An official website of the United States government
What You Will Learn in This Chapter In this chapter, instructors will develop foundational knowledge about how to select and use computational tools to teach CRISPR-Cas technologies. Broadly speaking, CRISPR-Cas is a sequence-based technology. Computational resources provide a platform for managing and interacting with these sequences. With appropriate instructional design, computational tools are a valuable complement to lessons about CRISPR-Cas technologies and are essential support tools for CRISPR-Cas experiments. With an ever-growing suite of computational tools available, in this chapter, instructors will learn to navigate the landscape of these tools to select the most appropriate tools for their classroom or laboratory needs. Instructors will learn to identify when computational resources are appropriate for use in their classroom (and when they are not appropriate), then how to select the most appropriate tools for their unique needs. Additionally, we introduce instructors to best practices in instructional design for using CRISPR-Cas computational tools in the classroom. Throughout, instructors will learn both the rationale and principle behind selection so they can evaluate tools discussed in this chapter and new ones as they become available.
more »
« less
Design thinking and agile design: New trends or just good design?
While most instructional design courses and much of the instructional design industry focus on ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation,Evaluation), approaches such as design thinking, human-centered design, and agile methods like SAM (Successive Approximation Model), have drawn attention.This chapter unpacks what we know about design thinking and presents a concise history of design thinking to situate it within the broader design research fi eld. Itthen traces its emergence in other fi elds. The chapter considers lessons for instructional designers and concludes by setting an agenda to address issues forscholarship, teaching, and practice.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1751369
- PAR ID:
- 10495173
- Publisher / Repository:
- edtechbooks
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Foundations of learning and instructional design technology (2nd Ed.)
- ISSN:
- 0000-0000
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Reform efforts targeting science instruction emphasize that students should develop scientific proficiency that empowers them to collaboratively negotiate science ideas as they develop meaningful understandings about science phenomena through science practices. The lessons teachers design and enact play a critical role in engaging students in rigorous science learning. Collaborative design, in which teachers work together to design, enact, and reflect on their teaching, holds potential to support teachers’ learning, but scarce research examines the pathways by which collaborative design can influence teachers’ instructional practices. Examining the teaching and reflective thinking of two science teachers who engaged in collaborative design activities over two years, we found that their enactment practices became more supportive of students’ rigorous learning over time, and that they perceived collaborative efforts with teacher educators and partner teachers to plan lessons and analyze videos of instruction as supportive of their learning to enact rigorous instruction.more » « less
-
Design thinking is a robust framework for creatively and effectively identifying and solving important human problems. While design thinking is commonly associated with fields like industrial design, it can be applied to many problem types. For example, several recent examples demonstrate the applicability of design thinking to the design and development of educational materials, courses, and systems. These results suggest that design thinking could be used as a framework to (re)design and develop effective engineering courses. The goal of this project is to understand how nine educators from different backgrounds did or did not use design thinking to redesign a sophomore-level electrical and computer engineering course. The primary source of data was 21 transcribed audio recordings of design meetings and is supplemented with interviews, reflections, and course artifacts. Thematic analysis revealed 10 themes that represent connections and disconnections between the process used and a common five-stage design thinking process (empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test). These themes demonstrate some of the opportunities and challenges related to design thinking within an engineering course design setting. In particular, they suggest that engineering course design is a relevant context for design thinking, but one to which design thinking methods do not always naturally translated. Future work should focus on better understanding unique applications of design thinking within engineering course design and methods that might to support more designerly behaviors among engineering educators.more » « less
-
In this article, we present a set of design principles to guide the development of instructional materials aimed to support preservice secondary mathematics teachers (PSMTs) examining student practices in technology-mediated environments. To develop design principles, we drew on the literature related to technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK; Niess, 2005), video cases as learning objects (Sherin & van Es, 2005), and professional noticing (Jacobs, et al., 2010). After presenting the design principles, we share a task created using these design principles. Finally, we share PSMTs’ refections about changes in their own understanding after examining students’ practices. Their responses provide insights into the usefulness of the design principles for deepening PSMTs’ mathematical knowledge and knowledge of students’ understanding, thinking, and learning with technology.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract This paper proposes a relationship between design thinking and computational thinking. It describes design thinking and computational thinking as two prominent ways of understanding how people address design problems. It suggests that, currently, each of design thinking and computational thinking is defined and theorized in isolation from the other. A two-dimensional ontological space of the ways that people think in addressing problems is proposed, based on the orientation of the thinker towards problem and solution generality/specificity. Placement of design thinking and computational thinking within this space and discussion of their relationship leads to the suggestion of a dual process model for addressing design problems. It suggests that, in this model, design thinking and computational thinking are processes that are ontological mirror images of each other, and are the two processes by which thinkers address problems. Thinkers can move fluently between the two. The paper makes a contribution towards the theoretical foundations of design thinking and proposes questions about how design thinking and computational thinking might be both investigated and taught as constituent parts of a dual process.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- The DOI is not currently available.
