An official website of the United States government
If a parallel program has determinacy race(s), different schedules can result in memory accesses that observe different values --- various race-detection tools have been designed to find such bugs. A key component of race detectors is an algorithm for series-parallel (SP) maintenance, which identifies whether two accesses are logically parallel. This paper describes an asymptotically optimal algorithm, called WSP-Order, for performing SP maintenance in programs with fork-join (or nested) parallelism. Given a fork-join program with T1 work and T∞ span, WSP-Order executes it while also maintaining SP relationships in O(T1/P + T∞) time on P processors, which is asymptotically optimal. At the heart of WSP-Order is a work-stealing scheduler designed specifically for SP maintenance. We also implemented C-RACER, a race-detector based on WSP-Order within the Cilk Plus runtime system, and evaluated its performance on five benchmarks. Empirical results demonstrate that when run sequentially, it performs almost as well as previous best sequential race detectors. More importantly, when run in parallel, it achieves almost as much speedup as the original program without race-detection.
more »
« less
Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs):37th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2023)
Much of the past work on dynamic data-race and determinacy-race detection algorithms for task parallelism has focused on structured parallelism with fork-join constructs and, more recently, with future constructs. This paper addresses the problem of dynamic detection of data-races and determinacy-races in task-parallel programs with promises, which are more general than fork-join constructs and futures. The motivation for our work is twofold. First, promises have now become a mainstream synchronization construct, with their inclusion in multiple languages, including C++, JavaScript, and Java. Second, past work on dynamic data-race and determinacy-race detection for task-parallel programs does not apply to programs with promises, thereby identifying a vital need for this work. This paper makes multiple contributions. First, we introduce a featherweight programming language that captures the semantics of task-parallel programs with promises and provides a basis for formally defining determinacy using our semantics. This definition subsumes functional determinacy (same output for same input) and structural determinacy (same computation graph for same input). The main theoretical result shows that the absence of data races is sufficient to guarantee determinacy with both properties. We are unaware of any prior work that established this result for task-parallel programs with promises. Next, we introduce a new Dynamic Race Detector for Promises that we call DRDP. DRDP is the first known race detection algorithm that executes a task-parallel program sequentially without requiring the serial-projection property; this is a critical requirement since programs with promises do not satisfy the serial-projection property in general. Finally, the paper includes experimental results obtained from an implementation of DRDP. The results show that, with some important optimizations introduced in our work, the space and time overheads of DRDP are comparable to those of more restrictive race detection algorithms from past work. To the best of our knowledge, DRDP is the first determinacy race detector for task-parallel programs with promises.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2204986
- PAR ID:
- 10493416
- Editor(s):
- Ali, Karim; Salvaneschi, Guido
- Publisher / Repository:
- Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Race detection Promise Determinism Determinacy-race Serial projection Software and its engineering → Software creation and management Software and its engineering → Software verification and validation Software and its engineering → Software defect analysis Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging Software and its engineering → Software notations and tools Software and its engineering → General programming languages Software and its engineering → Concurrent programming languages
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Recent work has proposed a memory property for parallel programs, called disentanglement, and showed that it is pervasive in a variety of programs, written in different languages, ranging from C/C++ to Parallel ML, and showed that it can be exploited to improve the performance of parallel functional programs. All existing work on disentanglement, however, considers the fork/join model for parallelism and does not apply to futures, the more powerful approach to parallelism. This is not surprising: fork/join parallel programs exhibit a reasonably strict dependency structure (e.g., series-parallel DAGs), which disentanglement exploits. In contrast, with futures, parallel computations become first-class values of the language, and thus can be created, and passed between functions calls or stored in memory, just like other ordinary values, resulting in complex dependency structures, especially in the presence of mutable state. For example, parallel programs with futures can have deadlocks, which is impossible with fork-join parallelism. In this paper, we are interested in the theoretical question of whether disentanglement may be extended beyond fork/join parallelism, and specifically to futures. We consider a functional language with futures, Input/Output (I/O), and mutable state (references) and show that a broad range of programs written in this language are disentangled. We start by formalizing disentanglement for futures and proving that purely functional programs written in this language are disentangled. We then generalize this result in three directions. First, we consider state (effects) and prove that stateful programs are disentangled if they are race free. Second, we show that race freedom is sufficient but not a necessary condition and non-deterministic programs, e.g. those that use atomic read-modify-operations and some non-deterministic combinators, may also be disentangled. Third, we prove that disentangled task-parallel programs written with futures are free of deadlocks, which arise due to interactions between state and the rich dependencies that can be expressed with futures. Taken together, these results show that disentanglement generalizes to parallel programs with futures and, thus, the benefits of disentanglement may go well beyond fork-join parallelism.more » « less
