The origin of life remains one of the greatest enigmas in science. The immense leap in complexity between prebiotic soup and cellular life challenges historically “chemistry-forward” and “biology-backwards” approaches. Evolution must have bridged this gap in complexity, so understanding factors that influence evolutionary outcomes is critical for exploring life’s emergence. Here, we review insights from ecology and evolution and their application throughout abiogenesis. In particular, we discuss how ecological and evolutionary constraints shape the evolution of biological innovation. We propose an “eco-evolutionary” approach, which is agnostic towards particular chemistries or environments and instead explores the several ways that an evolvable system may emerge and gain complexity.
more » « less- PAR ID:
- 10484268
- Publisher / Repository:
- Oxford University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Evolution
- Volume:
- 78
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 0014-3820
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 1-12
- Size(s):
- p. 1-12
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
The addition of parasites to a host population can drive an escalation in the host population's phenotypic complexity – even in the absence of a direct fitness advantage for this increase. Parasites restrict certain regions of the genotype space, decreasing the fitness and the probability of survival of particular host phenotypes. While many artificial life frameworks model a direct correlation between genotype and fitness, the structure of genotype-phenotype maps can have important effects on evolutionary dynamics. Using a simple coarse-grained model for phenotypic transitions during evolution, we show that the escalation in phenotypic complexity under neutral co-evolution is dependent on the structure of the genotype-phenotype map. We discuss these results using the metaphor of evolutionary spandrels and highlight how these structural considerations might allow us to capture biological phenomena more accurately.more » « less
-
Abstract The universal ancestor at the root of the species tree of life depicts a population of organisms with a surprising degree of complexity, posessing genomes and translation systems much like that of microbial life today. As the first life forms were most likely to have been simple replicators, considerable evolutionary change must have taken place prior to the last universal common ancestor. It is often assumed that the lack of earlier branches on the tree of life is due to a prevalence of random horizontal gene transfer that obscured the delineations between lineages and hindered their divergence. Therefore, principles of microbial evolution and ecology may give us some insight into these early stages in the history of life. Here, we synthesize the current understanding of organismal and genome evolution from the perspective of microbial ecology and apply these evolutionary principles to the earliest stages of life on Earth. We focus especially on broad evolutionary modes pertaining to horizontal gene transfer, pangenome structure, and microbial mat communities.
-
Prior research on evolutionary mechanisms during the origin of life has mainly assumed the existence of populations of discrete entities with information encoded in genetic polymers. Recent theoretical advances in autocatalytic chemical ecology establish a broader evolutionary framework that allows for adaptive complexification prior to the emergence of bounded individuals or genetic encoding. This framework establishes the formal equivalence of cells, ecosystems and certain localized chemical reaction systems as autocatalytic chemical ecosystems (ACEs): food-driven (open) systems that can grow due to the action of autocatalytic cycles (ACs). When ACEs are organized in meta-ecosystems, whether they be populations of cells or sets of chemically similar environmental patches, evolution, defined as change in AC frequency over time, can occur. In cases where ACs are enriched because they enhance ACE persistence or dispersal ability, evolution is adaptive and can build complexity. In particular, adaptive evolution can explain the emergence of self-bounded units (e.g. protocells) and genetic inheritance mechanisms. Recognizing the continuity between ecological and evolutionary change through the lens of autocatalytic chemical ecology suggests that the origin of life should be seen as a general and predictable outcome of driven chemical ecosystems rather than a phenomenon requiring specific, rare conditions.
-
Abstract The diversification of many lineages throughout natural history has frequently been associated with evolutionary changes in life cycle complexity. However, our understanding of the processes that facilitate differentiation in the morphologies and functions expressed by organisms throughout their life cycles is limited. Theory suggests that the expression of traits is decoupled across life stages, thus allowing for their evolutionary independence. Although trait decoupling between stages is well established, explanations of how said decoupling evolves have seldom been considered. Because the different phenotypes expressed by organisms throughout their life cycles are coded for by the same genome, trait decoupling must be mediated through divergence in gene expression between stages. Gene duplication has been identified as an important mechanism that enables divergence in gene function and expression between cells and tissues. Because stage transitions across life cycles require changes in tissue types and functions, we investigated the potential link between gene duplication and expression divergence between life stages. To explore this idea, we examined the temporal changes in gene expression across the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) metamorphosis. We found that within homologous groups, more phylogenetically diverged genes exhibited more distinct temporal expression patterns. This relationship scaled such that more phylogenetically diverse homologous groups showed more diverse patterns of gene expression. Furthermore, we found that duplicate genes showed increased stage-specificity relative to singleton genes. Overall, our findings suggest an important link between gene duplication and the evolution of complex life cycles.
-
Abstract The evolution of the primary sex ratio, the proportion of male births in an individual's offspring production strategy, is a frequency‐dependent process that selects against the more common sex. Because reproduction is shaped by the entire life cycle, sex ratio theory would benefit from explicitly two‐sex models that include some form of life cycle structure. We present a demographic approach to sex ratio evolution that combines adaptive dynamics with nonlinear matrix population models. We also determine the evolutionary and convergence stability of singular strategies using matrix calculus. These methods allow the incorporation of any population structure, including multiple sexes and stages, into evolutionary projections. Using this framework, we compare how four different interpretations of sex‐biased offspring costs affect sex ratio evolution. We find that demographic differences affect evolutionary outcomes and that, contrary to prior belief, sex‐biased mortality after parental investment can bias the primary sex ratio (but not the corresponding reproductive value ratio). These results differ qualitatively from the widely held conclusions of previous models that neglect demographic structure.