An official website of the United States government
Abstract The inverse temperature layer (ITL) beneath water‐atmosphere interface within which temperature increases with depth has been observed from measurement of water temperature profile at an inland lake. Strong solar radiation combined with moderate wind‐driven near‐surface turbulence leads to the formation of a pronounced diurnal cycle of the ITL predicted by a physical heat transfer model. The ITL only forms during daytime when solar radiation intensity exceeds a threshold while consistently occurs during nighttime. The largest depth of the ITL is comparable to thee‐fold penetration depth of solar radiation during daytime and at least one order of magnitude deeper during nighttime. The dynamics of the ITL depth variation simulated by a physical model forced by observed water surface solar radiation and temperature is confirmed by the observed water temperature profile in the lake.
more »
« less
An Observational and Modeling Study of Inverse‐Temperature Layer and Water Surface Heat Flux
An “inverse-temperature layer” (ITL) of water temperature increasing with depth is predicted based on physical principles and confirmed by in situ observations. Water temperature and other meteorological data were collected from a fixed platform in the middle of a shallow inland lake. The ITL persists year-around with its depth on the order of one m varying diurnally and seasonally and shallower during daytimes than nighttimes. Water surface heat flux derived from the ITL temperature distribution follows the diurnal cycle of solar radiation up to 300 W m −2 during daytime and down to 50 W m −2 during nighttime. Solar radiation attenuation in water strongly influences the ITL dynamics and water surface heat flux. Water surface heat flux simulated by two non-gradient models independent of temperature gradient, wind speed and surface roughness using the data of surface temperature and solar radiation is in close agreement with the ITL based estimates.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10504852
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 16
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract. For the radiative impact of individual climate forcings,most previous studies focused on the global mean values at the top of theatmosphere (TOA), and less attention has been paid to surface processes,especially for black carbon (BC) aerosols. In this study, the surface radiativeresponses to five different forcing agents were analyzed by using idealizedmodel simulations. Our analyses reveal that for greenhouse gases, solarirradiance, and scattering aerosols, the surface temperature changes aremainly dictated by the changes of surface radiative heating, but for BC,surface energy redistribution between different components plays a morecrucial role. Globally, when a unit BC forcing is imposed at TOA, the netshortwave radiation at the surface decreases by -5.87±0.67 W m−2 (W m−2)−1 (averaged over global land without Antarctica), which ispartially offset by increased downward longwave radiation (2.32±0.38 W m−2 (W m−2)−1 from the warmer atmosphere, causing a netdecrease in the incoming downward surface radiation of -3.56±0.60 W m−2 (W m−2)−1. Despite a reduction in the downward radiationenergy, the surface air temperature still increases by 0.25±0.08 Kbecause of less efficient energy dissipation, manifested by reduced surfacesensible (-2.88±0.43 W m−2 (W m−2)−1) and latent heat flux(-1.54±0.27 W m−2 (W m−2)−1), as well as a decrease inBowen ratio (-0.20±0.07 (W m−2)−1). Such reductions of turbulentfluxes can be largely explained by enhanced air stability (0.07±0.02 K (W m−2)−1), measured as the difference of the potential temperaturebetween 925 hPa and surface, and reduced surface wind speed (-0.05±0.01 m s−1 (W m−2)−1). The enhanced stability is due to the fasteratmospheric warming relative to the surface, whereas the reduced wind speedcan be partially explained by enhanced stability and reduced Equator-to-poleatmospheric temperature gradient. These rapid adjustments under BC forcingoccur in the lower atmosphere and propagate downward to influence thesurface energy redistribution and thus surface temperature response, whichis not observed under greenhouse gases or scattering aerosols. Our studyprovides new insights into the impact of absorbing aerosols on surfaceenergy balance and surface temperature response.more » « less
-
