An official website of the United States government
Active management such as prescribed fire and thinning can restore savanna and prairie ecosystem to maintain a full suite of ecosystem services and create suitable habitat for wildlife species such as white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Active management comes with the cost of management and acceptance of management tools. The south-central transitional ecoregion of the USA, which otherwise was a mixture of forest, savanna, and tallgrass prairie, is increasing in woody plant dominance due to the exclusion of fire and other anthropogenic factors. Deer hunting is a vital source of revenue generation to offset the landowner’s management cost in the region. We studied Oklahoma landowners’ perceptions regarding active and sustainable management of forest and rangeland for deer habitat using two established theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as well as expanded theories adding moral norms. We analyzed mailed survey data using structural equation modeling. We found that subjective norms and perceived behavior control significantly affected deer hunting intention when moral norms were introduced into the model. Attitudes independently significantly affected intentions of deer hunting but have negative relations with the intentions. The study suggested that landowners have positive social pressure and were interested in active management but associated financial burden and risk could be shaping negative attitudes. Keywords Theory of planned behavior ● Theory of reasoned action ● Moral norms ● Prescribed fire ● White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)
more »
« less
Economic returns and the perceived obstacles to adopting active management in the forest-grassland transition ecoregion in south-central USA
Forest-grassland ecotones are a mosaic of grassland, savanna, and upland forest. As such, landowners may have opportunities to choose to manage their lands for multiple objectives. We estimated the economic returns from managing forest and rangeland in southeastern Oklahoma, USA to produce different combinations of timber, cattle forage, and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus Zimmermann) browse for a 40-year period. We further conducted a survey to understand landowner perceptions of obstacles to adopting active management that involve timber harvest and prescribed fire. The highest net return was obtained from the treatment with harvested timber that was burned every four years (uneven-aged woodland/forest) because it had the greatest gross return from a combination of timber (46%), cattle forage (42%), and deer browse (11%). The return from this treatment was greater than that for managed for timber only (closed-canopy forest) or prioritizing cattle and deer (savanna). Survey results suggested that landowners were aware of the benefits of active management but that the majority (66%) considered cost a major obstacle in the management of their forest or rangeland. In particular, women forestland owners and older landowners considered cost an obstacle. Our findings advocate integrated timber, cattle, and deer management as the best economic strategy within the forest-grassland ecotone and for targeted outreach and landowner education related to the benefits of active management.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1946093
- PAR ID:
- 10494289
- Publisher / Repository:
- ELSEVIER
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Volume:
- 343
- Issue:
- C
- ISSN:
- 0301-4797
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 118225
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) hunting is an important economic activity associated with the management of forests and rangelands in the USA, with over $12.9 billion dollars of related annual expenditures. Reducing tree cover through thinning and prescribed fire both have the potential to increase the quantity and quality of deer forage. We evaluated the long-term impacts of eight different combinations of fire return intervals and tree harvest on forage productivity and protein content of the forage. Based on management regime, study units ranged from savanna to closed-canopy forest. Aboveground net primary production (ANPP) of six functional groups (grass, panicum, forb, legume, woody, sedge) of understory vegetation was measured in October 2019 and 2020 using destructive sampling. Samples for foliar crude protein (CP) concentration were collected in spring, summer, and fall of 2020. Total understory ANPP ranged from 2.9 to 466.3 g m− 2 and was up to 566% greater in savanna systems maintained by frequent fire (return interval of three years or less) than in non-burned forest treatments. Annual burning resulted in ANPP dominated by herbaceous plants composed mostly of firetolerant grasses (e.g., Andropogon gerardii, Schizachyrium scoparium). Longer fire return intervals or no fire resulted in roughly equal ANPP from understory woody and herbaceous species. Crude protein concentrations were up to 45.7% greater in the woodland and forest units than in the savanna units for seven of the eleven species sampled. The greater CP in the forests was most noticeable in the summer when deer needs for quality forage are substantial. Increased protein concentrations of understory species in the forests, but greater ANPP in the savannas indicate that managing for a mix of savanna and woodland could be ideal for balancing forage quantity with increased forage protein.more » « less
