More Like this

1. RNA polymerase II transcription attenuation at the yeast DNA repair gene DEF1 is biologically significant and dependent on the Hrp1 RNA-recognition motif

   https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac292  

   Amodeo, Maria E. ; Mitchell, Shane P. C. ; Pavan, Vincent ; Kuehner, Jason N. ; Andrews, ed., B. ( October 2022 , G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics)

   Premature transcription termination (i.e. attenuation) is a potent gene regulatory mechanism that represses mRNA synthesis. Attenuation of RNA polymerase II is more prevalent than once appreciated, targeting 10–15% of mRNA genes in yeast through higher eukaryotes, but its significance and mechanism remain obscure. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, polymerase II attenuation was initially shown to rely on Nrd1–Nab3–Sen1 termination, but more recently our laboratory characterized a hybrid termination pathway involving Hrp1, an RNA-binding protein in the 3′-end cleavage factor. One of the hybrid attenuation gene targets is DEF1, which encodes a repair protein that promotes degradation of polymerase II stalled at DNA lesions. In this study, we characterized the chromosomal DEF1 attenuator and the functional role of Hrp1. DEF1 attenuator mutants overexpressed Def1 mRNA and protein, exacerbated polymerase II degradation, and hindered cell growth, supporting a biologically significant DEF1 attenuator function. Using an auxin-induced Hrp1 depletion system, we identified new Hrp1-dependent attenuators in MNR2, SNG1, and RAD3 genes. An hrp1-5 mutant (L205S) known to impair binding to cleavage factor protein Rna14 also disrupted attenuation, but surprisingly no widespread defect was observed for an hrp1-1 mutant (K160E) located in the RNA-recognition motif. We designed a new RNA recognition motif mutant (hrp1-F162W) that altered a highly conserved residue and was lethal in single copy. In a heterozygous strain, hrp1-F162W exhibited dominant-negative readthrough defects at several gene attenuators. Overall, our results expand the hybrid RNA polymerase II termination pathway, confirming that Hrp1-dependent attenuation controls multiple yeast genes and may function through binding cleavage factor proteins and/or RNA.

    

   more » « less
2. The Phantom Mark: Enigmatic roles of phospho‐Threonine 4 modification of the C‐terminal domain of RNA polymerase II

   https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1771  

   Kempen, Ryan P. ; Dabas, Preeti ; Ansari, Aseem Z. ( January 2023 , WIREs RNA)

   The largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) has an unusual carboxyl‐terminal domain (CTD). This domain is composed of a tandemly repeating heptapeptide, Y₁S₂P₃T₄S₅P₆S₇, that has multiple roles in regulating Pol II function and processing newly synthesized RNA. Transient phosphorylation of Ser2 and Ser5 of the YS₂PTS₅PS repeat have well‐defined roles in recruiting different protein complexes and coordinating sequential steps in gene transcription. As such, these phospho‐marks encipher a molecular recognition code, colloquially termed the CTD code. In contrast, the contribution of phospho‐Threonine 4 (pThr4/pT4) to the CTD code remains opaque and contentious. Fuelling the debate on the relevance of this mark to gene expression are the findings that replacing Thr4 with a valine or alanine has varied impact on cellular function in different species and independent proteomic analyses disagree on the relative abundance of pThr4 marks. Yet, substitution with negatively charged residues is lethal and even benign mutations selectively disrupt synthesis and 3′ processing of distinct sets of coding and non‐coding transcripts. Suggestive of non‐canonical roles, pThr4 marked Pol II regulates distinct gene classes in a species‐ and signal‐responsive manner. Hinting at undiscovered roles of this elusive mark, multiple signal‐responsive kinases phosphorylate Thr4 at target genes. Here, we focus on this under‐explored residue and postulate that the pThr4 mark is superimposed on the canonical CTD code to selectively regulate expression of targeted genes without perturbing genome‐wide transcriptional processes.