Abstract Vertical profiles of temperature microstructure at 95 stations were obtained over the Beaufort shelf and shelfbreak in the southern Canada Basin during a November 2018 research cruise. Two methods for estimating the dissipation rates of temperature variance and turbulent kinetic energy were compared using this data set. Both methods require fitting a theoretical spectrum to observed temperature gradient spectra, but differ in their assumptions. The two methods agree for calculations of the dissipation rate of temperature variance, but not for that of turbulent kinetic energy. After applying a rigorous data rejection framework, estimates of turbulent diffusivity and heat flux are made across different depth ranges. The turbulent diffusivity of temperature is typically enhanced by about one order of magnitude in profiles on the shelf compared to near the shelfbreak, and similarly near the shelfbreak compared to profiles with bottom depth >1,000 m. Depth bin means are shown to vary depending on the averaging method (geometric means tend to be smaller than arithmetic means and maximum likelihood estimates). The statistical distributions of heat flux within the surface, cold halocline, and Atlantic water layer change with depth. Heat fluxes are typically <1 Wm−2, but are greater than 50 Wm−2in ∼8% of the overall data. These largest fluxes are located almost exclusively within the surface layer, where temperature gradients can be large.more » « less
-
Measurements of turbulence, as rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy (ε), adjacent to the air-water interface are rare but essential for understanding of gas transfer velocities (k) used to compute fluxes of greenhouse gases. Variability in ε is expected over diel cycles of stratification and mixing. Monin-Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) predicts an enhancement in ε during heating (buoyancy flux, β+) relative to that for shear (u*w 3/κz where u*w is water friction velocity, κ is von Karman constant, z is depth). To verify and expand predictions, we quantified ε in the upper 0.25 m and below from profiles of temperature-gradient microstructure in combination with time series meteorology and temperature in a tropical reservoir for winds <4 m s−1. Maximum likelihood estimates of near-surface ε during heating were independent of wind speed and high, ∼5 × 10−6 m2 s−3, up to three orders of magnitude higher than predictions from u*w 3/κz, increased with heating, and were ∼10 times higher than during cooling. k, estimated using near-surface ε, was ∼10 cm hr−1, validated with k obtained from chamber measurements, and 2–5 times higher than computed from wind-based models. The flux Richardson number (Rf) varied from ∼0.4 to ∼0.001 with a median value of 0.04 in the upper 0.25 m, less than the critical value of 0.2. We extend MOST by incorporating the variability in Rf when scaling the influence of β+ relative to u*w 3/κz in estimates of ε, and by extension, k, obtained from time series meteorological and temperature data.more » « less
-
Abstract Clouds and radiation play an important role in warming events over the Southern Ocean (SO). Here we evaluate European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis version 5 (ERA5) and Polar Weather Research Forecast (PWRF) output through comparison to surface‐based measurements of clouds, radiation, and the atmospheric state over the SO during 2017–2023 at Escudero Station (62.2°S, 58.97°W) on King George Island. ERA5 mean monthly downward shortwave (DSW) radiative fluxes are found to be 38–50 W m−2higher than observations in summer, whereas ERA5 mean monthly downward longwave (DLW) is biased by −18 to −22 W m−2in summer and −16 W m−2on average over the year. Comparisons of temperature, humidity, and lowest‐cloud base heights between ERA5 and observations rule these factors out as large contributors to the DLW flux biases. The similarity between observed DLW cloud forcing distributions for atmospheric columns containing low‐level liquid and ice‐only clouds suggests limited influence of cloud phase errors on DLW biases. Thus the most likely explanation for DLW flux biases in ERA5 is underestimated cloud optical depth, which is also consistent with DSW flux biases. Similar biases in ERA5 are found during atmospheric river (AR) events. By contrast, PWRF flux bias magnitudes are much smaller during AR events (−12 W m−2for DSW and −2 W m−2for DLW). After bias correction, ERA5 monthly average net cloud forcing over 2017–2023 is found to be a minimum of −107 W m−2in January and a maximum of 65 W m−2in June.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104358
