts. Results showed that some participants improvised ways to pay their water bills, and some confronted obstacles that made it simply impossible to pay at times. Behavioral responses to coping with high water bills were influenced by household earning potential, self-reported health status, caretaking responsibilities, and accessibility of utility assistance programs. Consequences of unaffordable household bills included reduced access to other necessities, debt accumulation, risk of water shutoff, housing insecurity, and public humiliation. Reported health-related impacts of water bill hardship were food insecurity, underutilization of healthcare and medications, and decline in mental health. Comprehensive reforms at all levels of government are needed to make water affordable for all low-income households. Federal investments in water infrastructure, state oversight of affordability and human rights, as well as municipal tiered water pricing and comprehensive assistance policies for low-income households are needed to address the growing water affordability crisis and to mitigate harm to the well-being of vulnerable residents and communities in the United States.more » « less
-
- (Ed.)Buildings are responsible for the largest portion of energy consumption on U.S. electric grids. The wide participation of buildings in demand side management (DSM) through modulating or shifting electricity end uses, particularly in homes, can support decarbonization goals and increase reliability of electric power supply. The awareness and willingness of households to adjust internal loads, housing occupancy, and household energy consumption patterns all play an important role to support the potential for DSM. A particularly challenging type of housing to reach in DSM is rental housing. Historically this type of housing has been plagued by split incentives that limit the motivation of home owners (landlords) to improve the energy performance of these buildings since they often do not pay the utility bills. DSM presents an opportunity to support reducing the utility bills of renters through controls adjustments rather than requiring the landlord to invest in energy efficient technologies. This study aims to identify household occupancy schedules and potential factors that may influence willingness to participate in DSM among renters, in particular college students. A survey-based method was conducted among 55 college students majoring in civil, environmental, and applied engineering and showed that, while the targeted population has low awareness about DSM strategies, they would be willing to participate in a DSM in the future. The factors that appear to drive willingness to participate in DSM for this population were related to the potential reduction of electricity costs and energy savings.more » « less