-
Modern programming languages offer special syntax and semantics for logical fork-join parallelism in the form of parallel loops, allowing them to be nested, e.g., a parallel loop within another parallel loop. This expressiveness comes at a price, however: on modern multicore systems, realizing logical parallelism results in overheads due to the creation and management of parallel tasks, which can wipe out the benefits of parallelism. Today, we expect application programmers to cope with it by manually tuning and optimizing their code. Such tuning requires programmers to reason about architectural factors hidden behind layers of software abstractions, such as task scheduling and load balancing. Managing these factors is particularly challenging when workloads are irregular because their performance is input-sensitive. This paper presents HBC, the first compiler that translates C/C++ programs with high-level, fork-join constructs (e.g., OpenMP) to binaries capable of automatically controlling the cost of parallelism and dealing with irregular, input-sensitive workloads. The basis of our approach is Heartbeat Scheduling, a recent proposal for automatic granularity control, which is backed by formal guarantees on performance. HBC binaries outperform OpenMP binaries for workloads for which even entirely manual solutions struggle to find the right balance between parallelism and its costs.more » « less
-
A determinacy race occurs if two or more logically parallel instructions access the same memory location and at least one of them tries to modify its content. Races are often undesirable as they can lead to nondeterministic and incorrect program behavior. A data race is a special case of a determinacy race which can be eliminated by associating a mutual-exclusion lock with the memory location in question or allowing atomic accesses to it. However, such solutions can reduce parallelism by serializing all accesses to that location. For associative and commutative updates to a memory cell, one can instead use a reducer, which allows parallel race-free updates at the expense of using some extra space. More extra space usually leads to more parallel updates, which in turn contributes to potentially lowering the overall execution time of the program. We start by asking the following question. Given a fixed budget of extra space for mitigating the cost of races in a parallel program, which memory locations should be assigned reducers and how should the space be distributed among those reducers in order to minimize the overall running time?We argue that under reasonable conditions the races of a program can be captured by a directed acyclic graph (DAG), with nodes representing memory cells and arcs representing read-write dependencies between cells. We then formulate our original question as an optimization problem on this DAG. We concentrate on a variation of this problem where space reuse among reducers is allowed by routing every unit of extra space along a (possibly different) source to sink path of the DAG and using it in the construction of multiple (possibly zero) reducers along the path. We consider two different ways of constructing a reducer and the corresponding duration functions (i.e., reduction time as a function of space budget).more » « less
-
Chen, Ho-Lin; Hon, Wing-Kai; Tsai, Meng-Tsung (Ed.)Balanced search trees are widely used in computer science to efficiently maintain dynamic ordered data. To support efficient set operations (e.g., union, intersection, difference) using trees, the join-based framework is widely studied. This framework has received particular attention in the parallel setting, and has been shown to be effective in enabling simple and theoretically efficient set operations on trees. Despite the widespread adoption of parallel join-based trees, a major drawback of previous work on such data structures is the inefficiency of their input/output (I/O) access patterns. Some recent work (e.g., C-trees and PaC-trees) focused on more I/O-friendly implementations of these algorithms. Surprisingly, however, there have been no results on bounding the I/O-costs for these algorithms. It remains open whether these algorithms can provide tight, provable guarantees in I/O-costs on trees. This paper studies efficient parallel algorithms for set operations based on search tree algorithms using a join-based framework, with a special focus on achieving I/O efficiency in these algorithms. To better capture the I/O-efficiency in these algorithms in parallel, we introduce a new computational model, the Fork-Join I/O Model, to measure the I/O costs in fork-join parallelism. This model measures the total block transfers (I/O work) and their critical path (I/O span). Under this model, we propose our new solution based on B-trees. Our parallel algorithm computes the union, intersection, and difference of two B-trees with O(m log_B(n/m)) I/O work and O(log_B m ⋅ log₂ log_B n + log_B n) I/O span, where n and m ≤ n are the sizes of the two trees, and B is the block size.more » « less
