An official website of the United States government
We present the Succinct Range Filter (SuRF), a fast and compact data structure for approximate membership tests. Unlike traditional Bloom filters, SuRF supports both single-key lookups and common range queries: open-range queries, closed-range queries, and range counts. SuRF is based on a new data structure called the Fast Succinct Trie (FST) that matches the point and range query performance of state-of-the-art order-preserving indexes, while consuming only 10 bits per trie node. The false positive rates in SuRF for both point and range queries are tunable to satisfy different application needs. We evaluate SuRF in RocksDB as a replacement for its Bloom filters to reduce I/O by filtering requests before they access on-disk data structures. Our experiments on a 100 GB dataset show that replacing RocksDB's Bloom filters with SuRFs speeds up open-seek (without upper-bound) and closed-seek (with upper-bound) queries by up to 1.5× and 5× with a modest cost on the worst-case (all-missing) point query throughput due to slightly higher false positive rate.
more »
« less
Modeling Average False Positive Rates of Recycling Bloom Filters
Bloom Filters are a space-efficient data structure used for the testing of membership in a set that errs only in the False Positive direction. However, the standard analysis that measures this False Positive rate provides a form of worst case bound that is both overly conservative for the majority of network applications that utilize Bloom Filters, and reduces accuracy by not taking into account the actual state (number of bits set) of the Bloom Filter after each arrival. In this paper, we more accurately characterize the False Positive dynamics of Bloom Filters as they are commonly used in networking applications. In particular, network applications often utilize a Bloom Filter that “recycles”: it repeatedly fills, and upon reaching a certain level of saturation, empties and fills again. In this context, it makes more sense to evaluate performance using the average False Positive rate instead of the worst case bound. We show how to efficiently compute the average False Positive rate of recycling Bloom Filter variants via renewal and Markov models. We apply our models to both the standard Bloom Filter and a “two-phase” variant, verify the accuracy of our model with simulations, and find that the previous analysis’ worst-case formulation leads to up to a 30% reduction in the efficiency of Bloom Filter when applied in network applications, while two-phase overhead diminishes as the needed False Positive rate is tightened.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10515165
- Publisher / Repository:
- IEEE
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- IEEE INFOCOM 2024 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Vancouver, Canada
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
A filter is adaptive if it achieves a false positive rate of " on each query independently of the answers to previous queries. Many popular filters such as Bloom filters are not adaptive—an adversary could repeat a false-positive query many times to drive the false-positive rate to 1. Bender et al. [4] formalized the definition of adaptivity and gave a provably adaptive filter, the broom filter. Mitzenmacher et al. [20] gave a filter that achieves a lower empirical false- positive rate by exploiting repetitions. We prove that an adaptive filter has a lower false- positive rate when the adversary is stochastic. Specifically, we analyze the broom filter against queries drawn from a Zipfian distribution. We validate our analysis empirically by showing that the broom filter achieves a low false-positive rate on both network traces and synthetic datasets, even when compared to a regular filter augmented with a cache for storing frequently queried items.more » « less
-
Bloom Filters are a desirable data structure for distinguishing new values in sequences of data (i.e., messages), due to their space efficiency, their low false positive rates (incorrectly classifying a new value as a repeat), and never producing false negatives (classifying a repeat value as new). However, as the Bloom Filter's bits are filled, false positive rates creep upward. To keep false positive rates below a reasonable threshold, applications periodically "recycle" the Bloom Filter, clearing the memory and then resuming the tracking of data. After a recycle point, subsequent arrivals of recycled messages are likely to be misclassified as new; recycling induces false negatives. Despite numerous applications of recycling, the corresponding false negative rates have never been analyzed. In this paper, we derive approximations, upper bounds, and lower bounds of false negative rates for several variants of recycling Bloom Filters. These approximations and bounds are functions of the size of memory used to store the Bloom Filter and the distributions on new arrivals and repeat messages, and can be efficiently computed on conventional hardware. We show, via comparison to simulation, that our upper bounds and approximations are extremely tight, and can be efficiently computed for megabyte-sized Bloom Filters on conventional hardware.more » « less
-
Filters trade off accuracy for space and occasionally return false positive matches with a bounded error. Numerous systems use filters in fast memory to avoid performing expensive I/Os to slow storage. A fundamental limitation in traditional filters is that they do not change their representation upon seeing a false positive match. Therefore, the maximum false positive rate is only guaranteed for a single query, not for an arbitrary set of queries. We can improve the filter's performance on a stream of queries, especially on a skewed distribution, if we can adapt after encountering false positives. Adaptive filters, such as telescoping quotient filters and adaptive cuckoo filters, update their representation upon detecting a false positive to avoid repeating the same error in the future. Adaptive filters require an auxiliary structure, typically much larger than the main filter and often residing on slow storage, to facilitate adaptation. However, existing adaptive filters are not practical and have not been adopted in real-world systems for two main reasons. First, they offer weak adaptivity guarantees, meaning that fixing a new false positive can cause a previously fixed false positive to come back. Secondly, the sub-optimal design of the auxiliary structure results in adaptivity overheads so substantial that they can actually diminish overall system performance compared to a traditional filter. In this paper, we design and implement the \sysname, the first practical adaptive filter with minimal adaptivity overhead and strong adaptivity guarantees, which means that the performance and false-positive guarantees continue to hold even for adversarial workloads. The \sysname is based on the state-of-the-art quotient filter design and preserves all the critical features of the quotient filter such as cache efficiency and mergeability. Furthermore, we employ a new auxiliary structure design which results in considerably low adaptivity overhead and makes the \sysname practical in real systems. We evaluate the \sysname by using it to filter queries to an on-disk B-tree database and find no negative impact on insert or query performance compared to traditional filters. Against adversarial workloads, the \sysname preserves system performance, whereas traditional filters incur 2× slowdown from adversaries representing as low as 1% of the workload. Finally, we show that on skewed query workloads, the \sysname can reduce the false-positive rate 100× using negligible (1/1000th of a bit per item) space overhead.more » « less
-
In this paper, we present our GPU implementation of the quotient filter, a compact data structure designed to implement approximate membership queries. The quotient filter is similar to the more well-known Bloom filter; however, in addition to set insertion and membership queries, the quotient filter also supports deletions and merging filters without requiring rehashing of the data set. Furthermore, the quotient filter can be extended to include counters without increasing the memory footprint. This paper describes our GPU implementation of two types of quotient filters: the standard quotient filter and the rank-and-select-based quotient filter. We describe the parallelization of all filter operations, including a comparison of the four different methods we devised for parallelizing quotient filter construction. In solving this problem, we found that we needed an operation similar to a parallel scan, but for non-associative operators. One outcome of this work is a variety of methods for computing parallel scan-type operations on a non-associative operator. For membership queries, we achieve a throughput of up to 1.13 billion items/second for the rank-and-select-based quotient filter: a speedup of 3x over the BloomGPU filter. Our fastest filter build method achieves a speedup of 2.1-3.1x over BloomGPU, with a peak throughput of 621 million items/second, and a rate of 516 million items/second for a 70% full filter. However, we find that our filters do not perform incremental updates as fast as the BloomGPU filter. For a batch of 2 million items, we perform incremental inserts at a rate of 81 million items/second - a 2.5x slowdown compared to BloomGPU's throughput of 201 million items/second. The quotient filter's memory footprint is comparable to that of a Bloom filter.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
