Let
We give an algebraic criterion for the existence of projectively Hermitian–Yang–Mills metrics on a holomorphic vector bundle
 NSFPAR ID:
 10501248
 Publisher / Repository:
 Springer Science + Business Media
 Date Published:
 Journal Name:
 Mathematische Annalen
 ISSN:
 00255831
 Format(s):
 Medium: X
 Sponsoring Org:
 National Science Foundation
More Like this

Abstract be an elliptically fibered$$X\rightarrow {{\mathbb {P}}}^1$$ $X\to {P}^{1}$K 3 surface, admitting a sequence of Ricciflat metrics collapsing the fibers. Let$$\omega _{i}$$ ${\omega}_{i}$V be a holomorphicSU (n ) bundle overX , stable with respect to . Given the corresponding sequence$$\omega _i$$ ${\omega}_{i}$ of Hermitian–Yang–Mills connections on$$\Xi _i$$ ${\Xi}_{i}$V , we prove that, ifE is a generic fiber, the restricted sequence converges to a flat connection$$\Xi _i_{E}$$ ${\Xi}_{i}{}_{E}$ . Furthermore, if the restriction$$A_0$$ ${A}_{0}$ is of the form$$V_E$$ ${V}_{E}$ for$$\oplus _{j=1}^n{\mathcal {O}}_E(q_j0)$$ ${\oplus}_{j=1}^{n}{O}_{E}({q}_{j}0)$n distinct points , then these points uniquely determine$$q_j\in E$$ ${q}_{j}\in E$ .$$A_0$$ ${A}_{0}$ 
Abstract In nuclear collisions at RHIC energies, an excess of
hyperons over$$\Omega$$ $\Omega $ is observed, indicating that$$\bar{\Omega }$$ $\overline{\Omega}$ has a net baryon number despite$$\Omega$$ $\Omega $s and quarks being produced in pairs. The baryon number in$$\bar{s}$$ $\overline{s}$ may have been transported from the incident nuclei and/or produced in the baryonpair production of$$\Omega$$ $\Omega $ with other types of antihyperons such as$$\Omega$$ $\Omega $ . To investigate these two scenarios, we propose to measure the correlations between$$\bar{\Xi }$$ $\overline{\Xi}$ and$$\Omega$$ $\Omega $K and between and antihyperons. We use two versions, the default and stringmelting, of a multiphase transport (AMPT) model to illustrate the method for measuring the correlation and to demonstrate the general shape of the correlation. We present the$$\Omega$$ $\Omega $ hadron correlations from simulated Au+Au collisions at$$\Omega$$ $\Omega $ and$$\sqrt{s_\text{NN}} = 7.7$$ $\sqrt{{s}_{\text{NN}}}=7.7$ and discuss the dependence on the collision energy and on the hadronization scheme in these two AMPT versions. These correlations can be used to explore the mechanism of baryon number transport and the effects of baryon number and strangeness conservation on nuclear collisions.$$14.6 \ \textrm{GeV}$$ $14.6\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}\text{GeV}$ 
Abstract A graph
G isH free if it has no induced subgraph isomorphic toH . We prove that a free graph with clique number$$P_5$$ ${P}_{5}$ has chromatic number at most$$\omega \ge 3$$ $\omega \ge 3$ . The best previous result was an exponential upper bound$$\omega ^{\log _2(\omega )}$$ ${\omega}^{{log}_{2}\left(\omega \right)}$ , due to Esperet, Lemoine, Maffray, and Morel. A polynomial bound would imply that the celebrated ErdősHajnal conjecture holds for$$(5/27)3^{\omega }$$ $(5/27){3}^{\omega}$ , which is the smallest open case. Thus, there is great interest in whether there is a polynomial bound for$$P_5$$ ${P}_{5}$ free graphs, and our result is an attempt to approach that.$$P_5$$ ${P}_{5}$ 
Abstract Given a compact doubling metric measure space
X that supports a 2Poincaré inequality, we construct a Dirichlet form on that is comparable to the upper gradient energy form on$$N^{1,2}(X)$$ ${N}^{1,2}\left(X\right)$ . Our approach is based on the approximation of$$N^{1,2}(X)$$ ${N}^{1,2}\left(X\right)$X by a family of graphs that is doubling and supports a 2Poincaré inequality (see [20]). We construct a bilinear form on using the Dirichlet form on the graph. We show that the$$N^{1,2}(X)$$ ${N}^{1,2}\left(X\right)$ limit$$\Gamma $$ $\Gamma $ of this family of bilinear forms (by taking a subsequence) exists and that$$\mathcal {E}$$ $E$ is a Dirichlet form on$$\mathcal {E}$$ $E$X . Properties of are established. Moreover, we prove that$$\mathcal {E}$$ $E$ has the property of matching boundary values on a domain$$\mathcal {E}$$ $E$ . This construction makes it possible to approximate harmonic functions (with respect to the Dirichlet form$$\Omega \subseteq X$$ $\Omega \subseteq X$ ) on a domain in$$\mathcal {E}$$ $E$X with a prescribed Lipschitz boundary data via a numerical scheme dictated by the approximating Dirichlet forms, which are discrete objects. 
Abstract It has been recently established in David and Mayboroda (Approximation of green functions and domains with uniformly rectifiable boundaries of all dimensions.
arXiv:2010.09793 ) that on uniformly rectifiable sets the Green function is almost affine in the weak sense, and moreover, in some scenarios such Green function estimates are equivalent to the uniform rectifiability of a set. The present paper tackles a strong analogue of these results, starting with the “flagship degenerate operators on sets with lower dimensional boundaries. We consider the elliptic operators associated to a domain$$L_{\beta ,\gamma } = {\text {div}}D^{d+1+\gamma n} \nabla $$ ${L}_{\beta ,\gamma}=\text{div}{D}^{d+1+\gamma n}\nabla $ with a uniformly rectifiable boundary$$\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^n$$ $\Omega \subset {R}^{n}$ of dimension$$\Gamma $$ $\Gamma $ , the now usual distance to the boundary$$d < n1$$ $d<n1$ given by$$D = D_\beta $$ $D={D}_{\beta}$ for$$D_\beta (X)^{\beta } = \int _{\Gamma } Xy^{d\beta } d\sigma (y)$$ ${D}_{\beta}{\left(X\right)}^{\beta}={\int}_{\Gamma}{Xy}^{d\beta}d\sigma \left(y\right)$ , where$$X \in \Omega $$ $X\in \Omega $ and$$\beta >0$$ $\beta >0$ . In this paper we show that the Green function$$\gamma \in (1,1)$$ $\gamma \in (1,1)$G for , with pole at infinity, is well approximated by multiples of$$L_{\beta ,\gamma }$$ ${L}_{\beta ,\gamma}$ , in the sense that the function$$D^{1\gamma }$$ ${D}^{1\gamma}$ satisfies a Carleson measure estimate on$$\big  D\nabla \big (\ln \big ( \frac{G}{D^{1\gamma }} \big )\big )\big ^2$$ $D\nabla (ln(\frac{G}{{D}^{1\gamma}})){}^{2}$ . We underline that the strong and the weak results are different in nature and, of course, at the level of the proofs: the latter extensively used compactness arguments, while the present paper relies on some intricate integration by parts and the properties of the “magical distance function from David et al. (Duke Math J, to appear).$$\Omega $$ $\Omega $