More Like this

1. Cost-Reducing Traits for Agonistic Head Collisions: A Case for Neurophysiology

   https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icab034  

   Tobiansky, Daniel J; Long, Kira M; Hamden, Jordan E; Brawn, Jeffrey D; Fuxjager, Matthew J (April 2021, Integrative and Comparative Biology)

   null (Ed.)

   Synopsis Many animal species have evolved extreme behaviors requiring them to engage in repeated high-impact collisions. These behaviors include mating displays like headbutting in sheep and drumming in woodpeckers. To our knowledge, these taxa do not experience any notable acute head trauma, even though the deceleration forces would cause traumatic brain injury in most animals. Previous research has focused on skeletomuscular morphology, biomechanics, and material properties in an attempt to explain how animals moderate these high-impact forces. However, many of these behaviors are understudied, and most morphological or computational studies make assumptions about the behavior without accounting for the physiology of an organism. Studying neurophysiological and immune adaptations that covary with these behaviors can highlight unique or synergistic solutions to seemingly deleterious behavioral displays. Here, we argue that selection for repeated, high-impact head collisions may rely on a suite of coadaptations in intracranial physiology as a cost-reducing mechanism. We propose that there are three physiological systems that could mitigate the effects of repeated head trauma: (1) the innate neuroimmune response; (2) the glymphatic system, and (3) the choroid plexus. These systems are interconnected yet can evolve in an independent manner. We then briefly describe the function of these systems, their role in head trauma, and research that has examined how these systems may evolve to help reduce the cost of repeated, forceful head impacts. Ultimately, we note that little is known about cost-reducing intracranial mechanisms making it a novel field of comparative study that is ripe for exploration. 

   more » « less
2. Craniofacial skeletal response to encephalization: How do we know what we think we know?

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23766  

   Lesciotto, Kate M.; Richtsmeier, Joan T. (January 2019, American Journal of Physical Anthropology)

   Abstract Dramatic changes in cranial capacity have characterized human evolution. Important evolutionary hypotheses, such as the spatial packing hypothesis, assert that increases in relative brain size (encephalization) have caused alterations to the modern human skull, resulting in a suite of traits unique among extant primates, including a domed cranial vault, highly flexed cranial base, and retracted facial skeleton. Most prior studies have used fossil or comparative primate data to establish correlations between brain size and cranial form, but the mechanistic basis for how changes in brain size impact the overall shape of the skull resulting in these cranial traits remains obscure and has only rarely been investigated critically. We argue that understanding how changes in human skull morphology could have resulted from increased encephalization requires the direct testing of hypotheses relating to interaction of embryonic development of the bones of the skull and the brain. Fossil and comparative primate data have thoroughly described the patterns of association between brain size and skull morphology. Here we suggest complementing such existing datasets with experiments focused on mechanisms responsible for producing the observed patterns to more thoroughly understand the role of encephalization in shaping the modern human skull. 

   more » « less
3. Are endocasts good proxies for brain size and shape in archosaurs throughout ontogeny?

   https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12918  

   Watanabe, Akinobu; Gignac, Paul M.; Balanoff, Amy M.; Green, Todd L.; Kley, Nathan J.; Norell, Mark A. (December 2018, Journal of Anatomy)

   Abstract Cranial endocasts, or the internal molds of the braincase, are a crucial correlate for investigating the neuroanatomy of extinct vertebrates and tracking brain evolution through deep time. Nevertheless, the validity of such studies pivots on the reliability of endocasts as a proxy for brain morphology. Here, we employ micro‐computed tomography imaging, including diffusible iodine‐based contrast‐enhancedCT, and a three‐dimensional geometric morphometric framework to examine both size and shape differences between brains and endocasts of two exemplar archosaur taxa – the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) and the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus). With ontogenetic sampling, we quantitatively evaluate how endocasts differ from brains and whether this deviation changes during development. We find strong size and shape correlations between brains and endocasts, divergent ontogenetic trends in the brain‐to‐endocast correspondence between alligators and chickens, and a comparable magnitude between brain–endocast shape differences and intraspecific neuroanatomical variation. The results have important implications for paleoneurological studies in archosaurs. Notably, we demonstrate that the pattern of endocranial shape variation closely reflects brain shape variation. Therefore, analyses of endocranial morphology are unlikely to generate spurious conclusions about large‐scale trends in brain size and shape. To mitigate any artifacts, however, paleoneurological studies should consider the lower brain–endocast correspondence in the hindbrain relative to the forebrain; higher size and shape correspondences in chickens than alligators throughout postnatal ontogeny; artificially ‘pedomorphic’ shape of endocasts relative to their corresponding brains; and potential biases in both size and shape data due to the lack of control for ontogenetic stages in endocranial sampling. 