   This article is categorized under:

   RNA Processing > 3′ End Processing

   RNA Processing > Processing of Small RNAs

   RNA Processing > Splicing Regulation/Alternative Splicing

    

   more » « less
3. Mechanisms and Functions of the RNA Polymerase II General Transcription Machinery during the Transcription Cycle

   https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14020176  

   Archuleta, Stephen R. ; Goodrich, James A. ; Kugel, Jennifer F. ( February 2024 , Biomolecules)

   Central to the development and survival of all organisms is the regulation of gene expression, which begins with the process of transcription catalyzed by RNA polymerases. During transcription of protein-coding genes, the general transcription factors (GTFs) work alongside RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to assemble the preinitiation complex at the transcription start site, open the promoter DNA, initiate synthesis of the nascent messenger RNA, transition to productive elongation, and ultimately terminate transcription. Through these different stages of transcription, Pol II is dynamically phosphorylated at the C-terminal tail of its largest subunit, serving as a control mechanism for Pol II elongation and a signaling/binding platform for co-transcriptional factors. The large number of core protein factors participating in the fundamental steps of transcription add dense layers of regulation that contribute to the complexity of temporal and spatial control of gene expression within any given cell type. The Pol II transcription system is highly conserved across different levels of eukaryotes; however, most of the information here will focus on the human Pol II system. This review walks through various stages of transcription, from preinitiation complex assembly to termination, highlighting the functions and mechanisms of the core machinery that participates in each stage.

    

   more » « less
4. APA-Scan: detection and visualization of 3′-UTR alternative polyadenylation with RNA-seq and 3′-end-seq data

   https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04939-w  

   Fahmi, Naima Ahmed ; Ahmed, Khandakar Tanvir ; Chang, Jae-Woong ; Nassereddeen, Heba ; Fan, Deliang ; Yong, Jeongsik ; Zhang, Wei ( September 2022 , BMC Bioinformatics)

   The eukaryotic genome is capable of producing multiple isoforms from a gene by alternative polyadenylation (APA) during pre-mRNA processing. APA in the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of mRNA produces transcripts with shorter or longer 3′-UTR. Often, 3′-UTR serves as a binding platform for microRNAs and RNA-binding proteins, which affect the fate of the mRNA transcript. Thus, 3′-UTR APA is known to modulate translation and provides a mean to regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. Current bioinformatics pipelines have limited capability in profiling 3′-UTR APA events due to incomplete annotations and a low-resolution analyzing power: widely available bioinformatics pipelines do not reference actionable polyadenylation (cleavage) sites but simulate 3′-UTR APA only using RNA-seq read coverage, causing false positive identifications. To overcome these limitations, we developed APA-Scan, a robust program that identifies 3′-UTR APA events and visualizes the RNA-seq short-read coverage with gene annotations.

   APA-Scan utilizes either predicted or experimentally validated actionable polyadenylation signals as a reference for polyadenylation sites and calculates the quantity of long and short 3′-UTR transcripts in the RNA-seq data. APA-Scan works in three major steps: (i) calculate the read coverage of the 3′-UTR regions of genes; (ii) identify the potential APA sites and evaluate the significance of the events among two biological conditions; (iii) graphical representation of user specific event with 3′-UTR annotation and read coverage on the 3′-UTR regions. APA-Scan is implemented in Python3. Source code and a comprehensive user’s manual are freely available athttps://github.com/compbiolabucf/APA-Scan.

   APA-Scan was applied to both simulated and real RNA-seq datasets and compared with two widely used baselines DaPars and APAtrap. In simulation APA-Scan significantly improved the accuracy of 3′-UTR APA identification compared to the other baselines. The performance of APA-Scan was also validated by 3′-end-seq data and qPCR on mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. The experiments confirm that APA-Scan can detect unannotated 3′-UTR APA events and improve genome annotation.

   APA-Scan is a comprehensive computational pipeline to detect transcriptome-wide 3′-UTR APA events. The pipeline integrates both RNA-seq and 3′-end-seq data information and can efficiently identify the significant events with a high-resolution short reads coverage plots.

