skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: The Mini-Mill Experience: A Self-Paced Introductory Machining Exercise for Mechanical Engineering Students
Practicing mechanical engineers interface regularly with machinists to design and manufacture components in metal and other engineered materials. Direct, hands-on exposure to precision machining operations, like mill and lathe work, helps young engineers design manufacturable components and facilitates better collaboration with machinists. Mechanical engineering undergraduate programs have been cited for weaknesses in training students on industry-standard manufacturing practices. While there are several excellent examples in the literature of student manufacturing projects, these projects are relatively advanced on the whole, and they require extensive human and capital resources to deploy in large-enrollment classes. Prior investigators have conserved resources by teaming students on projects, which dilutes the hands-on manufacturing experience for individual learners. In this study, we present an introductory mill training exercise for engineering students that allows them to individually develop transferable machining skills but requires fairly modest resources. This exercise, which we call the “Mini-Mill Experience,” involves students individually manufacturing two separate parts with a hobby-grade mini-mill and then completing a written self-reflection documenting their procedures and final part inspection. Students first manufacture a simple part out of reusable wax with direct coaching from a teaching assistant. They then independently manufacture one of six different wooden Erector Set components. The Mini-Mill Experience is designed to give students firsthand experience and promote confidence with the basic mill controls and operations, e.g., changing out an endmill or squaring up a face, that are transferable to the full-sized mills they will use in later courses. The one-time equipment set-up costs for this exercise were approximately $60 per student, with recurring costs of less than $2 per student for stock material. Each student completed the exercise during a two-hour lab period, and it took approximately six weeks for all students in the course (ca. 170 students) to complete the exercise. All sessions were supervised by a machinist and one to two teaching assistants. To gauge the effectiveness of the Mini-Mill Experience, a survey was distributed to all students in a freshmen year mechanical engineering design course. Survey responses indicated that the majority of the students (77%) had no prior experience with mills. Post-activity, students reported high levels of self-confidence in identifying the critical components of a mill and most basic mill operations, like proper use of a vise and tool changes. Compared to students who had prior mill experience, students with no prior experience demonstrated slightly lower self-efficacy with more advanced mill operations like creating blind holes and tapping threads. Post-activity, 75% of students agreed they “were not intimidated or afraid to use the mill to make a part,” and 90% said that they “looked forward to their next experience on a mill.” In this study, we developed an introductory manufacturing experience – the “Mini-Mill Experience” – that is effective in teaching basic mill operations, promotes students’ self-efficacy and enthusiasm for future machining experiences, and is cost effective and scalable for large class sizes. In these ways, it is a valuable addition to the existing literature and curriculum on manufacturing education for mechanical engineers. Future work by our group will focus on whether the skills acquired in the Mini-Mill Experience are transferable to manufacturing experiences later in the curriculum.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2301341
PAR ID:
10532643
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
ASEE Conferences
Date Published:
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
Portland, Oregon
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. This research-to-practice paper reports students' perceptions on using a teaching framework called authentic learning to learn about information flow analysis. Using information flow analysis, practitioners find the flow of data across one or multiple programs. Information flow analysis is helpful for multiple software engineering activities, such as detecting software bugs and developing software fuzzing techniques. Despite being helpful in practice, learning about information flow analysis remains an impediment for students, which in turn prevents them from reaping the benefits of using information flow analysis. Therefore, an application of a teaching framework can aid students in learning about information flow analysis. To that end, we systematically investigate if authentic learning---a teaching framework that emphasizes on providing hands on experience for a practically relevant topic---is helpful for students to learn about information flow analysis. Upon conducting the exercise, students are asked to participate in a survey where they report perceptions about the conducted exercise. We analyze data from 170 students who were introduced to information flow analysis through an authentic learning-based exercise. From our analysis, we observe: (i) majority of the students to have little to no knowledge about information flow analysis prior to conducting the authentic learning-based exercise; (ii) 74.1\% of the 170 students find the authentic learning-based exercise helpful to learn about information flow analysis; and (iii) student perceptions to vary for the three components of the authentic learning-based exercise. We conclude our paper by describing the implications of our findings for instructors and researchers. For example, instructors should consider the education level of students while designing activities for individual authentic learning components to educate students on information flow analysis. Furthermore, researchers can devise strategies on how instructors can allocate their efforts for each authentic learning component through empirical studies. These studies may investigate the correlation between reported helpfulness and socio-technical factors, such as education level of students. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    Abstract Insufficient engineering analysis is a common weakness of student capstone design projects. Efforts made earlier in a curriculum to introduce analysis techniques should improve student confidence in applying these important skills toward design. To address student shortcomings in design, we implemented a new design project assignment for second-year undergraduate biomedical engineering students. The project involves the iterative design of a fracture fixation plate and is part of a broader effort to integrate relevant hands-on projects throughout our curriculum. Students are tasked with (1) using computer-aided design (CAD) software to make design changes to a fixation plate, (2) creating and executing finite element models to assess performance after each change, (3) iterating through three design changes, and (4) performing mechanical testing of the final device to verify model results. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to assess student knowledge, confidence, and achievement in design. Students exhibited design knowledge gains and cognizance of prior coursework knowledge integration into their designs. Further, students self-reported confidence gains in approaching design, working with hardware and software, and communicating results. Finally, student self-assessments exceeded instructor assessment of student design reports, indicating that students have significant room for growth as they progress through the curriculum. Beyond the gains observed in design knowledge, confidence, and achievement, the fracture fixation project described here builds student experience with CAD, finite element analysis, 3D printing, mechanical testing, and design communication. These skills contribute to the growing toolbox that students ultimately bring to capstone design. 
