skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: The interplay between hydrogen and halogen bonding: substituent effects and their role in the hydrogen bond enhanced halogen bond
The hydrogen bond enhanced halogen bond can be modulated by changing substituents on the HB or XB donor ring. Thus, distant substituents can impact nearby noncovalent interactions and this can be used as a viable approach for molecular design.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2004213
PAR ID:
10494572
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Royal Society of Chemistry
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Chemical Science
Volume:
14
Issue:
33
ISSN:
2041-6520
Page Range / eLocation ID:
8924 to 8935
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
Anion binding substituent effects halogen bonding hydrogen bonding hydrogen bond enhanced halogen bond.
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract The effects on the C−I⋅⋅N halogen bond between iodobenzene and NH3of placing various substituents on the phenyl ring are monitored by quantum calculations. Substituents R=N(CH3)2, NH2, CH3, OCH3, COCH3, Cl, F, COH, CN, and NO2were each placed ortho, meta, and para to the I. The depth of the σ‐hole on I is deepened as R becomes more electron‐withdrawing which is reflected in a strengthening of the halogen bond, which varied between 3.3 and 5.5 kcal mol−1. In most cases, the ortho placement yields the largest perturbation, followed by meta and then para, but this trend is not universal. Parallel to these substituent effects is a progressive lengthening of the covalent C−I bond. Formation of the halogen bond reduces the NMR chemical shielding of all three nuclei directly involved in the C−I⋅⋅N interaction. The deshielding of the electron donor N is most closely correlated with the strength of the bond, as is the coupling constant between I and N, so both have potential use as spectroscopic measures of halogen bond strength. 
    more » « less
  2. It is usually expected that formation of a halogen bond (XB) requires that a region of positive electrostatic potential associated with a σ or π-hole on the Lewis acid will interact with the negative potential of the base, either a lone pair or π-bond region. Quantum calculations of model systems suggest this not to be necessary. The placement of electron-withdrawing substituents on the base can reverse the sign of the potential in its lone pair or π-bond region to positive, and this base can nonetheless engage in a XB with the positive σ-hole of a Lewis acid. The reverse scenario is also possible in certain circumstances, as a negatively charged σ-hole can form a XB with the negative lone pair region of a base. Despite these classical Coulombic repulsions, the overall electrostatic interaction is attractive in these XBs, albeit only weakly so. The strengths of these bonds are surprisingly insensitive to changes in the partner molecule. For example, even a wide range in the depth of the σ-hole of the approaching acid yields only a minimal change in the strength of the XB to a base with a positive potential. 
    more » « less
  3. C–H hydrogen bonds to iodine halogen bond donors are shown to improve halogen bonding and molecular preorganization. 
    more » « less
  4. The halogen bond formed by a series of Lewis acids TF 3 X (T = C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb; X = Cl, Br, I) with NH 3 is studied by quantum chemical calculations. The interaction energy is closely mimicked by the depth of the σ-hole on the X atom as well as the full electrostatic energy. There is a first trend by which the hole is deepened if the T atom to which X is attached becomes more electron-withdrawing: C > Si > Ge > Sn > Pb. On the other hand, larger more polarizable T atoms are better able to transmit the electron-withdrawing power of the F substituents. The combination of these two opposing factors leaves PbF 3 X forming the strongest XBs, followed by CF 3 X, with SiF 3 X engaging in the weakest bonds. The charge transfer from the NH 3 lone pair into the σ*(TX) antibonding orbital tends to elongate the covalent TX bond, and this force is largest for the heavier X and T atoms. On the other hand, the contraction of this bond deepens the σ-hole at the X atom, which would enhance both the electrostatic component and the full interaction energy. This bond-shortening effect is greatest for the lighter X atoms. The combination of these two opposing forces leaves the T–X bond contracting for X = Cl and Br, but lengthening for I. 
    more » « less
  5. null (Ed.)
    A charge neutral iodoethynyl-based multidentate halogen-bond donor was synthesized and successfully utilized as an organocatalyst in a benchmark Ritter-type solvolysis reaction. The catalytic activity was monitored using 1 H NMR spectroscopy and several control experiments were systematically carried out in order to rule out hidden catalysis based on other functional groups. 
    more » « less