The origin of the very low luminosity of Uranus is unknown, as is the source of the internal tidal dissipation required by the orbits of the Uranian moons. Models of the interior of Uranus often assume that it is inviscid throughout, but recent experiments show that this assumption may not be justified; most of the interior of Uranus lies below the freezing temperature of H2O. We find that the stable solid phase of H2O, which is superionic, has a large viscosity controlled by the crystalline oxygen sublattice. We examine the consequences of finite viscosity by combining ab initio determinations of the thermal conductivity and other material properties of superionic H2O with a thermal evolution model that accounts for heat trapped in the growing frozen core. The high viscosity provides a means of trapping heat in the deep interior while also providing a source of tidal dissipation. The frozen core grows with time because its outer boundary is governed by the freezing transition rather than compositional layering. We find that the presence of a growing frozen core explains the anomalously low heat flow of Uranus. Our thermal evolution model also predicts time-varying tidal dissipation that matches the requirements of the orbits of Miranda, Ariel, and Umbriel. We make predictions that are testable by future space missions, including the tidal Love number of Uranus and the current recessional rates of its moons.
The contrasting internal luminosity of Uranus and Neptune present a challenge to our understanding of the origin and evolution of these bodies, as well as extra-solar ice giants. The thermal evolution of Neptune is known to be nearly consistent with an entirely fluid interior, but this is not a unique solution, and does not account for the tidal dissipation required by the migration of its moons. We examine a model that has been previously shown to explain the thermal and tidal evolution of Uranus: one that features a growing, frozen core. The core traps heat in the interior, affecting the cooling time scale, and provides a source of tidal dissipation. We review the growing, frozen core model, and the computation of thermal and tidal evolution. We then apply this model to Neptune. We find that the growing frozen core model can account for the observed internal luminosity of Neptune and the migration of its moons, in the form of resonances that were either encountered or avoided in the past. We discuss prospects for observational tests of the growing frozen core model and possible implications for understanding the gas giants.
more » « less- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10491455
- Publisher / Repository:
- Springer Science + Business Media
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Space Science Reviews
- Volume:
- 220
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 0038-6308
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract The impact of the inner structure and thermal history of planets on their observable features, such as luminosity or magnetic field, crucially depends on the poorly known heat and charge transport properties of their internal layers. The thermal and electric conductivities of different phases of water (liquid, solid, and super-ionic) occurring in the interior of ice giant planets, such as Uranus or Neptune, are evaluated from equilibrium ab initio molecular dynamics, leveraging recent progresses in the theory and data analysis of transport in extended systems. The implications of our findings on the evolution models of the ice giants are briefly discussed.
-
more » « less
Abstract Recent planetary data and geophysical modeling suggest that hydrothermal activity is ongoing under the ice crust of Enceladus, one of Saturn's moons. According to these models, hydrothermal flow in the porous, rocky core of the satellite is driven by tidal deformation that induces dissipation and volumetric internal heating. Despite the effort in the modeling of Enceladus' interior, systematic understanding—and even basic scaling laws—of internally heated porous convection and hydrothermal activity are still lacking. In this article, using an idealized model of an internally heated porous medium, we explore numerically and theoretically the flows that develop close to and far from the onset of convection. In particular, we quantify heat‐transport efficiency by convective flows as well as the typical extent and intensity of heat flux anomalies created at the top of the porous layer. With our idealized model, we derive simple and general laws governing the temperature and hydrothermal velocity that can be driven in the oceans of icy moons. In the future, these laws could help better constraining models of the interior of Enceladus and other icy satellites.
-
more » « less
ABSTRACT The origin of Uranus and Neptune has long been challenging to explain, due to the large orbital distances from the Sun. After a planetary embryo has been formed, the main accretion processes are likely pebble, gas, and planetesimal accretion. Previous studies of Uranus and Neptune formation typically do not consider all three processes; and furthermore, do not investigate how the formation of the outer planet impacts the inner planet. In this paper, we study the concurrent formation of Uranus and Neptune via pebble, gas, and planetesimal accretion. We use a dust-evolution model to predict the size and mass flux of pebbles, and derive our own fit for gas accretion. We do not include migration, but consider a wide range of formation locations between 12 and $40\, \textrm {au}$. If the planetary embryos form at the same time and with the same mass, our formation model with an evolving dust population is unable to produce Uranus and Neptune analogues. This is because the mass difference between the planets and the H–He mass fractions become too high. However, if the outer planetary embryo forms earlier and/or more massive than the inner embryo, the two planets do form in a few instances when the disc is metal-rich and dissipates after a few Myr. Furthermore, our study suggests that in situ formation is rather unlikely. Nevertheless, giant impacts and/or migration could potentially aid in the formation, and future studies including these processes could bring us one step closer to understanding how Uranus and Neptune formed.
-
Aims. The orbit of the outer satellite Alexhelios of (216) Kleopatra is already constrained by adaptive-optics astrometry obtained with the VLT/SPHERE instrument. However, there is also a preceding occultation event in 1980 attributed to this satellite. Here, we try to link all observations, spanning 1980–2018, because the nominal orbit exhibits an unexplained shift by + 60° in the true longitude. Methods. Using both a periodogram analysis and an ℓ = 10 multipole model suitable for the motion of mutually interacting moons about the irregular body, we confirmed that it is not possible to adjust the respective osculating period P 2 . Instead, we were forced to use a model with tidal dissipation (and increasing orbital periods) to explain the shift. We also analysed light curves spanning 1977–2021, and searched for the expected spin deceleration of Kleopatra. Results. According to our best-fit model, the observed period rate is Ṗ 2 = (1.8 ± 0.1) × 10 −8 d d −1 and the corresponding time-lag Δ t 2 = 42 s of tides, for the assumed value of the Love number k 2 = 0.3. This is the first detection of tidal evolution for moons orbiting 100 km asteroids. The corresponding dissipation factor Q is comparable with that of other terrestrial bodies, albeit at a higher loading frequency 2| ω − n |. We also predict a secular evolution of the inner moon, Ṗ 1 = 5.0 × 10 −8 , as well as a spin deceleration of Kleopatra, Ṗ 0 = 1.9 × 10 −12 . In alternative models, with moons captured in the 3:2 mean-motion resonance or more massive moons, the respective values of Δ t 2 are a factor of between two and three lower. Future astrometric observations using direct imaging or occultations should allow us to distinguish between these models, which is important for our understanding of the internal structure and mechanical properties of (216) Kleopatra.more » « less
