An official website of the United States government
Monitoring diseases within tree canopies is challenging due to their inaccessibility and the complexity of canopy ecosystems. Here, we explore the potential of stemflow sampling as a novel, ground-based method for detecting and monitoring canopy-associated pathogens. In a case study focused on Litylenchus crenatae ssp. mccannii (LCM), the nematode associated with Beech Leaf Disease (BLD), we collected stemflow samples from 18 Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American beech) trees across 12 storm events. eDNA assays detected LCM presence in 7 of those storms, with quantitative PCR-derived gene concentrations ranging from 80 to 158,000 copies mL−1. Higher detections and concentrations coincided with leaf senescence and bud formation periods, and they correlated conditionally with event rainfall amount and pre-storm changes in relative humidity. Although based on a single site and season, these findings demonstrate the potential for stemflow sampling to capture a pathogen’s eDNA (i.e., canopy distress signals) at ground level. This method could complement traditional monitoring, offering another affordable, non-invasive tool for pathogen detection. Additional validation, particularly regarding live versus dead organisms and across varied site conditions, will be essential to evaluate the breadth of value stemflow eDNA offers for canopy disease management and ecological research.
more »
« less
Three Fundamental Challenges to the Advancement of Stemflow Research and Its Integration into Natural Science
Plant canopies divert a portion of precipitation to the base of their stems through “stemflow”, a phenomenon that influences the canopy water balance, soil microbial ecology, and intrasystem nutrient cycling. However, a comprehensive integration of stemflow into theoretical and numerical models in natural science remains limited. This perspective examines three unresolved, fundamental questions hindering this integration, spanning the canopy to the soil. First, the precise source area within the canopy that generates stemflow is undefined. Thus, we asked, “whence stemflow?” Current common assumptions equate it to the entire tree canopy, a potentially misleading simplification that could affect our interpretation of stemflow variability. Second, we asked what are the various conditions contributing to stemflow generation—beyond rain, to dew and intercepted ice melt—and could the exclusion of these volumes consequently obscure an understanding of the broader implications of stemflow? Third, we explored ”whither stemflow?” This question extends beyond how much stemflow infiltrates where, into what uptakes it and from where. Addressing these questions is constrained by current observational and analytical methods. Nevertheless, by confronting these challenges, the stemflow research community stands to make significant strides in comprehending this unique hydrological component and situating it within the broader context of natural science.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10498661
- Publisher / Repository:
- Water
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Water
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2073-4441
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 117
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
As watersheds are complex systems that are difficult to directly study, the streams that drain them are often sampled to search for watershed “signals.” These signals include the presence and/or abundance of isotopes, types of sediment, organisms (including pathogens), chemical compounds associated with ephemeral biogeochemical processes or anthropogenic impacts, and so on. Just like watersheds can send signals via the streams that drain from them, we present a conceptual analysis that suggests plant canopies (equally complex and hard-to-study systems) may send similar signals via the precipitation that drains down their stems (stemflow). For large, tall, hard-to-access tree canopies, this portion of precipitation may be modest, often <2%; however, stemflow waters, like stream waters, scour a large drainage network which may allow stemflow to pick up various signals from various processes within and surrounding canopies. This paper discusses some of the signals that the canopy environment may impart to stemflow and their relevance to our understanding of vegetated ecosystems. Being a conceptual analysis, some examples have been observed; most are hypothetical. These include signals from on-canopy biogeochemical processes, seasonal epi-faunal activities, pathogenic impacts, and the physiological activities of the canopy itself. Given stemflow's currently limited empirical hydrological, ecological and biogeochemical relevance to date (mostly due to its modest fraction in most forest water cycles), future work on the possible “signals in stemflow” may also motivate more natural scientists and, perhaps some applied researchers, to rigorously monitor this oft-ignored water flux.more » « less
-
Precipitation channelled down tree stems (stemflow) or into drip points of ‘throughfall’ beneath trees results in spatially concentrated inputs of water and chemicals to the ground. Currently, these flows are poorly characterised due to uncertainties about which branches redirect rainfall to stemflow or throughfall drip points.We introduce a graph theoretic algorithm that ‘prunes’ quantitative structural models of trees (derived from terrestrial LiDAR) to identify branches contributing to stemflow and those contributing to throughfall drip points. To demonstrate the method's utility, we analysed two trees with similar canopy sizes but contrasting canopy architecture and rainfall partitioning behaviours.For both trees, the branch ‘watershed’ area contributing to stemflow (under conditions assumed to represent moderate precipitation intensity) was found to be only half of the total ground area covered by the canopy. The study also revealed significant variations between trees in the number and median contribution areas of modelled throughfall drip points (69 vs. 94 drip points tree−1, with contributing projected areas of 28.6 vs. 7.8 m2tree−1, respectively). Branch diameter, surface area, volumes and woody area index of components contributing to stemflow and throughfall drip points may play a role in the trees' differing rainfall partitioning behaviours.Our pruning algorithm, enabled by the proliferation of LiDAR observations of canopy structure, promises to enhance studies of canopy hydrology. It offers a novel approach to refine our understanding of how trees interact with rainfall, thereby broadening the utility of existing LiDAR data in environmental research.more » « less
-
The Table S1-S6 are curated breakout notes from the NSF-funded FUTURE 2024 Workshop (March 26-28, 2024). During the workshop, the first day of discussions focused on “Critical science questions that require seafloor sampling,” where participants: (I) defined the important sample types/sampling environment of their research; (II) assessed how well this seafloor environment is currently sampled; (III) reviewed how sample repositories/databases are currently used; and, (IV) evaluated justifications for acquiring new samples. Each breakout session culminated with a discussion of (V) what important science questions could be addressed soon (5–10 years), with existing or forthcoming assets and technologies, versus (VI) what might take longer (10+ years) and/or require the development of new assets or technologies. These motivating topics fed into the second day of discussions, which focused on “Aligning seafloor sampling technology with critical science questions.” Groups were guided by a common set of prompts, including what current resources were essential to the participants’ research, and what were the greatest challenges they faced in recovering the materials needed. The participants also discussed whether they could acquire the materials needed to address their science questions given current US assets (Figure 1 in FUTURE 2024 PI-team, 2024, AGU Advances 2024AV001560), how sample repositories and databases could be optimized for science needs, and the justification for acquiring or developing new technologies.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Soil science is one of the least diverse subdisciplines within the agricultural, earth, and natural sciences. Representation within soil science does not currently reflect demographic trends in the U.S. We synthesize available data on the representation of historically marginalized groups in soil science in the U.S. and identify historical mechanisms contributing to these trends. We review education and employment information within academic and the federal government, land-grant university participation, and available Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) membership data to gain insight into the current state of representation within soil sciences and implications for the future of this discipline. Across all domains of diversity, historically marginalized groups are underrepresented in soil science. We provide recommendations toward recognizing diversity within the field, improving and encouraging diversity within the SSSA, and suggested responses for both individuals and institutions toward improving diversity, equity, and inclusion.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/w16010117
