An official website of the United States government
The field of (U-Th)/He geochronology and thermochronology has grown enormously over the past ∼25 years. The tool is applicable across much of geologic time, new (U-Th)/He chronometers are under continuous development, and the method is used in a diverse array of studies. Consequently, the technique has a rapidly expanding user base, and new labs are being established worldwide. This presents both opportunities and challenges. Currently there are no universally agreedupon protocols for reporting measured (U-Th)/He data or data derivatives. Nor are there standardized practices for reporting He diffusion kinetic, 4He/3He, or continuous ramped heating data. Approaches for reporting uncertainties associated with all types of data also vary widely. Here, we address these issues. We review the fundamentals of the methods, the types of materials that can be dated, how data are acquired, the process and choices associated with data reduction, and make recommendations for data and uncertainty reporting. We advocate that both the primary measured and derived data be reported, along with statements of assumptions, appropriate references, and clear descriptions of the methods used to compute derived data from measured values. The adoption of more comprehensive and uniform approaches to data and uncertainty reporting will enable data to be re-reduced in the future with different interpretative contexts and data reduction methods, and will facilitate inter-comparison of data sets generated by different laboratories. Together, this will enhance the value, cross-disciplinary use, reliability, and ongoing development of (U-Th)/He chronology.
more »
« less
(U-Th)/He chronology: Part 2. Considerations for evaluating, integrating, and interpreting conventional individual aliquot data
The (U-Th)/He dating technique is an essential tool in Earth science research with diverse thermochronologic, geochronologic, and detrital applications. It is now used in a wide range of tectonic, structural, petrological, sedimentary, geomorphic, volcanological, and planetary studies. While in some circumstances the interpretation of (U-Th)/He data is relatively straightforward, in other cases it is less so. In some geologic contexts, individual analyses of the same mineral from a single sample are expected to yield dates that differ well beyond their analytical uncertainty owing to variable He diffusion kinetics. Although much potential exists to exploit this phenomenon to decipher more detailed thermal history information, distinguishing interpretable intra-sample data variation caused by kinetic differences between crystals from uninterpretable overdispersion caused by other factors can be challenging. Nor is it always simple to determine under what circumstances it is appropriate to integrate multiple individual analyses using a summary statistic such as a mean sample date or to decide on the best approach for incorporating data into the interpretive process of thermal history modeling. Here we offer some suggestions for evaluating data, attempt to summarize the current state of thinking on the statistical characterization of data sets, and describe the practical choices (e.g., model structure, path complexity, data input, weighting of different geologic and chronologic information) that must be made when setting up thermal history models. We emphasize that there are no hard and fast rules in any of these realms, which continue to be an important focus of improvement and community discussion, and no single interpretational and modeling philosophy should be forced on data sets. The guiding principle behind all suggestions made here is for transparency in reporting the steps and assumptions associated with evaluating, integrating, and interpreting data, which will promote the continued development of (U-Th)/He chronology.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10483009
- Publisher / Repository:
- Geological Society of America Bulletin, Geological Society of America
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- GSA Bulletin
- Volume:
- 135
- Issue:
- 1-2
- ISSN:
- 0016-7606
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 137 to 161
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Unconformities in the rock record reflect change(s) in tectonics, climate, and/or sediment routing systems. Pinpointing when sub-unconformity rocks reached the near-surface environment (<1 km depth) remains a challenge that inhibits assignment of causality. We addressed this problem with a new approach using (U-Th)/He analyses of martite (hematite pseudomorph after magnetite). Martitization resets the (U-Th)/He system and links rocks to residence in the near surface. Here, we applied this tool to document the timing of unconformity development in deep time. We integrated martite (U-Th)/He (martite He) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data to constrain the minimum timing of martitization in crystalline basement directly below a major nonconformity in the Colorado Front Range, western United States. Martite comprises hematite crystallites with no remnant magnetite and exhibits crystallographic orientation relationships that suggest martitization occurred by oxidation in the near surface. Individual martite He dates range from 1042 ± 24 Ma to 127 ± 8 Ma (n = 52). Martite He dates are consistent with martitization and associated basement residence in the near surface prior to the Cryogenian, potentially as early as ca. 1040 Ma. Thermal history models show that our spectrum of martite He dates reasonably reflects partial He loss from variably sized He diffusion domains during Phanerozoic burial and reheating. Our work highlights the antiquity of unconformity development in the Colorado Front Range. We suggest paired martite He-EBSD analysis as a new forensic tool for quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of low-temperature alteration, paleotopographic evolution, and unconformity development.more » « less
-
