skip to main content

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 8:00 PM ET on Friday, March 21 until 8:00 AM ET on Saturday, March 22 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


This content will become publicly available on June 23, 2025

Title: Exploring Career Growth for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Individuals via Machining Training: A Comparative Behavioral Analysis
Overcoming challenges and transitioning from school to work is particularly problematic for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, presenting significant issues for both the labor market and vocational training institutions. Due to the lack of research addressing the career maturity and distinctive obstacles faced by this population, this paper endeavors to investigate performance disparities within the machining field. The specific focus is on assessing whether hearing loss may impact students' machining performance. Considering the essential human capabilities for perception in machining, especially in industrial settings, encompass a range of faculties including visualization, hearing, and tactile senses. Thus, addressing concerns related to accommodating individuals with disabilities is important, prompting inquiries into optimizing training programs and quantifying potential disparities in learning or schooling outcomes, behavioral patterns, and overall performance in future careers. The conducted studies involved multiple participants, including hearing, deaf, and hard-of-hearing students with various machining training backgrounds. The investigation will delve into data concerning the qualities of manual machining outputs and the subject’s self-rating feedback. The outcomes from this study are expected not only to allow to obtain more insights into human behavior in machining operations, but also to identify key differences between machinist trainees who exhibit no underlying hearing problems and ones who are deaf/hard of hearing. The findings of this work provide valuable takeaways concerning machinists with hearing loss, revealing little to no effect of hearing loss on trainee performance, alleviating concerns about potential performance weaknesses. The outcomes from this study have shown that trainee experience seems to relate directly to machining proficiency, regardless of hearing loss.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2202179
PAR ID:
10532348
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
American Society for Engineering Education
Date Published:
Journal Name:
ASEE annual conference proceedings
ISSN:
1524-4857
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    Over the years, there has been much research in both wearable and video-based American Sign Language (ASL) recognition systems. However, the restrictive and invasive nature of these sensing modalities remains a significant disadvantage in the context of Deaf-centric smart environments or devices that are responsive to ASL. This paper investigates the efficacy of RF sensors for word-level ASL recognition in support of human-computer interfaces designed for deaf or hard-of-hearing individuals. A principal challenge is the training of deep neural networks given the difficulty in acquiring native ASL signing data. In this paper, adversarial domain adaptation is exploited to bridge the physical/kinematic differences between the copysigning of hearing individuals (repetition of sign motion after viewing a video), and native signing of Deaf individuals who are fluent in sign language. Domain adaptation results are compared with those attained by directly synthesizing ASL signs using generative adversarial networks (GANs). Kinematic improvements to the GAN architecture, such as the insertion of micro-Doppler signature envelopes in a secondary branch of the GAN, are utilized to boost performance. Word-level classification accuracy of 91.3% is achieved for 20 ASL words. 
    more » « less
  2. This study examined knowledge sharing and problem solving in teams that included teammates who were deaf or hard of hearing (DHH). Eighteen teams of four students were comprised of either all deaf or hard of hearing (DHH), all hearing, or two DHH and two hearing postsecondary students who participated in group problem-solving. Successful problem solution, recall, and recognition of knowledge shared by team members were assessed. Hearing teams shared the most team knowledge and achieved the most complete problem solutions, followed by the mixed DHH/hearing teams. DHH teams did not perform as well as the other two types of teams.

     
    more » « less
  3. Multiple studies have reported mathematics underachievement for students who are deaf, but the onset, scope, and causes of this phenomenon remain understudied. Early language deprivation might be one factor influencing the acquisition of numbers. In this study, we investigated a basic and fundamental mathematical skill, automatic magnitude processing, in two formats (Arabic digits and American Sign Language number signs) and the influence of age of first language exposure on both formats by using two versions of the Number Stroop Test. We compared the performance of individuals born deaf who experienced early language deprivation to that of individuals born deaf who experienced sign language in early life and hearing second language learners of ASL. In both formats of magnitude representation, late first language learners demonstrated overall slower reaction times. They were also less accurate on incongruent trials but performed no differently from early signers and second language learners on other trials. When magnitude was represented by Arabic digits, late first language learners exhibited robust Number Stroop Effects, suggesting automatic magnitude processing, but they also demonstrated a large speed difference between size and number judgments not observed in the other groups. In a task with ASL number signs, the Number Stroop Effect was not found in any group, suggesting that magnitude representation might be format-specific, in line with the results from several other languages. Late first language learners also demonstrate unusual patterns of slower reaction time for neutral rather than incongruent stimuli. Together, the results show that early language deprivation affects the ability to automatically judge quantities expressed both linguistically and by Arabic digits, but that it can be acquired later in life when language is available. Contrary to previous studies that find differences in speed of number processing between deaf and hearing participants, we find that when language is acquired early in life, deaf signers perform identically to hearing participants. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    This study addressed the critical gap in research on the academic English vocabulary knowledge of deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) students at the college level, with a specific focus on academic English verbs. An English vocabulary test was developed to assess knowledge of academic verbs at three distinct corpus-defined lexical frequency ranges. The test was administered to the DHH students along with two comparison groups of college peers—students of English as an Additional Language (EAL)1 and hearing native-English-speaking students. Results revealed near-ceiling performance by hearing native speakers but significant vocabulary challenges in the DHH and EAL learner groups, who exhibited parallel lexical knowledge. Learner group performance increased as verb frequency range increased and as overall English proficiency level increased. The findings demonstrate that lexical frequency effects guide English verb acquisition in the targeted populations.2

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract The auditory scaffolding hypothesis states that early experience with sound underpins the development of domain-general sequence processing abilities, supported by studies observing impaired sequence processing in deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) children. To test this hypothesis, we administered a sequence processing task to 77 DHH children who use American Sign Language (ASL) and 23 hearing monolingual children aged 7–12 years and found no performance difference between them after controlling for age and nonverbal intelligence. Additionally, neither spoken language comprehension scores nor hearing loss levels predicted sequence processing scores in the DHH group, whereas ASL comprehension scores did. Our results do not indicate sequence processing deficits in DHH children and do not support the auditory scaffolding hypothesis; instead, these findings suggest that factors related to experience with and/or proficiency in an accessible language during development may be more important determinants of sequence processing abilities. 
    more » « less