    more » « less
  3. This Work-in-progress paper presents the pilot study of implementing a Virtual Reality (VR) environment to teach a junior-level Mechanical Engineering laboratory class at Prairie View A&M University. The target class is the manufacturing processes laboratory, which initially aimed to provide a hands-on experience with various manufacturing equipment. Providing students with systematic training followed by repetitive access to manufacturing equipment is required for longer knowledge retention and safety in laboratories. Yet, complications from the pandemic and other logistical events have negatively affected many universities' laboratory courses. The objective of this study is to examine the potential and effectiveness of the VR framework in engineering education. More specifically, this paper details the project's first phase, which includes the development and deployment of machining VR modules and preliminary outcomes. The VR module in this phase is based on the existing hammer fabrication project that requires the utilization of a milling machine, drill press, lathe, tap, and threading dies. A virtual replica of the machining laboratory was created using C# and the unity 3D game engine and published as an Android Package Kit (APK) for the META platform to be used in Oculus Quest 2 devices. The module is composed of three submodules, each corresponding to different hammer parts. These VR submodules replace traditional verbal and video training and are deployed in two semesters with 46 student participants. The student performance in project reports is compared with a control group for a quantitative assessment. Early conclusions indicate that the students remember the operation procedures and functions of equipment longer and are more confident in operating each manufacturing equipment leading to better quality parts and reports. 
    more » « less
  4. Cook, S; Katz, B P; Melhuish, K (Ed.)
    Projects to improve teaching as a means to improve learning need good tools to measure shifts in the use of effective research-based instructional strategies. We describe a survey tool to assess active and collaborative learning practices in college STEM by asking students to report what practices are used commonly in their course. Student reports correlate with their experience of the learning environment, and with their self-reported learning outcomes. Student means by section are corroborated by instructor-reported use of these practices and external observations. 
    more » « less
  5. Design for manufacturing provides engineers with a structure for accommodating the limitations of traditional manufacturing processes. However, little emphasis is typically given to the capabilities of processes that enable novel design geometries, which are often a point of focus when designing products to be made with additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. In addition, limited research has been conducted to understand how knowledge of both the capabilities (i.e., opportunistic) and limitations (i.e., restrictive aspects) of AM affects design outcomes. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the effect of no, restrictive, and both, opportunistic and restrictive (dual) design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) education on engineering students’ creative process. Based on the componential model of creativity [1], these effects were measured through changes in (1) motivation and interest in AM, (2) DfAM self-efficacy, and (3) the emphasis given to DfAM in the design process. These metrics were chosen as they represent the cognitive components of ‘task-motivation’ and ‘domain relevant skills’, which in turn influence the learning and usage of domain knowledge in creative production. The results of the study show that while the short (45 minute) DfAM intervention did not significantly change student motivation and interest towards AM, students showed high levels of motivation and interest towards AM, before the intervention. Teaching students different aspects of DfAM also resulted in an increase in their self-efficacy in the respective topics. However, despite showing a greater increase in self-efficacy in their respective areas of training, the students did not show differences in the emphasis they gave to these DfAM concepts, in the design process. Further, students from all three education groups showed higher use of restrictive concepts, in comparison to opportunistic DfAM. 
    more » « less