More Like this

1. Adaptive Thermal Management of Implantable Device

   https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2879427  

   Chai, Ruizhi; Zhang, Ying (February 2019, IEEE Sensors Journal)
2. Who's In Control? On Security Risks of Disjointed IoT Device Management Channels

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3460120.3484592  

   Jia, Yan; Yuan, Bin; Xing, Luyi; Zhao, Dongfang; Zhang, Yifan; Wang, XiaoFeng; Liu, Yijing; Zheng, Kaimin; Crnjak, Peyton; Zhang, Yuqing; et al (November 2021, Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security)
3. Reinforcement Learning Environment for 5G-Enabled IoT Device Resource Management

   https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCE67514.2025.11258050  

   Sherlock, Logan; Shahid, Rahma; Balyan, Renu (August 2025, IEEE)

   This research project aims to develop a resource management framework for efficient allocation of 5G network resources to IoT (Internet of Things) devices. As 5G technology is increasingly integrated with IoT applications, the diverse demands and use-cases of IoT devices necessitate dynamic resource management. The focus of this study is to develop an IoT device environment utilizing reinforcement learning (RL) for resource adjustment. The environment observes IoT device parameters including the current BER (bit-error-rate), allocated bandwidth, and current signal power levels. Actions that can be taken by the RL agent on the environment include adjustments to the bandwidth and the signal power level of an IoT device. One implementation of the environment is currently tested with PPO (Proximal Policy Optimization), and DDPG (Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient) RL algorithms using a continuous action space. Initial results show that PPO models train at a faster rate, while DDPG models explore a wider range of states, leading to better model predictions. Another version is tested with PPO and DQN (Deep Q-Networks) using a discrete action space. DQN demonstrates slightly better results than the PPO, possibly due to its value-based approach and that it is better suited for discrete action spaces. 

   more » « less
4. Responsible data management

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3488717  

   Stoyanovich, Julia; Abiteboul, Serge; Howe, Bill; Jagadish, H. V.; Schelter, Sebastian (June 2022, Communications of the ACM)

   Perspectives on the role and responsibility of the data-management research community in designing, developing, using, and overseeing automated decision systems. 

   more » « less
5. Responsible Data Management

   https://doi.org/10.14778/3415478.3415570  

   Stoyanovich, Julia; Howe, Bill; Jagadish, H.V. (August 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment)

   The need for responsible data management intensifies with the growing impact of data on society. One central locus of the societal impact of data are Automated Decision Systems (ADS), socio-legal-technical systems that are used broadly in industry, non-pro fits, and government. ADS process data about people, help make decisions that are consequential to people's lives, are designed with the stated goals of improving efficiency and promoting equitable access to opportunity, involve a combination of human and automated decision making, and are subject to auditing for legal compliance and to public disclosure. They may or may not use AI, and may or may not operate with a high degree of autonomy, but they rely heavily on data. In this article, we argue that the data management community is uniquely positioned to lead the responsible design, development, use, and oversight of ADS. We outline a technical research agenda that requires that we step outside our comfort zone of engineering for efficiency and accuracy, to also incorporate reasoning about values and beliefs. This seems high-risk, but one of the upsides is being able to explain to our children what we do and why it matters. 

   more » « less