An official website of the United States government
The ability to communicate technical information in written, graphical, and verbal formats is an essential durable skill for engineering students to develop as undergraduates and carry forward into the workplace. The importance of technical communication skills is emphasized in the core ABET outcome “3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences.” Undergraduate engineering programs tend to adopt one of two strategies for technical writing instruction, either offering a stand-alone course that is frequently taught out-of-discipline or embedding technical communications skills within-discipline in laboratory or design classes. Despite these efforts, employers still report that novice engineers’ technical communications skills do not meet industry expectations. Prior work by our group attempted to address this skills gap through the design and implementation of a unique stand-alone technical communications course that was specifically created for first-year mechanical engineering students and centered on multiple, industry-aligned modalities of communication. Preliminary evaluation of this new curriculum showed that students demonstrated substantive gains in self-efficacy for nearly all technical communication skills covered in the course, including synthesis of background research, graphical representation of data, basic statistical analyses, and composition of technical reports and presentations in a variety of formats. In this paper, we will extend our prior work by examining whether the skills emphasized in this stand-alone first year course are transferred into later courses within the discipline. Specifically, we will focus on three core skill sets: (1) writing clear, concise, and coherent technical narratives; (2) graphical representation of quantitative and qualitative data sets; and (3) basic statistical analyses, including linear regressions, one-way ANOVA, and propagation of error. We will follow a single cohort of mechanical engineering students (n=147), beginning with the stand-alone technical communications course taken in the spring of their freshmen year, through their two subsequent semesters of coursework involving discipline-specific design and laboratory-based courses. For two semesters, post-course surveys will be administered to students that assess self-efficacy for the three core skill sets as well as their perceptions of the value and applicability of the first-year technical communications course in their current coursework. Also, written deliverables for a subset of students will be evaluated by faculty instructors according to established technical communications rubrics. The results of this study will be used to refine our first-year technical communications course and modify the strategies that we are using in later lab and design courses to activate prior technical communications knowledge (e.g., review exercises, exemplars, and common rubrics). More broadly, our approach to developing and reinforcing industry-aligned technical communications skills throughout our undergraduate curriculum may be of interest to other programs seeking to improve student outcomes in this area.
more »
« less
Implementation of a Standalone, Industry-centered Technical Communications Course in a Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate Program
The ability to communicate technical information in written, graphical, and verbal formats is an essential durable skill for engineering students to develop as undergraduates and carry forward into the workplace. Employers have highlighted recent graduates’ inability to formulate tight, cohesive arguments for their engineering decisions, as well as difficulties adjusting their communication style for different audiences. Even though accreditation outcomes now explicitly include durable skills, such as “an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences,” prior research suggests that the field is still far from meeting industry expectations for proficiency in the varying modalities and styles of workplace communication. Laboratory courses are frequently relied upon to teach or reinforce writing and presentation skills. There are two major issues with this approach. First, in lab classes, the communication method is typically narrowly focused on reports that simulate writing for hypothesis-driven research projects, which fail to align with the design-based and project management aspects of professional engineering workloads. Second, lab courses that heavily emphasize technical communications frequently do so at the expense of technical knowledge, that is, the engineering concepts involved with the laboratory experiment. Many students already view communication skills as “soft” in comparison to technical knowledge; and this attitude affects their performance and retention. In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a stand-alone technical communications course that was specifically created for first-year mechanical engineering students and centered on multiple, industry-aligned modalities of communication. There are two major writing assignments in the course, both of which are open-ended “technical briefs” that involve background research, data analysis, and justification of an engineering decision for a design firm. For these major assignments, students individually submit a draft and receive detailed feedback for improvement before submitting the final versions. These two major assignments are scaffolded with weekly individual assignments that give students experience with a range of communication skills and modalities, e.g., using a reference manager and composing professional emails. To gauge the effectiveness of this stand-alone course in improving students’ technical communication skills, we conducted pre- and post-course surveys of all students enrolled in the course in 2023 (n=147), and we also tracked improvements in technical writing from draft to final form via established rubrics. Students demonstrated gains in self-efficacy for nearly all technical communication skills covered in the course as well as improved self-efficacy in different communication modalities, e.g., email, slide presentations, and executive summaries. The results of this evaluation suggest that a stand-alone, industry-centered technical communications course builds student competency with communication strategies used in the workplace. Future work will focus on whether students are able to transfer these skills into latter courses and ultimately their careers.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2301341
- PAR ID:
- 10532644
- Publisher / Repository:
- ASEE Conferences
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Portland, Oregon
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
