skip to main content

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 11:00 PM ET on Thursday, January 16 until 2:00 AM ET on Friday, January 17 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Assessing the accuracy of paired and random sampling for quantifying plant–plant interactions in natural communities
Abstract

Plant interactions in extreme environments are often inferred from spatial associations and quantified by means of paired sampling. Yet, this method might be confounded by habitat‐sharing effects. Here, we address whether paired and random sampling methods provide similar results at varying levels of environmental heterogeneity. We quantified spatial associations with the two methods at three sites that encompass different micro‐environmental heterogeneity and stress levels: Mediterranean environments in Canary Islands, Spain, and Sardinia, Italy, and a cold alpine environment in Hokkaido, Japan. Then, we simulated plant communities with different levels of species micro‐habitat preferences, environmental heterogeneity, and stress levels. We found that differences in species associations between paired and random sampling were indistinguishable from zero in a homogeneous space. When simulating codispersion over a decreasing abundance gradient, both sampling methods correctly identified facilitation and distinguished it from codispersion. Yet, the pairwise method provided higher facilitation estimates than the random one. At each site, there were strong differences between beneficiary species in their spatial association with nurse species, and associations became more positive with increasing stress in Spain. Most importantly, there were no differences in results yielded by the two methods at any of the different stress levels at the Spanish and Japanese sites. At the Italian site, although micro‐environmental heterogeneity was low, we found weakly significant differences between methods that were unlikely due to habitat‐sharing effects. Thus, the paired sampling method can provide significant insights into net and long‐term effects of plant interactions in spatially conspicuous environments.

  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1757351
PAR ID:
10485197
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Population Ecology
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Population Ecology
ISSN:
1438-3896
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ( , Plant and Soil)
    Abstract Background and Aims

    Species diversity is expected to increase with environmental heterogeneity. For plant communities, this pattern has been confirmed by numerous observational studies. Yet, experimental studies yield inconsistent results potentially because of how experiments create soil heterogeneity or because seeds were sown homogeneously. Using a field experiment, we tested how soil heterogeneity, plant spatial aggregation via seed arrival, and grain size influence plant species richness in a restored grassland.

     Methods

    We manipulated soil heterogeneity and seed arrival in 0.2 × 0.2 or 0.4 × 04 m patches within each 4.0 × 4.6 m plot and allowed community assembly to occur for 4 growing seasons.

     Results

    Despite quantifiable soil differences, soil heterogeneity did not impact total or sown species richness, but did weakly influence non-sown richness. Richness differences were driven by non-sown plant species that likely exhibited higher establishment in aggregated plots due to decreased interspecific competition and conspecific facilitation.

     Conclusion

    Our results suggest that fine-scale soil heterogeneity weakly affects prairie plant diversity, but heterogeneous plant spatial structure can have a stronger effect on diversity. These results suggest that plant colonization may be the primary source of environmental heterogeneity and may explain inconsistent results from soil heterogeneity experiments.

     
    more » « less
  2. ; ( , American Journal of Botany)
    PREMISE

    Environmental heterogeneity influences plant distributions and diversity at several spatial scales. In temperate forests, fine‐scale environmental variation may promote local coexistence among herbaceous species by allowing plants to spatially partition microsites within forest stands. Here we argue that shallow soils, low soil water‐holding capacity and fertility, and reduced light near tree boles should favor short, shallow‐rooted, evergreen species likeAnemone acutilobawith low moisture, nutrient, and light requirements. Farther from trees, richer, deeper soils should favor taller, deeper‐rooted herbs with greater moisture and nutrient demands, such asSanguinaria canadensisandTrillium flexipes.

     METHODS

    We tested these hypotheses by mapping the fine‐scale distributions ofAnemone,Sanguinaria, andTrilliumindividuals within a 50 × 50 m plot, comparing local species’ distributions with respect to soil depth and proximity to neighboring trees, and characterizing intraspecific and interspecific spatial associations.

     RESULTS

    Local plant distributions were consistent with our predictions based on leaf height, physiology, and phenology.Anemonewas found in microsites on shallower soils and closer to trees than eitherSanguinariaorTrillium. In all three species, individual plants were spatially aggregated within 2 m, but spatially segregated from individuals of the other species beyond 2 m.

     CONCLUSIONS

    Differential plant responses to fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity and observed spatial associations suggest that local species‐environment associations could facilitate coexistence. These findings illustrate how fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity coupled with phenological and physiological differences likely contribute to spatial niche partitioning among spring‐flowering forest herbs and maintain high local plant diversity within temperate forests.

