Many behaviors that we perform everyday, including something as familiar as making a peanut-butter sandwich, consist of a sequence of recognizable acts. These acts may include, for example, holding a knife and opening a jar. Yet often neither the sequence nor the individual acts are always performed in the exact same way. For example, there are many ways to hold a knife and there are many ways to open a jar, meaning neither of these actions could be called “stereotyped”. A lack of stereotypy makes it difficult for a computer to automatically recognize the individual acts in a sequence. This same problem would apply to other common behaviors, such as walking around somewhere you have not visited before. While we easily recognize it when we see it, walking is not a stereotyped behavior. It consists of a series of movements that differ between individuals, and even in the same individual at different times. So how can someone automatically recognize the individual acts in a non-stereotyped behavior like walking? To begin to find out, Tao et al. developed a mathematical model that can recognize the walking behavior of a fruit fly. Existing recordings of fruit flies walking were analyzed using a type of mathematical model called a Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model (often shortened to HHMM). Such models assume that there are hidden states that influence the behaviors we can see. For example, someone’s chances of going skiing (an observable behavior) depend on whether or not it is winter (a hidden state). The HHMM revealed that the seemingly random wanderings of a fly consist of ten types of movement. These include the “meander”, the “stop-and-walk”, as well as right turns and left turns. Exposing the flies to a pleasant odor – in this case, apple cider vinegar – altered how the flies walked by changing the time they spent performing each of the different types of movement. All flies in the dataset used the same ten movements, but in different proportions. This means that each fly showed an individual pattern of movement. In fact, the differences between flies are so great that Tao et al. argue that there is no such thing as an average walk for a fruit fly. The model represents a complete description of how fruit flies walk. It thus provides clues to the processes that transform an animal’s sensory experiences into behavior. But it also has potential clinical applications. Similar models for human behaviors could help reveal behaviors that are abnormal because of disease. Normal behaviors also show variability, and some diseases increase or decrease this variability. By making it easier to detect these changes, mathematical models could support earlier diagnosis of medical conditions.
more »
« less
Tracking and modeling the movement of Queensland fruit flies, Bactrocera tryoni, using harmonic radar in papaya fields
Determining movement parameters for pest insects such as tephritid fruit flies is critical to developing models which can be used to increase the effectiveness of surveillance and control strategies. In this study, harmonic radar was used to track wild-caught male Queensland fruit flies (Qflies),
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10528404
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Scientific Reports
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2045-2322
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
This study employs supervised machine learning algorithms to test whether locomotive features during exploratory activity in open field arenas can serve as predictors for the genotype of fruit flies. Because of the nonlinearity in locomotive trajectories, traditional statistical methods that are used to compare exploratory activity between genotypes of fruit flies may not reveal all insights. 10-minute-long trajectories of four different genotypes of fruit flies in an open-field arena environment were captured. Turn angles and step size features extracted from the trajectories were used for training supervised learning models to predict the genotype of the fruit flies. Using the first five minute locomotive trajectories, an accuracy of 83% was achieved in differentiating wild-type flies from three other mutant genotypes. Using the final 5 min and the entire ten minute duration decreased the performance indicating that the most variations between the genotypes in their exploratory activity are exhibited in the first few minutes. Feature importance analysis revealed that turn angle is a better predictor than step size in predicting fruit fly genotype. Overall, this study demonstrates that features of trajectories can be used to predict the genotype of fruit flies through supervised machine learning methods.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract “Dynamic interactions” in animals are inter‐individual interactions defined by proximity in both space and time and are important for understanding spatial behaviors such as mating, predation, and territoriality, as well as phenomena such as disease spread. Dynamic interactions are typically quantified by analyzing GPS locations as