ABET lists the ability to communicate in writing to both technical and non-technical audiences as a required outcome for baccalaureate engineering students [1]. From emails and memos to formal reports, the ability to communicate is vital to the engineering profession. This Work in Progress paper describes research being done as part of an NSF-funded project, Writing Assignment Tutor Training in STEM (WATTS). The method is designed to improve feedback writing tutors without technical backgrounds give to engineering students on technical reports. Students in engineering programs have few opportunities to develop their writing skills. Usually, composition courses are part of the general education curriculum. Students often see these courses as unrelated to their majors and careers [2]. Ideally, writing support should be integrated throughout a program. Since WATTs capitalizes on existing resources and requires only a modest amount of faculty time, it could enable engineering programs to provide additional writing support to students in multiple courses and provide a bridge for them to see the connection between writing concepts learned in composition courses and their technical reports. WATTS was developed in a junior-level circuit analysis course, where students were completing the same lab and writing individual reports. This paper focuses on a senior capstone course that utilizes concepts taught in previous courses to prepare students to complete an independent team research or design project. Projects are unique, usually based on the needs of an industrial sponsor, and are completed over three consecutive semesters. Each semester, teams write a report based on their activities during that semester, with a comprehensive report in the final semester. The multi-semester nature of the senior design project provides an opportunity for the researchers to chart longitudinal changes from the first to the students’ third semester interactions with the writing tutors, assessing the value of an integrated approach. The program’s impact on students’ attitudes toward revision and the value of tutoring, as well as the impact on tutors, are part of the assessment plan. The program hopes to change the students’ focus from simply presenting their results to communicating them. The goals of the project are to demonstrate to students that revision is essential to the writing process and that feedback can improve their written communication abilities. The expectation is that after graduation they will continue to seek critical feedback as part of their career growth. Surveys given to both students and tutors revealed that the sessions were taken seriously by the students and that meaningful collaboration was achieved between them. An evaluation of the writing in pre-tutored to final submitted report shows statistically significant improvement. Preliminary and current results will be included within the paper. [1] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, ABET, Baltimore, MD., 2020, p.5, ETAC Criteria (abet.org) [2] Bergmann, L. S. and Zepernick, J., “Disciplinarity and Transfer: Students’ Perceptions of Learning to Write,” Writing Program Administration, 31, Fall/Winter 2007.more » « less
-
Technical communication is essential for a career in physics, but communication skills are often not explicitly taught in physics undergraduate curricula. As a starting point for curricular integration, we investigated where and how writing is currently occurring in the core undergraduate physics courses at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. We examined course materials to identify where writing is explicitly or implicitly referenced, the genres that were assigned, and writing concepts that were represented. Analyzing course materials allowed us to identify a wide range of activities and assignments related to writing. We observed that implicit references to writing are prevalent, writing activities are weighted toward upper-level classes, and the most common genres are related to laboratory activities. Writing concepts that occurred frequently in upper-level laboratory courses correspond to disciplinary values of precision and clarity, while concepts of novelty and evidence were infrequent. This type of assessment can help identify gaps in the curriculum, allowing us to be more deliberate about how we develop students’ communication skills.more » « less
-
Industry leaders emphasize that engineering students' technical communication and writing skills must be improved. Despite various institutional efforts, which include technical communication courses or engineering design projects aimed at enhancing students’ communication abilities, many believe there has been only slow improvement in this area. There has also been a dearth of longitudinal studies that examine the development of engineering students’ technical communication competencies from undergraduate to industry. This paper aims to contribute to this area through the creation of a rubric that specifically examines the writing competencies and technical communication ability of engineering students. This paper is part of a larger, NSF-funded research study that examines the quality of students’ written and oral communication skills and seeks to understand their relationship to the students’ spatial abilities. First-year engineering students in their second semester at a large R1 Midwestern university were examined. Students were tasked with creating a written report responding to a set of questions that asked about their team-based engineering design project completed in their first semester. As this occurred months prior, this non-graded report became a reflection on their experience and innate abilities. While low stakes, it mimicked a more authentic writing experience students encounter in industry. Students' responses were examined collaboratively by an interdisciplinary team which created a rubric through an iterative process. This rubric was distributed to the interdisciplinary team and outside evaluators composed of individuals in industry and engineering faculty. An inter-rater reliability analysis was conducted to examine levels of agreement between the interdisciplinary team and outside evaluators, and implications of this inter-rater reliability score and the process of rubric application were documented. Results of this paper include details on the development of a rubric that examine students’ technical communication and writing skills. Traditional rubrics utilized by engineering faculty usually address an entire project for engineering students, which includes students' content knowledge, writing capabilities, and the requirements of the project. Such rubrics are often used to provide feedback to students and evaluation in the form of grades. The narrower focus of the rubric being developed here can provide insights into communication and writing competencies of engineering students. Scores secured through the use of this rubric will aid in the research study’s goal of finding correlations between engineering students’ communication skills and spatial abilities (assessed outside of this current effort). Spatial ability has been well-documented as an effective indicator of success in STEM, and interventions have been developed to support development in students with weaker spatial skills. 23, 24This has prompted this research to explore links between spatial skills and communication abilities, as validated spatial interventions may help improve communication abilities. These current results may also provide unique insights into first-year engineering students’ writing competencies when reporting on a more authentic (non-graded) engineering task. Such information may be useful in eventually shaping guidance of students’ communication instruction in hopes of better preparing them for industry; this is the focus of a planned future research study.more » « less
-
In this paper, we present a science writing assignment in which students focus on targeting specific audiences when writing about a socioscientific issue as well as participate in a peer review process. This assignment helps students consider inclusive science communication in their writing, focusing on engaging unique audiences about the intersections of science and social justice. Students are introduced to evidence-based tools for formulating communication for unique audiences as well as for assessment of writing quality. This assignment is novel in that it helps students think about inclusion issues in STEM, science writing, and peer review, all of which are key disciplinary skills that are not always included in STEM courses. While this assignment was piloted in chemistry and environmental engineering courses, this assignment could easily be modified for other disciplines.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--47576