The Wyoming Province of Laurentia, which hosts some of the oldest known crustal material on Earth including zircon 207Pb/206Pb ages up to 3.96 Ga in the Beartooth Mountains, Montana, has been subjected to multiple periods of orogenesis and burial from Proterozoic time to present. We present new zircon U-Pb geochronology and zircon (U-Th)/He thermochronology from Archean-Proterozoic metamorphic rocks exposed in the Bridger Range, Montana, to resolve details of their origins and reconstruct their deep-time tectonothermal history. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and cathodoluminescence imaging, paired with whole rock geochemistry and petrography, was obtained from four metamorphic samples including quartzofeldspathic and garnet-biotite gneisses proximal to the “Great Unconformity” (GU), where Archean-Proterozoic metamorphic rocks are unconformably overlain by ~7.5-9 km of compacted Phanerozoic strata. Single grain 207Pb/206Pb ages range from 4099 ± 44 Ma to 1776 ± 24 Ma, extending the age of known crustal material in the northern Wyoming Province into the Hadean and recording high-grade conditions during the Paleoproterozoic Great Falls/Big Sky orogeny. Zircon (U-Th)/He thermochronology from five metamorphic samples proximal to the GU record cooling ages ranging from 705 Ma to 10.3 Ma, reflecting the variable He diffusivity of individual zircon grains with a large range of radiation damage as proxied by effective uranium (eU) concentrations, which range from ~5 to ~3000 ppm. A negative correlation between cooling age and eU is observed across the five samples suggesting the zircon (U-Th)/He system is sensitive to Proterozoic through Miocene thermal perturbations. Ongoing thermal history modeling seeks to reconstruct the temperature-time histories of these metamorphic rocks, including testing whether this dataset is sensitive to thermal effects imparted by the rifting of Rodina and erosion related to Cryogenian glaciation (i.e., hypotheses related to formation of the GU), and the onset of modern, active extension. These datasets and models provide crucial new constraints on the obscured Proterozoic tectonic history of the northern Wyoming Province and have important implications for our understanding of the formation of early crustal material on Earth.more » « less
-
The Wyoming Province of Laurentia, which hosts some of the oldest known crustal material on Earth including zircon 207Pb/206Pb ages up to 3.96 Ga in the Beartooth Mountains, Montana, has been subjected to multiple periods of orogenesis and burial from Proterozoic time to present. We present new zircon U-Pb geochronology and zircon (U-Th)/He thermochronology from Archean-Proterozoic metamorphic rocks exposed in the Bridger Range, Montana, to resolve details of their origins and reconstruct their deep-time tectonothermal history. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and cathodoluminescence imaging, paired with whole rock geochemistry and petrography, was obtained from four metamorphic samples including quartzofeldspathic and garnet-biotite gneisses proximal to the “Great Unconformity” (GU), where Archean-Proterozoic metamorphic rocks are unconformably overlain by ~7.5-9 km of compacted Phanerozoic strata. Single grain 207Pb/206Pb ages range from 4099 ± 44 Ma to 1776 ± 24 Ma, extending the age of known crustal material in the northern Wyoming Province into the Hadean and recording high-grade conditions during the Paleoproterozoic Great Falls/Big Sky orogeny. Zircon (U-Th)/He thermochronology from five metamorphic samples proximal to the GU record cooling ages ranging from 705 Ma to 10.3 Ma, reflecting the variable He diffusivity of individual zircon grains with a large range of radiation damage as proxied by effective uranium (eU) concentrations, which range from ~5 to ~3000 ppm. A negative correlation between cooling age and eU is observed across the five samples suggesting the zircon (U-Th)/He system is sensitive to Proterozoic through Miocene thermal perturbations. Ongoing thermal history modeling seeks to reconstruct the temperature-time histories of these metamorphic rocks, including testing whether this dataset is sensitive to thermal effects imparted by the rifting of Rodina and erosion related to Cryogenian glaciation (i.e., hypotheses related to formation of the GU), and the onset of modern, active extension. These datasets and models provide crucial new constraints on the obscured Proterozoic tectonic history of the northern Wyoming Province and have important implications for our understanding of the formation of early crustal material on Earth.more » « less
-
Ancient magnetization(s), often recorded by hematite (Fe2O3), provide key paleomagnetic constraints on plate interactions through time. Primary remanent magnetizations may be modified or overprinted by secondary processes that complicate interpretations of paleomagnetic data. Hematite (U‐Th)/He (hematite He) dating has the potential to resolve when secondary magnetizations were acquired. Here, we compare hematite He data and paleomagnetic results in Paleoproterozoic crystalline rocks, meters below a major nonconformity in the Colorado Front Range, USA. Prior work and new rock magnetic data indicate that pervasive hematite alteration records a secondary chemical remanent magnetization (CRM) during the Permo‐Carboniferous Reverse Superchron, coincident with the Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogeny. We target minor hematite‐coated faults cutting basement for (U‐Th)/He analyses because they are of sufficient hematite purity to yield geologically meaningful dates. Two samples yield overlapping and scattered individual hematite He dates ranging from ∼138 to 27 Ma (n = 33), significantly younger than the age of the late Paleozoic CRM. Scanning electron microscopy, electron probe microanalysis, and Raman spectroscopy indicate that aliquots have variable grain size distributions and fluorocarbonate impurities. Thermal history models support hematite on fault surfaces mineralized coeval with CRM acquisition during the late Paleozoic, and hematite He data scatter reflects variable He loss during Mesozoic burial owing to differences in grain size distribution from fault slip comminution and in chemistry among aliquots. Our results underscore the differences in temperature sensitivity and sampling requirements between paleomagnetic and hematite He investigations and illustrate that hematite He dates will usually be younger than preserved remanent magnetizations.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1130/B36268.1