points or by examining thepaths that are inferred as trajectories between subsequent points. Current path‐based approaches measure movement similarity in terms of step length and azimuth, which is associated with a relatively narrow conceptualization of interaction (e.g., traveling together). This research explores how other, more complex movement parameters may differ with proximity to another individual; if proximity‐related movement differences can be detected, this information can be used to generate new dynamic interaction metrics. This approach was first tested using simulated movement data with known interaction properties, then applied to 10 black‐backed jackal (Canis mesomelus ) dyads in Etosha National Park, Namibia. In general, an individual's movement was often different when it was close to another individual, suggesting that dynamic interaction can potentially be inferred by analyzing movement parameters. Movement parameters that describe directional persistence, speed, and change performed better, but there was considerable variation across movement parameters, proximity, and individuals. -
more » « less
Abstract Spatial patterning of different cell types is crucial for tissue engineering and is characterized by the formation of sharp boundary between segregated groups of cells of different lineages. The cell−cell boundary layers, depending on the relative adhesion forces, can result in kinks in the border, similar to fingering patterns between two viscous partially miscible fluids which can be characterized by its fractal dimension. This suggests that mathematical models used to analyze the fingering patterns can be applied to cell migration data as a metric for intercellular adhesion forces. In this study, we develop a novel computational analysis method to characterize the interactions between blood endothelial cells (BECs) and lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs), which form segregated vasculature by recognizing each other through podoplanin. We observed indiscriminate mixing with LEC−LEC and BEC−BEC pairs and a sharp boundary between LEC−BEC pair, and fingering-like patterns with pseudo-LEC−BEC pairs. We found that the box counting method yields fractal dimension between 1 for sharp boundaries and 1.3 for indiscriminate mixing, and intermediate values for fingering-like boundaries. We further verify that these results are due to differential affinity by performing random walk simulations with differential attraction to nearby cells and generate similar migration pattern, confirming that higher differential attraction between different cell types result in lower fractal dimensions. We estimate the characteristic velocity and interfacial tension for our simulated and experimental data to show that the fractal dimension negatively correlates with capillary number (
Ca ), further indicating that the mathematical models used to study viscous fingering pattern can be used to characterize cell−cell mixing. Taken together, these results indicate that the fractal analysis of segregation boundaries can be used as a simple metric to estimate relative cell−cell adhesion forces between different cell types. -
more » « less
Abstract Generalist primates eat many food types and shift their diet with changes in food availability. Variation in foods eaten may not, however, match variation in nutrient intake. We examined dietary variation in a generalist‐feeder, the blue monkey (
Cercopithecus mitis ), to see how dietary food intake related to variation in available food and nutrient intake. We used 371 all‐day focal follows from 24 adult females (three groups) in a wild rainforest population to quantify daily diet over 9 months. We measured food availability using vegetation surveys and phenology monitoring. We analyzed >700 food and fecal samples for macronutrient content. Subjects included 445 food items (species‐specific plant parts and insect morphotypes) in their diet. Variation in fruit consumption (percentage of diet and total kcal) tracked variation in availability, suggesting fruit was a preferred food type. Fruits also constituted the majority of the diet (by calories) and some fruit species were eaten more than expected based on relative availability. In contrast, few species of young leaves were eaten more than expected. Also, subjects ate fewer young leaves (based on calories consumed) when fruit or young leaves were more available, suggesting that young leaves served as fallback foods. Despite the broad range of foods in the diet, group differences in fiber digestibility, and variation that reflected food availability, subjects and groups converged on similar nutrient intakes (grand mean ± SD: 637.1 ± 104.7 kcal overall energy intake, 293.3 ± 46.9 kcal nonstructural carbohydrate, 147.8 ± 72.4 kcal lipid, 107.8 ± 12.9 kcal available protein, and 88.1 ± 17.5 kcal structural carbohydrate;N = 24 subjects). Thus, blue monkeys appear to be food composition generalists and nutrient intake specialists, using flexible feeding strategies to regulate nutrient intake. Findings highlight the importance of simultaneously examining dietary composition at both levels of foods and nutrients to understand primate feeding ecology.