    

   more » « less
5. Induction of lysosomal and mitochondrial biogenesis by AMPK phosphorylation of FNIP1

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5559  

   Malik, Nazma ; Ferreira, Bibiana I. ; Hollstein, Pablo E. ; Curtis, Stephanie D. ; Trefts, Elijah ; Weiser Novak, Sammy ; Yu, Jingting ; Gilson, Rebecca ; Hellberg, Kristina ; Fang, Lingjing ; et al ( April 2023 , Science)

   INTRODUCTION Eukaryotes contain a highly conserved signaling pathway that becomes rapidly activated when adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels decrease, as happens during conditions of nutrient shortage or mitochondrial dysfunction. The adenosine monophosphate (AMP)–activated protein kinase (AMPK) is activated within minutes of energetic stress and phosphorylates a limited number of substrates to biochemically rewire metabolism from an anabolic state to a catabolic state to restore metabolic homeostasis. AMPK also promotes prolonged metabolic adaptation through transcriptional changes, decreasing biosynthetic genes while increasing expression of genes promoting lysosomal and mitochondrial biogenesis. The transcription factor EB (TFEB) is a well-appreciated effector of AMPK-dependent signals, but many of the molecular details of how AMPK controls these processes remain unknown. RATIONALE The requirement of AMPK and its specific downstream targets that control aspects of the transcriptional adaptation of metabolism remain largely undefined. We performed time courses examining gene expression changes after various mitochondrial stresses in wild-type (WT) or AMPK knockout cells. We hypothesized that a previously described interacting protein of AMPK, folliculin-interacting protein 1 (FNIP1), may be involved in how AMPK promotes increases in gene expression after metabolic stress. FNIP1 forms a complex with the protein folliculin (FLCN), together acting as a guanosine triphosphate (GTP)–activating protein (GAP) for RagC. The FNIP1-FLCN complex has emerged as an amino acid sensor to the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), involved in how amino acids control TFEB activation. We therefore examined whether AMPK may regulate FNIP1 to dominantly control TFEB independently of amino acids. RESULTS AMPK was found to govern expression of a core set of genes after various mitochondrial stresses. Hallmark features of this response were activation of TFEB and increases in the transcription of genes specifying lysosomal and mitochondrial biogenesis. AMPK directly phosphorylated five conserved serine residues in FNIP1, suppressing the function of the FLCN-FNIP1 GAP complex, which resulted in dissociation of RagC and mTOR from the lysosome, promoting nuclear translocation of TFEB even in the presence of amino acids. FNIP1 phosphorylation was required for AMPK to activate TFEB and for subsequent increases in peroxisome proliferation–activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1α) and estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRα) mRNAs. Cells in which the five serines in FNIP1 were mutated to alanine were unable to increase lysosomal and mitochondrial gene expression programs after treatment with mitochondrial poisons or AMPK activators despite the presence and normal regulation of all other substrates of AMPK. By contrast, neither AMPK nor its control of FNIP1 were needed for activation of TFEB after amino acid withdrawal, illustrating the specificity to energy-limited conditions. CONCLUSION Our data establish FNIP1 as the long-sought substrate of AMPK that controls TFEB translocation to the nucleus, defining AMPK phosphorylation of FNIP1 as a singular event required for increased lysosomal and mitochondrial gene expression programs after metabolic stresses. This study also illuminates the larger biological question of how mitochondrial damage triggers a temporal response of repair and replacement of damaged mitochondria: Within early hours, AMPK-FNIP1–activated TFEB induces a wave of lysosome and autophagy genes to promote degradation of damaged mitochondria, and a few hours later, TFEB–up-regulated PGC1⍺ and ERR⍺ promote expression of a second wave of genes specifying mitochondrial biogenesis. These insights open therapeutic avenues for several common diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, ranging from neurodegeneration to type 2 diabetes to cancer. Mitochondrial damage activates AMPK to phosphorylate FNIP1, stimulating TFEB translocation to the nucleus and sequential waves of lysosomal and mitochondrial biogenesis. After mitochondrial damage, activated AMPK phosphorylates FNIP1 (1), causing inhibition of FLCN-FNIP1 GAP activity (2). This leads to accumulation of RagC in its GTP-bound form, causing dissociation of RagC, mTORC1, and TFEB from the lysosome (3). TFEB is therefore not phosphorylated and translocates to the nucleus, inducing transcription of lysosomal or autophagy genes, with parallel increases in NT-PGC1α mRNA (4), which, in concert with ERRα (5), subsequently induces mitochondrial biogenesis (6). CCCP, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone; CLEAR, coordinated lysosomal expression and regulation; GDP, guanosine diphosphate; P, phosphorylation. [Figure created using BioRender] 

   more » « less