More Like this

1. Faster Game Solving via Predictive Blackwell Approachability: Connecting Regret Matching and Mirror Descent

   Farina, G.; Kroer, C.; Sandholm, T. (January 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence)

   null (Ed.)

   Blackwell approachability is a framework for reasoning about repeated games with vector-valued payoffs. We introduce predictive Blackwell approachability, where an estimate of the next payoff vector is given, and the decision maker tries to achieve better performance based on the accuracy of that estimator. In order to derive algorithms that achieve predictive Blackwell approachability, we start by showing a powerful connection between four well-known algorithms. Follow-the-regularized-leader (FTRL) and online mirror descent (OMD) are the most prevalent regret minimizers in online convex optimization. In spite of this prevalence, the regret matching (RM) and regret matching+ (RM+) algorithms have been preferred in the practice of solving large-scale games (as the local regret minimizers within the counterfactual regret minimization framework). We show that RM and RM+ are the algorithms that result from running FTRL and OMD, respectively, to select the halfspace to force at all times in the underlying Blackwell approachability game. By applying the predictive variants of FTRL or OMD to this connection, we obtain predictive Blackwell approachability algorithms, as well as predictive variants of RM and RM+. In experiments across 18 common zero-sum extensive-form benchmark games, we show that predictive RM+ coupled with counterfactual regret minimization converges vastly faster than the fastest prior algorithms (CFR+, DCFR, LCFR) across all games but two of the poker games, sometimes by two or more orders of magnitude. 

   more » « less
2. Faster margin maximization rates for generic and adversarially robust optimization methods

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-025-02283-4  

   Wang, Guanghui; Hu, Zihao; Gentile, Claudio; Muthukumar, Vidya; Abernethy, Jacob (October 2025, Mathematical Programming)

   Abstract First-order optimization methods tend to inherently favor certain solutions over others when minimizing an underdetermined training objective that has multiple global optima. This phenomenon, known asimplicit bias, plays a critical role in understanding the generalization capabilities of optimization algorithms. Recent research has revealed that in separable binary classification tasks gradient-descent-based methods exhibit an implicit bias for the$$\ell _2$$ ${\ell }_2$-maximal margin classifier. Similarly, generic optimization methods, such as mirror descent and steepest descent, have been shown to converge to maximal margin classifiers defined by alternative geometries. While gradient-descent-based algorithms provably achievefastimplicit bias rates, corresponding rates in the literature for generic optimization methods are relatively slow. To address this limitation, we present a series of state-of-the-art implicit bias rates for mirror descent and steepest descent algorithms. Our primary technique involves transforming a generic optimization algorithm into an online optimization dynamic that solves a regularized bilinear game, providing a unified framework for analyzing the implicit bias of various optimization methods. Our accelerated rates are derived by leveraging the regret bounds of online learning algorithms within this game framework. We then show the flexibility of this framework by analyzing the implicit bias inadversarial training, and again obtain significantly improved convergence rates. 

   more » « less
3. Implicit Parameter-free Online Learning with Truncated Linear Models

   Chen, Keyi; Cutkosky, Ashok; Orabona, Francesco (January 2022, International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory)

   Dasgupta, Sanjoy; Haghtalab, Nika (Ed.)

   Parameter-free algorithms are online learning algorithms that do not require setting learning rates. They achieve optimal regret with respect to the distance between the initial point and any competitor. Yet, parameter-free algorithms do not take into account the geometry of the losses. Recently, in the stochastic optimization literature, it has been proposed to instead use truncated linear lower bounds, which produce better performance by more closely modeling the losses. In particular, truncated linear models greatly reduce the problem of overshooting the minimum of the loss function. Unfortunately, truncated linear models cannot be used with parameter-free algorithms because the updates become very expensive to compute. In this paper, we propose new parameter-free algorithms that can take advantage of truncated linear models through a new update that has an “implicit” flavor. Based on a novel decomposition of the regret, the new update is efficient, requires only one gradient at each step, never overshoots the minimum of the truncated model, and retains the favorable parameter-free properties. We also conduct an empirical study demonstrating the practical utility of our algorithms. 

   more » « less
4. Temporal Variability in Implicit Online Learning

   Campolongo, N.; Orabona, F. (January 2020, Advances in neural information processing systems)

   null (Ed.)

   In the setting of online learning, Implicit algorithms turn out to be highly successful from a practical standpoint. However, the tightest regret analyses only show marginal improvements over Online Mirror Descent. In this work, we shed light on this behavior carrying out a careful regret analysis. We prove a novel static regret bound that depends on the temporal variability of the sequence of loss functions, a quantity which is often encountered when considering dynamic competitors. We show, for example, that the regret can be constant if the temporal variability is constant and the learning rate is tuned appropriately, without the need of smooth losses. Moreover, we present an adaptive algorithm that achieves this regret bound without prior knowledge of the temporal variability and prove a matching lower bound. Finally, we validate our theoretical findings on classification and regression datasets. 

   more » « less
5. Stochastic algorithms with geometric step decay converge linearly on sharp functions

   Davis, Damek; Drusvyatskiy, Dmitriy; Charisopoulos, Vasileios (September 2023, Mathematical programming)

   Stochastic (sub)gradient methods require step size schedule tuning to perform well in practice. Classical tuning strategies decay the step size polynomially and lead to optimal sublinear rates on (strongly) convex problems. An alternative schedule, popular in nonconvex optimization, is called geometric step decay and proceeds by halving the step size after every few epochs. In recent work, geometric step decay was shown to improve exponentially upon classical sublinear rates for the class of sharp convex functions. In this work, we ask whether geometric step decay similarly improves stochastic algorithms for the class of sharp weakly convex problems. Such losses feature in modern statistical recovery problems and lead to a new challenge not present in the convex setting: the region of convergence is local, so one must bound the probability of escape. Our main result shows that for a large class of stochastic, sharp, nonsmooth, and nonconvex problems a geometric step decay schedule endows well-known algorithms with a local linear (or nearly linear) rate of convergence to global minimizers. This guarantee applies to the stochastic projected subgradient, proximal point, and prox-linear algorithms. As an application of our main result, we analyze two statistical recovery tasks—phase retrieval and blind deconvolution—and match the best known guarantees under Gaussian measurement models and establish new guarantees under heavy-tailed distributions. 

   more » « less