An official website of the United States government
Abstract Positive lightning leaders are a ubiquitous, yet poorly understood, component of lightning flashes. Upward lightning started by positive leaders may be formed when nearby storm activity induces electrical charges in a tall structure, such as communications towers or wind turbines. Alternatively, upward lightning can be triggered with the rocket‐and‐wire technique. In this paper, we introduce a new self‐consistent model for this important discharge mode, one which solves Maxwell's equations under the quasi‐electrostatic approximation. The model also includes a realistic treatment of the nonlinear plasma conductivity within the leader channel. This new computational tool explains the origin of the positive leader speed, of 10s of km/s, as well as why it displays a steady behavior over time. The model also explains the temporal evolution of current to ground measured during the early stages of rocket‐triggered lightning, where the current exhibits a series of small‐amplitude pulses, which disappear over time. The article also outlines straightforward criteria for leader inception, which may have practical applications for lightning protection.
more »
« less
Polarity Asymmetries in Rocket‐Triggered Lightning
Abstract The dissonant development of positive and negative lightning leaders is a central question in atmospheric electricity. It is also the likely root cause of other reported asymmetries between positive and negative lightning flashes, including the ones regarding: stroke multiplicity, recoil activity, leader velocities, and emission of energetic radiation. In an effort to contrast lightning leaders of different polarities, we highlight the staggering differences between two rocket‐triggered lightning flashes. The flash beginning with upward positive leaders exhibits an initial continuous current stage followed by multiple sequences of dart leaders and return strokes. On the other, in its opposite‐polarity counterpart, the upward development of negative leaders is by itself the entire flash. As a result, the flash with negative leaders is faster, briefer, transfers less charge to the ground, has lower currents, and smaller spatial extent. We conclude by presenting a discussion on the three fundamental leader propagation modes.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10524952
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Geophysical Union
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 17
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract We have studied the vertical negative leader progression features and the charge structures of 13 typical winter lightning flashes that produced downward terrestrial gamma‐ray flashes (TGFs). All these flashes started at altitudes below 1.5 km with an initial downward negative leader that propagates at a speed ranging from 1.3 to 4.5 × 106 m/s, followed by a strong negative return stroke called “energetic compact stroke” (ECS). After the ECS, usually there exists a radio quiet period lasting more than 10 ms. Interestingly, for more than half of the cases, soon after the resumed activities, an upward negative leader occurred at a position close to the lightning initiation point. Most of TGF lightning occurred under a main negative charge layer at the height of around 2 km. This negative charge layer is usually featured with a thickness of less than 2 km and a horizontal extension of more than 10 km.more » « less
-
Abstract Using a 30–250 MHz VHF interferometer, we observed a previously unreported mode of initial lightning development inside thunderclouds. This mode is defined by continuous VHF radiation spanning several km within the first few milliseconds of lightning initiation. Following flash initiation through fast positive breakdown at high altitudes above 9 km, the VHF radiation front of upward negative streamers ascended continuously at a speed of ∼1.0 × 106 m/s, forming a continuous initial breakdown burst (CIBB) about 2 km in length. For the two CIBBs analyzed, the long and narrow CIBB channel was traversed by dart leaders that occurred later in the flash, indicating that the CIBB channel belongs to what becomes the main conducting leader channel. In contrast to classic initial breakdown pulses (IBPs) with sub‐pulses superimposed on the rising edge, CIBBs produced a series of discrete, narrow LF pulses (<10 μs) with an average time interval of 0.20 and 0.14 ms, respectively. We speculate that a CIBB is a continuously developing negative streamer system in the high electric field region at high altitudes, with connections of internal plasma channels producing LF pulses. These results have implications for physical conditions conducive to the formation of a long and continuous negative streamer system.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract Time-correlated high-speed video and electric field change data for 139 natural, negative cloud-to-ground (CG)-lightning flashes reveal 615 return strokes (RSs) and 29 upward-illumination (UI)-type strokes. Among 121 multi-stroke flashes, 56% visibly connected to more than one ground location for either a RS or UI-type stroke. The number of separate ground-stroke connection locations per CG flash averaged 1.74, with maximum 6. This study examines the 88 subsequent strokes that involved a subsequent stepped leader (SSL), either reaching ground or intercepting a former leader to ground, in 61 flashes. Two basic modes by which these SSLs begin are described and are termed dart - then - stepped leaders herein. One inception mode occurs when a dart leader deflects from the prior main channel and begins propagating as a stepped leader to ground. In these ‘divert’ mode cases, the relevant interstroke time from the prior RS in the channel to the SSL inception from that path is long, ranging from 105 to 204 ms in four visible cases. The alternative mode of SSL inception occurs when a dart leader reaches the end of a prior unsuccessful branch—of an earlier competing dart leader, stepped leader, or initial leader—then begins advancing as a stepped leader toward ground. In this more common ‘branch’ mode (85% of visible cases), there may be no portion of the subsequent RS channel that is shared with a prior RS channel. These two inception modes, and variations among them, can occur in different subsequent strokes of the same flash.more » « less
-
Abstract The LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) radio telescope possesses the unique capability to measure ultra‐high energy cosmic rays as well as image lightning discharges. This study presents a comparison between the inferred thunderstorm charge structures derived from cosmic‐ray measurements and from lightning flashes. Our results show a basic triple‐layered distribution: a positive upper layer, a main negative layer, and a positive lower layer. However, our cosmic‐ray measurement shows a bottom‐heavy structure, where the charge in the upper positively charged layer is smaller than that in the lower one. This is consistent with practically all lightning observations with LOFAR, showing well‐developed negative leader structures at altitudes below those where positive leaders are seen. This is very different from the vast majority of thundercloud charge structures seen around the world.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105041