-
In the United States (US), family forest owners, a group that includes individuals, families, trusts, and estates, are the largest single landowner category, owning approximately one-third of the nation's forests. These landowners' individualized decision-making on forest management has a profound impact on US forest cover and function at both local and regional scales. We sought to understand perceptions among family forest specialists of: climate impacts and adaptation options across different forested US regions; how family forest owners are taking climate adaptation into consideration in their forest management, if at all; and major barriers to more active management for adaptation among family forest owners. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 48 forest experts across the US who work with family forest owners, including extension specialists, state forestry agency employees, and consulting foresters who focus on family forest engagement. Our interviewees shared details on how both climate change impacts and forest management for climate adaptation vary across the US, and they perceived a lack of active forest management by family forest owners. They explained that western forest landowners confronting the imminent threat of catastrophic wildfires are more likely to see a need for active forest management. By contrast, in the east, where most forestland is privately owned, interviewees said that landowners see relatively fewer climate impacts on their forests and less need for forest management to respond to climate change. Perceived barriers to more active family forest management for climate adaptation include the lack of more robust markets for a wide range of forest products, a higher capacity forestry workforce, education and assistance in planning forest management, and addressing the issue of increased parcelization of family forest lands. We situate these perceptions in conversations on the role of boundary organizations in climate adaptation, how individual adaptation occurs, and how governing methods frame adaptation possibilities.more » « less
-
Abstract Monarch butterflies have experienced massive population declines and have been proposed to be listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Milkweeds (Asclepiasspp.) are the sole host plant for monarch larvae, and milkweed abundance has dramatically declined in the past 25 years due to increased usage of herbicides and the spread of row crop agriculture that covers 21% of the continental United States. Given the importance of milkweeds to monarch larvae, there has been a major conservation effort to increase milkweed abundance. However, conservation efforts have largely ignored rangeland because of the incorrect assumption that grazers do not consume milkweeds and that milkweed abundance may be near maximum in rangeland. This is an important conservation blind spot because rangeland covers 34% of the continental United States. In 2023, we compared milkweed and juvenile monarch abundance (eggs + larvae) between ungrazed, cattle‐grazed, and bison‐grazed grassland units at six sites in Nebraska, Iowa, Missouri, and Kansas, United States. The sites are owned by conservation organizations and grazed with moderate intensity. Ungrazed and bison‐grazed grassland units did not significantly differ in milkweed abundance, but they had 5.4× more milkweeds than cattle‐grazed grassland units. We found juvenile monarch abundance did not significantly differ between bison‐ and cattle‐grazed grassland units, but that juvenile monarch abundance was 6.4× higher in ungrazed grassland units. We conclude that rangeland grazed by cattle and bison can support more than the current level of juvenile monarchs. Although grazing reduced juvenile monarch abundance, continued grazing is important for monarch conservation because rangeland that is not grazed in this study region is typically converted to row crop agriculture or invaded by eastern redcedar and other trees. We also discuss changes to grazing timing that could increase milkweed and monarch abundance.more » « less
-
Albrich, Katharina (Ed.)Abstract Forest productivity is a key determinant of timberland financial returns. To increase timber production, landowners and forest managers often have to decide on fertilization levels early in a plantation’s establishment. However, the biological response to fertilization is uncertain and does not guarantee increased productivity. In this study, we developed a stochastic harvest scheduling model at the forest level to account for these uncertainties. Using inventory plots and fertilization trial data across the Southeastern US, we constructed a two-stage stochastic programming model using timber production as the terminal stage. Our findings highlight the need to consider evolving market dynamics, including land conversion, in forest management decisions. Future research should explore multi-stage stochastic programming, site-specific silviculture, and financial factors like timber price volatility to refine growth and yield predictions. By extending the application of stochastic optimization, this study provides forest managers with a more nuanced understanding of silvicultural risks and uncertainties, helping them make informed decisions that balance economic returns with ecological sustainability.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118225
