skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: An analysis of an instructional development workshop to promote the adoption of active learning in STEM: Potential implications for faculty developers
Award ID(s):
1821488
PAR ID:
10482905
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
International Journal of Engineering Education
Date Published:
Journal Name:
International journal of engineering education
ISSN:
0949-149X
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Blocked randomized designs are used to improve the precision of treatment effect estimates compared to a completely randomized design. A block is a set of units that are relatively homogeneous and consequently would tend to produce relatively similar outcomes if the treatment had no effect. The problem of finding the optimal blocking of the units into equal sized blocks of any given size larger than two is known to be a difficult problem—there is no polynomial time method guaranteed to find the optimal blocking. All available methods to solve the problem are heuristic methods. We propose methods that run in polynomial time and guarantee a blocking that is provably close to the optimal blocking. In all our simulation studies, the proposed methods perform better, create better homogeneous blocks, compared with the existing methods. Our blocking method aims to minimize the maximum of all pairwise differences of units in the same block. We show that bounding this maximum difference ensures that the error in the average treatment effect estimate is similarly bounded for all treatment assignments. In contrast, if the blocking bounds the average or sum of these differences, the error in the average treatment effect estimate can still be large in several treatment assignments. 
    more » « less
  2. This work gives an equivariantly enriched count of nodal orbits in a general pencil of plane conics that is invariant under a linear action of a finite group on CP2. This can be thought of as spearheading equivariant enumerative enrichments valued in the Burnside Ring, both inspired by and a departure from R(G)-valued enrichments such as Roberts’ equivariant Milnor number and Damon’s equivariant signature formula. Given a G-invariant general pencil of conics, the weighted sum of nodal orbits in the pencil is a formula in terms of the base locus considered as a G-set. We show this is true for all finite groups except Z/2 × Z/2 and D8 and give counterexamples for the two exceptional groups. 
    more » « less