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al ( , Frontiers in Marine Science)
    Coral bleaching and mortality can show significant spatial and taxonomic heterogeneity at local scales, highlighting the need to understand the fine-scale drivers and impacts of thermal stress. In this study, we used structure-from-motion photogrammetry to track coral bleaching, mortality, and changes in community composition during the 2019 marine heatwave in Kāneʻohe Bay, Hawaiʻi. We surveyed 30 shallow reef patches every 3 weeks for the duration of the bleaching event (August-December) and one year after, resulting in a total of 210 large-area, high-resolution photomosaics that enabled us to follow the fate of thousands of coral colonies through time. We also measured environmental variables such as temperature, sedimentation, depth, and wave velocity at each of these sites, and extracted estimates of habitat complexity (rugosity R and fractal dimension D) from digital elevation models to better understand their effects on patterns of bleaching and mortality. We found that up to 80% of corals experienced moderate to severe bleaching in this period, with peak bleaching occurring in October when heat stress (Degree Heating Weeks) reached its maximum. Mortality continued to accumulate as bleaching levels dropped, driving large declines in more heat-susceptible species (77% loss of Pocillopora cover) and moderate declines in heat-tolerant species (19% and 23% for Porites compressa and Montipora capitata , respectively). Declines in live coral were accompanied by a rapid increase in algal cover across the survey sites. Spatial differences in bleaching were significantly linked to habitat complexity and coral species composition, with reefs that were dominated by Pocillopora experiencing the most severe bleaching. Mortality was also influenced by species composition, fractal dimension, and site-level differences in thermal stress. Our results show that spatial heterogeneity in the impacts of bleaching are driven by a mix of environmental variation, habitat complexity, and differences in assemblage composition. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ( , Applied Vegetation Science)
    Alday, Josu (Ed.)
    Abstract Question Nurse–beneficiary plant interactions are often used to restore degraded habitats. However, whether and how shifts in plant–plant interactions along the facilitation–competition continuum alter revegetation success has been seldom considered. To test whether and how shifts in plant–plant interactions (due to woody species identity, study site, early life stage, and individual nurse) might alter plant recruitment and thus the success of revegetation projects, we chose a system comprising the Mediterranean dwarf palm ( Chamaerops humilis ) and seven common woody plant species. Location Two human‐degraded sites within Doñana National Park (southwestern Spain). Methods We carried out several well‐replicated field experiments to compare plant performance (seed survival, seedling emergence, seedling survival, seedling recruitment) in the presence and absence of Chamaerops humilis . Results Chamaerops humilis had marked effects on the performance of woody species that, however, changed among life stages. Depending on woody species identity, seed survival was up to 193 times greater in adjacent open spaces than beneath Chamaerops humilis . Conversely, seedling survival and recruitment were up to 19 times greater beneath Chamaerops humilis than in open spaces. Importantly, none of the studied woody species showed greater accumulated recruitment in open spaces than beneath Chamaerops humilis . Interestingly, we found strong inter‐individual palm variation in the sign and strength of their effect on woody plant performance. Conclusions We found strong seed–seedling conflicts the strength of which was species‐specific. The strong inter‐individual palm variation depicts a facilitation–competition continuum with important implications for restoration. We propose several management recommendations across different hierarchical levels (i.e., from individuals to communities) that may increase plant recruitment and therefore the success of revegetation projects. Our results are particularly relevant for restoring arid, semi‐arid and alpine landscapes worldwide where the nurse–beneficiary plant interactions are critical to ameliorating stressful conditions. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al ( , Land)

    Given widespread concerns over human-mediated bee declines in abundance and species richness, conservation efforts are increasingly focused on maintaining natural habitats to support bee diversity in otherwise resource-poor environments. However, natural habitat patches can vary in composition, impacting landscape-level heterogeneity and affecting plant-pollinator interactions. Plant-pollinator networks, especially those based on pollen loads, can provide valuable insight into mutualistic relationships, such as revealing the degree of pollination specialization in a community; yet, local and landscape drivers of these network indices remain understudied within urbanizing landscapes. Beyond networks, analyzing pollen collection can reveal key information about species-level pollen preferences, providing plant restoration information for urban ecosystems. Through bee collection, vegetation surveys, and pollen load identification across ~350 km of urban habitat, we studied the impact of local and landscape-level management on plant-pollinator networks. We also quantified pollinator preferences for plants within urban grasslands. Bees exhibited higher foraging specialization with increasing habitat heterogeneity and visited fewer flowering species (decreased generality) with increasing semi-natural habitat cover. We also found strong pollinator species-specific flower foraging preferences, particularly for Asteraceae plants. We posit that maintaining native forbs and supporting landscape-level natural habitat cover and heterogeneity can provide pollinators with critical food resources across urbanizing ecosystems.

     
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email