How Can Platforms Learn to Make Persuasive Recommendations? Many online platforms make recommendations to users on content from creators or products from sellers. The motivation underlying such recommendations is to persuade users into taking actions that also serve system-wide goals. To do this effectively, a platform needs to know the underlying distribution of payoff-relevant variables (such as content or product quality). However, this distributional information is often lacking—for example, when new content creators or sellers join a platform. In “Learning to Persuade on the Fly: Robustness Against Ignorance,” Zu, Iyer, and Xu study how a platform can make persuasive recommendations over time in the absence of distributional knowledge using a learning-based approach. They first propose and motivate a robust-persuasiveness criterion for settings with incomplete information. They then design an efficient recommendation algorithm that satisfies this criterion and achieves low regret compared with the benchmark of complete distributional knowledge. Overall, by relaxing the strong assumption of complete distributional knowledge, this research extends the applicability of information design to more practical settings.
more »
« less
Ignorance of the Rules of Omission: An Essay on Privilege Law Ignorance of the Rules of Omission: An Essay on Privilege Law
- Award ID(s):
- 2243822
- PAR ID:
- 10516364
- Publisher / Repository:
- Vanderbilt Law Review Vanderbilt Law Review
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Vanderbilt law review
- ISSN:
- 0042-2533
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
As an important step in the development of browser-based writing-to-learn software that provides immediate structural feedback, we seek ways to improve the quality of students essays and to optimize the software analysis algorithm. This quasi-experimental investigation compares the quality of students’ summary writing under three writing prompt conditions, otherwise identical prompts add either 0, 14, or 26 key terms. Results show that key terms matters substantially – the summary essays of those given the prompt without key terms had longer essays and the resulting networks of those essays were more like the expert referent and like their peers’ essays. Although tentative, these results indicate that writing prompts should NOT include key terms.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