   more » « less
4. Soft-tissue fossilization illuminates the stepwise evolution of the ray-finned fish brain

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.05.027  

   Figueroa, Rodrigo T; Weinschütz, Luiz Carlos; Giles, Sam; Friedman, Matt (July 2024, Current Biology)

   A complex brain is central to the success of backboned animals. However, direct evidence bearing on vertebrate brain evolution comes almost exclusively from extant species, leaving substantial knowledge gaps. Although rare, soft-tissue preservation in fossils can yield unique insights on patterns of neuroanatomical evolution. Paleontological evidence from an exceptionally preserved Pennsylvanian (ca. 318 Ma) actinopterygian, Coccocephalus, calls into question prior interpretations of ancestral actinopterygian brain conditions. However, ordering and timing of major evolutionary innovations such as an everted telencephalon, modified meningeal tissues, and hypothalamic inferior lobes remain unclear. Here we report two distinct actinopterygian morphotypes from the latest Carboniferous-earliest Permian (~299 Ma) of Brazil that show extensive soft-tissue preservation of brains, cranial nerves, eyes and potential cardiovascular tissues. These fossils corroborate inferences drawn from Coccocephalus, while adding new information about neuroanatomical evolution. Skeletal features indicate that one of these Brazilian morphotypes is more closely related to living actinopterygians than the other, which is also reflected in soft-tissue features. Significantly, the more crownward morphotype shows a key neuroanatomical feature of extant actinopterygians–an everted telencephalon–that is absent in the other morphotype and Coccocephalus. All preserved Paleozoic actinopterygian brains show broad similarities including an invaginated cerebellum, hypothalamus inferior lobes, and a small forebrain. In each case, preserved brains are substantially smaller than the enclosing cranial chamber. The neuroanatomical similarities shared by this grade of Permo-Carboniferous actinopterygians reflect probable primitive conditions for actinopterygians, providing a revised model for interpreting brain evolution in a major branch of the vertebrate tree of life. 

   more » « less
5. Experimental transplants demonstrate shifts in predation favour evolution of aggressive behaviours in Trinidadian killifish

   https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14724  

   Korte, Meghan; Walsh, Matthew R (February 2025, Functional Ecology)

   Abstract Theory asserts larger brains facilitate behaviours that enhance fitness. Research has demonstrated that increased brain size improves cognition and survival. However, the majority of research has focused on cross‐species comparisons. Experiments that manipulate selection to investigate the connection between brain size, behaviour and fitness are needed.Trinidadian killifish (Anablepsoides hartii) live in communities with (high predation: HP) and without (killifish only: KO) predators. Predator absence is associated with high population densities, increased intraspecific competition and evolved larger brain sizes.We tested for evolutionary shifts in behaviour by subjecting second‐generation lab‐reared killifish to a mirror aggression assay. We also quantify selection on brain size and behaviour by transplanting wild HP killifish to KO sites and tracking individual fitness (growth rates) with a mark‐recapture design.Lab‐reared killifish from KO sites—specifically males—exhibited higher levels of aggression than HP killifish. In the transplant experiment, HP killifish exhibited strong increases in aggression following the introduction to KO sites. Increased brain size was correlated with increased growth in transplanted HP killifish, yet there was no association between brain size, aggression and growth.Our results indicate that declines in predation and increased competition favour increases in aggression but further research is needed to determine if and how brain size and behaviour are linked through natural selection. Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog. 

   more » « less