skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Field-realistic exposure to neonicotinoid and sulfoximine insecticides impairs visual and olfactory learning and memory in Polistes paper wasps
ABSTRACT Exposure to insecticides may contribute to global insect declines due to sublethal insecticide effects on non-target species. Thus far, much research on non-target insecticide effects has focused on neonicotinoids in a few bee species. Much less is known about effects on other insect taxa or newer insecticides, such as sulfoxaflor. Here, we studied the effects of an acute insecticide exposure on both olfactory and visual learning in free-moving Polistes fuscatus paper wasps. Wasps were exposed to a single, field-realistic oral dose of low-dose imidacloprid, high-dose imidacloprid or sulfoxaflor. Then, visual and olfactory learning and short-term memory were assessed. We found that acute insecticide exposure influenced performance, as sulfoxaflor- and high-dose imidacloprid-exposed wasps made fewer correct choices than control wasps. Notably, both visual and olfactory performance were similarly impaired. Wasps treated with high-dose imidacloprid were also less likely to complete the learning assay than wasps from the other treatment groups. Instead, wasps remained stationary and unmoving in the testing area, consistent with imidacloprid interfering with motor control. Finally, wasps treated with sulfoxaflor were more likely to die in the week after treatment than wasps in the other treatment groups. Our findings demonstrate that sublethal, field-realistic dosages of both neonicotinoid- and sulfoximine-based insecticides impair wasp learning and short-term memory, which may have additional effects on survival and motor functioning. Insecticides have broadly detrimental effects on diverse non-target insects that may influence foraging effectiveness, pollination services and ecosystem function.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2134910
PAR ID:
10491360
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
Journal of Experimental Biology
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Experimental Biology
Volume:
226
Issue:
22
ISSN:
0022-0949
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Insecticides are a major tool for controlling pest species. Their widespread use results in damage to non-targeted insects, with honey bees particularly at risk. During foraging, honey bees learn and remember floral charac teristics that are associated with food. As insect pollinators, honey bees inadvertently contact chemicals which can have multiple negative impacts. The toxicity of two insecticides from different classes, ethion (47.79 mg a.i. L − 1 ) and hexaflumuron (500 mg a.i.L − 1 ), on learning, memory, and sensory perception were evaluated. We found that oral exposure to ethion had adverse effects on learned proboscis extension toward reward-associated odors and colors. In addition, we showed reduced sucrose consumption and sucrose responsiveness after expo sure. Hexaflumuron also impaired olfactory learning and memory and decreased responsiveness to sucrose and water. Exposure to sub-lethal concentration of the cholinergic organophosphate insecticide, ethion (47.79 mg a.i. L − 1 ), and the field-recommended concentration of hexaflumuron (500 mg a.i.L − 1 ), significantly impaired behavior involved in foraging. Our results suggest that several behavioral characteristics of honey bees be evaluated when testing an insecticide rather than relying on just one behavioral measure. 
    more » « less
  2. The European honey bee, Apis mellifera L., is the single most valuable managed pollinator in the world. Poor colony health or unusually high colony losses of managed honey bees result from a myriad of stressors, which are more harmful in combination. Climate change is expected to accentuate the effects of these stressors, but the physiological and behavioral responses of honey bees to elevated temperatures while under simultaneous influence of one or more stressors remain largely unknown. Here we test the hypothesis that exposure to acute, sublethal doses of neonicotinoid insecticides reduce thermal tolerance in honey bees. We administered to bees oral doses of imidacloprid and acetamiprid at 1/5, 1/20, and1/100 of LD50 and measured their heat tolerance 4 h post- feeding, using both dynamic and static protocols. Contrary to our expectations, acute exposure to sublethal doses of both insecticides resulted in higher thermal tolerance and greater survival rates of bees. Bees that ingested the higher doses of insecticides displayed a critical thermal maximum from 2˚C to 5 ˚C greater than that of the control group, and 67%–87% reduction in mortality. Our study suggests a resilience of honey bees to high temperatures when other stressors are present, which is consistent with studies in other insects. We discuss the implications of these results and hypothesize that this compensatory effect is likely due to induction of heat shock proteins by the insecticides, which provides temporary protection from elevated temperatures 
    more » « less
  3. The Colorado potato beetle (CPB) is the primary defoliator of potatoes and is notorious for its ability to develop resistance to various insecticides. This remarkable adaptability may partly reflect selective pressures imposed due to the beetle’s coevolution with toxic Solanaceous host plants. As the initial interface between the environment and the insect olfactory system, odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) may sequester excess harmful molecules, such as insecticides and plant allelochemicals, in the perireceptor space, mitigating deleterious effects on vulnerable olfactory sensory neuronal dendrites. In this study, we identified an antenna-specific OBP (LdecOBP33) that is significantly upregulated in a pesticide resistant strain compared to a susceptible one. Competitive displacement fluorescence binding assays demonstrated that the LdecOBP33 protein exhibited broad affinity toward a range of plant volatiles and insecticides. Silencing LdecOBP33 decreased the beetle’s resistance to imidacloprid and impaired its ability to locate host plants. Together, these findings provide insight into a key molecular factor involved in the CPB’s response to environmental challenges, suggesting a potential link between insects’ adaptation to xenobiotics and their olfactory processing. 
    more » « less
  4. Entomopathogenic fungi show significant promise as effective and ecological friendly alternatives to chemical insecticides for insect pest control. However, little is known concerning their effects on soil ecosystems, especially in comparison to application of chemical insecticides. Here, we examined the effects of one biological and two chemical insecticides, Metarhizium anisopliae, imidacloprid (IMI) and emamectin benzoate (EMB) on microbial community structure, metabolic functioning, and soil biochemistry. Treatment with EMB and IMI, reduced Actinobacteriota populations, while increasing that of Acidobacteriota. However, these populations were not significantly altered under M. anisopliae treatment. Chemical pesticides also altered fungal communities including potential pathogens. Activities of soil beneficial nitrogen-cycling-related enzymes were reduced after application of IMI and EMB, but were increased after treatment with M. anisopliae. Metagenomics analysis showed that IMI treatment reduced levels of carbon and nitrogen-related metabolic pathways. However, M. anisopliae treatment increased representation of key enzymes involved in the carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling important for maintenance of soil fertility. Insecticides treatments altered the abundance of a number antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) but not virulence factors (VFs), whereas application of M. anisopliae resulted had only minimal effects. These findings highlight the consequences of use of biological vs. chemical pesticides on soil microbiology can affect plant and ecosystem health indicating that the fungal biological control agent, M. anisopliae likely has far less detrimental and potentially beneficial effects on soil ecology as compared to chemical pesticides. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Management of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) is reliant on conventional insecticides that can negatively affect non-target arthropods. Calantha™ (active ingredient: ledprona) is a sprayable double-stranded RNA biopesticide specific forL decemlineataproteasome subunit beta 5 gene that triggers the RNA-interference pathway and is designed to have limited non-target effects. To test this hypothesis, we conducted two years of field trials in Idaho, Wisconsin, and Maine comparing arthropod responses to different insecticide regimes, with and without Calantha, targeting the Colorado potato beetle. Comparisons of arthropod abundance among treatments showed no evidence of effects of Calantha on non-target arthropods, including beneficials (predators, parasitoids), “neutrals” (i.e., non-pests), and other beetle species. Conventional insecticides generally showed more non-target effects, and responses were always stronger for arthropods from vacuum samples than pitfall samples. Insecticide programs featuring Calantha, especially in rotation with other biorational products, may reduce pests while preserving beneficial arthropods and contribute to biological control of arthropod pests in potato fields. 
    more » « less