More Like this

1. The history of natural history and race: Decolonizing human dimensions of ecology

   https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2748  

   Miriti, Maria N.; Rawson, Ariel J.; Mansfield, Becky (November 2022, Ecological Applications)

   Abstract Natural history, loosely defined as the observational study of organisms in the habitats where they occur, is recognized at the roots of ecology. Although the centrality of natural history in ecology has shifted over time, natural history is currently in resurgence: many again consider it to be the foundation of ecological and evolutionary inquiry and advocate the value of organism‐centered approaches to address contemporary ecological challenges. Educators identify natural history as the foundational entryway into the practice of ecology, for example in the Ecological Society of America's Four‐Dimensional Ecology Education (4DEE) framework. A strong natural history foundation can help generate testable hypotheses to refine mechanistic understanding of the drivers regulating species distributions and abundances and to inform restoration and conservation efforts. Given the resurgence of natural history as the foundation for ecological knowledge and practice, it is important to recognize that natural history has a long history of racism that has impacted ecological thought and priorities. This history shapes not only who conducts ecological science but also foundational ecological concepts. For example, natural history's emphasis on pristine nature untouched by humans disregards or appropriates stewardship and knowledge of most of the world's population. Because of the legacy of chattel slavery, this exclusion is particularly strong for people of African descent. This exclusion narrows ecological inquiry, limits the capacity to find solutions to ecological problems, and risks interventions that perpetuate the relation between eugenics, ecological knowledge, and natural systems. If ecology is to become an inclusive, responsive, and resilient discipline, this knowledge gap must be addressed. We here present the colonial and racist underpinnings of natural history and offer strategies to expand inclusion in the study of nature. Natural history was steeped in racism, providing a hierarchy of cultures and a taxonomy of races. Complementing growing interest in traditional and Indigenous ecological knowledge, we focus on Black ecological knowledge, for example in the study of “maroon ecologies.” Addressing the racist history of natural history is necessary for removing structural and racist barriers to diverse participation and expanding ecological knowledge bases in service of better and more just science. 

   more » « less
2. The History of Science and the Science of History: Computational Methods, Algorithms, and the Future of the Field

   Gibson, Abraham; Ermus, Cindy (September 2019, Isis)

   Many researchers insist that computational methods will transform the historical profession, while an equally large number reject these claims as unwarranted hype. In this study, we attempt to place the debate in historical and social context. The article is divided into three parts. The first part offers a brief review of computational history. We ask whether the “computational turn” bears any resemblance to quantitative history, and how it fits within the digital humanities. The second part describes our recent attempts to apply computational methods to an existing project in the history of science using a standardized workflow. We demonstrate that each step of the workflow adds another layer of subjectivity. The third part reflects on what computational methods mean for the historical profession. We systematically review the positive aspects of computational history (open access, interdisciplinary collaboration, and new perspectives) as well as the negative aspects (inequality, fragility, and the threat of automation), and we offer prescriptions based on our experiences. 

   more » « less
3. The History of Science and the Science of History: Computational Methods, Algorithms, and the Future of the Field

   https://doi.org/10.1086/705543  

   Gibson, Abraham; Ermus, Cindy (September 2019, Isis)
4. Genetic history of the population of Crete

   https://doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12328  

   Drineas, Petros; Tsetsos, Fotis; Plantinga, Anna; Lazaridis, Iosif; Yannaki, Evangelia; Razou, Anna; Kanaki, Katerina; Michalodimitrakis, Manolis; Perez‐Jimenez, Francisco; De Silvestro, Giustina; et al (June 2019, Annals of Human Genetics)

   Abstract The medieval history of several populations often suffers from scarcity of contemporary records resulting in contradictory and sometimes biased interpretations by historians. This is the situation with the population of the island of Crete, which remained relatively undisturbed until the Middle Ages when multiple wars, invasions, and occupations by foreigners took place. Historians have considered the effects of the occupation of Crete by the Arabs (in the 9th and 10th centuries C.E.) and the Venetians (in the 13th to the 17th centuries C.E.) to the local population. To obtain insights on such effects from a genetic perspective, we studied representative samples from 17 Cretan districts using the Illumina 1 million or 2.5 million arrays and compared the Cretans to the populations of origin of the medieval conquerors and settlers. Highlights of our findings include (1) small genetic contributions from the Arab occupation to the extant Cretan population, (2) low genetic contribution of the Venetians to the extant Cretan population, and (3) evidence of a genetic relationship among the Cretans and Central, Northern, and Eastern Europeans, which could be explained by the settlement in the island of northern origin tribes during the medieval period. Our results show how the interaction between genetics and the historical record can help shed light on the historical record. 

   more » « less
5. The history and challenge of grassy biomes

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add1347  

   Strömberg, Caroline A.; Staver, A. Carla (August 2022, Science)

   Subtitle: Grassy biomes are >20 million years old but are undervalued and under threat today. Abstract: Grassy biomes—from the steppes of Mongolia to the savannas of Tanzania—are predicted to be the ecosystems hardest hit by the ongoing climate and land use crises. The history of humans has been profoundly intertwined with grassy biomes. Homo evolved in the savannas 2 million years ago (Ma), and agricultural societies arose through the domestication of grasses, such as wheat and barley, 10,000 years ago. These grass crops, as well as corn and rice, remain dominant staple foods globally (1). Livestock production also centers in areas that were once (and sometimes still are) native grasslands. Grassy biomes harbor distinct and diverse sets of plants and animals that have adapted to these environments through millions of years of evolution (2). As the biodiversity and economic prominence of grassy biomes are increasingly being recognized, there is a demand for better understanding of their past and present function to inform policy and management. 

   more » « less